IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v91y2024ics0038012123002744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The MEREC-AROMAN method for determining sustainable competitiveness levels: A case study for Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Kara, Karahan
  • Yalçın, Galip Cihan
  • Acar, Avni Zafer
  • Simic, Vladimir
  • Konya, Serkan
  • Pamucar, Dragan

Abstract

Sustainable competitiveness represents a multifaceted phenomenon encompassing economic, environmental, and social dimensions. Macro-level competitiveness strategies are formulated based on the diverse capitals possessed by individual countries, thereby giving rise to variations in the sustainable competitiveness strategies of each country. This research introduces a novel hybrid method called the method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC)−alternative ranking order method accounting for two-step normalization (AROMAN) for determining sustainable competitiveness levels. This study aims to assess Turkey's sustainable competitiveness position vis-à-vis its border neighbors. Natural capital, resource efficiency and intensity, social capital, intellectual capital and innovation, economic sustainability, and governance efficiency are the Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index (GSCI) indicators. The GSCI indicators are employed as criteria for determining the sustainable competitiveness scores of countries. The findings show that the “resource efficiency and intensity” criterion has the highest level of significance. The sustainable competitiveness level of Turkey to its neighboring countries is elucidated based on the results. Recommendations are formulated for the development of strategies aimed at determining Turkey's position in the race for sustainable competitiveness. The introduced MEREC-AROMAN can be utilized to provide rules of thumb for other countries to improve their sustainable competitiveness. This research offers decision support for the formulation of countries' sustainable competitiveness strategies and policies, fostering awareness in the planning and establishment of regional collaborations among nations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kara, Karahan & Yalçın, Galip Cihan & Acar, Avni Zafer & Simic, Vladimir & Konya, Serkan & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024. "The MEREC-AROMAN method for determining sustainable competitiveness levels: A case study for Turkey," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0038012123002744
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012123002744
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Möbius & Wilhelm Althammer, 2020. "Sustainable competitiveness: a spatial econometric analysis of European regions," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(3), pages 453-480, February.
    2. Fakheri, Sajjad & Bahrami-Bidoni, Zeynab & Makui, Ahmad & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto DR., 2022. "A sustainable competitive supply chain network design for a green product under uncertainty: A case study of Iranian leather industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Kumari, Alka & Singh, Manvendra Pratap, 2023. "A journey of social sustainability in organization during MDG & SDG period: A bibliometric analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Avella, Lucia & Fernandez, Esteban & Vazquez, Camilo J., 2001. "Analysis of manufacturing strategy as an explanatory factor of competitiveness in the large Spanish industrial firm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 139-157, July.
    5. Dabbous, Amal & Barakat, Karine Aoun & Kraus, Sascha, 2023. "The impact of digitalization on entrepreneurial activity and sustainable competitiveness: A panel data analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Danny Miller, 2003. "An asymmetry‐based view of advantage: towards an attainable sustainability," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 961-976, October.
    7. Amelia Bilbao-Terol & Mar Arenas-Parra & Vitali Onopko-Onopko, 2019. "Measuring regional sustainable competitiveness: a multi-criteria approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 637-660, September.
    8. Danijela Despotovic & Slobodan Cvetanovic & Vladimir Nedic & Milan Despotovic, 2016. "Economic, social and environmental dimension of sustainable competitiveness of European countries," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(9), pages 1656-1678, September.
    9. Rajesh, R. & Rajeev, A. & Rajendran, Chandrasekharan, 2022. "Corporate social performances of firms in select developed economies: A comparative study," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    10. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Dinesh Kumar Tripathi & Fausto Cavallaro & Pratibha Rani & Santosh K. Nigam & Abbas Mardani, 2022. "Assessment of Battery Energy Storage Systems Using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Removal Effects of Criteria and the Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking Based on Compromise Solution Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Thore, Sten & Tarverdyan, Ruzanna, 2016. "The sustainable competitiveness of nations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 108-114.
    12. Gheorghe H. Popescu & Violeta Sima & Elvira Nica & Ileana Georgiana Gheorghe, 2017. "Measuring Sustainable Competitiveness in Contemporary Economies—Insights from European Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-26, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kara, Karahan & Yalçın, Galip Cihan & Simic, Vladimir & Baysal, Zeynep & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024. "The alternative ranking using two-step logarithmic normalization method for benchmarking the supply chain performance of countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Kara, Karahan & Yalçın, Galip Cihan & Çetinkaya, Aslı & Simic, Vladimir & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024. "A single-valued neutrosophic CIMAS-CRITIC-RBNAR decision support model for the financial performance analysis: A study of technology companies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Okanović & Jelena Ješić & Vladimir Đaković & Simonida Vukadinović & Andrea Andrejević Panić, 2021. "Increasing University Competitiveness through Assessment of Green Content in Curriculum and Eco-Labeling in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Catalin GRADINARU & Sorin-George TOMA & Stefan CATANA, 2021. "Sustainability And Competitiveness At The Global Level: An Analysis Of The Top 10 Countries In The Period 2018-2020," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 6(3), pages 121-128.
    3. Mohammad Soltani Delgosha & Tahereh Saheb & Nastaran Hajiheydari, 2021. "Modelling the Asymmetrical Relationships between Digitalisation and Sustainable Competitiveness: A Cross-Country Configurational Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1317-1337, September.
    4. Mohammad Soltani Delgosha & Tahereh Saheb & Nastaran Hajiheydari, 0. "Modelling the Asymmetrical Relationships between Digitalisation and Sustainable Competitiveness: A Cross-Country Configurational Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    5. Dana Kiseľáková & Beáta Šofranková & Veronika Čabinová & Erika Onuferová, 2018. "Competitiveness and sustainable growth analysis of the EU countries with the use of Global Indexes' methodology," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 581-599, March.
    6. Thore, Sten, 2022. "Sustainable development goal deficits and the Covid 19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Pätäri, Satu & Puumalainen, Kaisu & Jantunen, Ari & Sandstrüm, Jaana, 2011. "The interface of the energy and forest sectors--Potential players in the bioenergy business," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 322-332, May.
    8. Li, Ganglei & Shao, Yunfei, 2023. "How do top management team characteristics affect digital orientation? Exploring the internal driving forces of firm digitalization," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Quezada, Luis E. & Cordova, Felisa M. & Palominos, Pedro & Godoy, Katherine & Ross, Jocelyn, 2009. "Method for identifying strategic objectives in strategy maps," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 492-500, November.
    10. Amirmahmood Amini Sedeh & Rosa Caiazza & Amir Pezeshkan, 2023. "Unraveling the resource puzzle: exploring entrepreneurial resource management and the quest for new venture success," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 1552-1573, October.
    11. Arup Barua & Alexandra Ioanid, 2021. "Synergistic Competitive Advantage - The Modern Appeal of RBV and IO Theory in the Mergers and Acquisitions," Bulgarian Economic Papers bep-2021-06, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria // Center for Economic Theories and Policies at Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski, revised Jul 2021.
    12. Jeremy Tantely Ranjatoelina & Anne-Ryslène Zaoual, 2015. "Processus d’inclusion de ressources négativement perçues par le marché. Le cas d’un spécialiste de l’insertion par l’activité économique : le groupe Vitamine T," Post-Print hal-01987118, HAL.
    13. Dohyung Kim & Sun Go, 2020. "Human Capital and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    14. Shu-Yi Chi & Tsorng-Chyi Hwang & Li-Hsien Chien, 2023. "Business Policy and Competitiveness of Farmers’ Organizations—Empirical Evidence from Taiwan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Martinez, Marian Garcia & Poole, Nigel D., 2004. "Analysing Linkages between Strategy, Performance, Management Structure and Culture in the Spanish Fresh Produce Industry," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 7(4), pages 1-24.
    16. Cao, Qinwei & Qiu, Shunli & Huang, Jian, 2022. "Contradiction and mechanism analysis of science and technology input-output: Evidence from key universities in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Kevin J. Johnson & Joé T. Martineau & Saouré Kouamé & Gokhan Turgut & Serge Poisson-de-Haro, 2018. "On the Unethical Use of Privileged Information in Strategic Decision-Making: The Effects of Peers’ Ethicality, Perceived Cohesion, and Team Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 917-929, November.
    18. Tao Bai & Jialin Du & Angelo M. Solarino, 2018. "Performance of foreign subsidiaries “in” and “from” Asia: A review, synthesis and research agenda," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 607-638, September.
    19. Uzule Kristine & Verina Natalija, 2023. "Digital Barriers in Digital Transition and Digital Transformation: Literature Review," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 20(1), pages 125-143, June.
    20. Alic Bîrcă & Christiana Brigitte Sandu & Igor Matveiciuc, 2023. "Determinants of Public Institutions Competitiveness: Case Study of the Republic of Moldova," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0038012123002744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.