IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v37y2021i1s0956522120302529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A paradox rarely comes alone a quantitative approach to investigating knotted leadership paradoxes in SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Henriksen, Thomas Duus
  • Nielsen, Rikke Kristine
  • Vikkelsø, Signe
  • Bévort, Frans
  • Mogensen, Mette

Abstract

This article uses a paradox knotting perspective to study key leadership challenges among Danish manufacturing and crafting SMEs. As part of an action-learning development programme, 55 middle managers from 11 companies were asked to rate the topicality of 10 leadership paradoxes. Using exploratory factor analysis, three clusters of knotted paradoxes were identified concerning the management of 1) managing organisational flexibility, 2) balancing engagement and control, and 3) dealing with dispersion. Each identified knot consists of two paradoxes and shows how managers involved in one element of a knotted paradox are also likely to be involved in the tensions of the other.

Suggested Citation

  • Henriksen, Thomas Duus & Nielsen, Rikke Kristine & Vikkelsø, Signe & Bévort, Frans & Mogensen, Mette, 2021. "A paradox rarely comes alone a quantitative approach to investigating knotted leadership paradoxes in SMEs," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:37:y:2021:i:1:s0956522120302529
    DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2020.101135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522120302529
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.scaman.2020.101135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diether Gebert & Sabine Boerner & Eric Kearney, 2010. "Fostering Team Innovation: Why Is It Important to Combine Opposing Action Strategies?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 593-608, June.
    2. Sandra Waddock, 2019. "Shaping the Shift: Shamanic Leadership, Memes, and Transformation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 931-939, April.
    3. Manzoni, Beatrice & Volker, Leentje, 2017. "Paradoxes and management approaches of competing for work in creative professional service firms," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 23-35.
    4. Jean M. Bartunek & Kate Walsh & Catherine A. Lacey, 2000. "Dynamics and Dilemmas of Women Leading Women," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(6), pages 589-610, December.
    5. Lindberg, Ola & Rantatalo, Oscar & Hällgren, Markus, 2017. "Making sense through false syntheses: Working with paradoxes in the reorganization of the Swedish police," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 175-184.
    6. Gaim, Medhanie & Wåhlin, Nils, 2016. "In search of a creative space: A conceptual framework of synthesizing paradoxical tensions," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 33-44.
    7. Chris Changwha Chung & Paul W. Beamish, 2010. "The Trap of Continual Ownership Change in International Equity Joint Ventures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 995-1015, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miron-Spektor, Ella & Emich, Kyle J. & Argote, Linda & Smith, Wendy K., 2022. "Conceiving opposites together: Cultivating paradoxical frames and epistemic motivation fosters team creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. Gaim, Medhanie, 2018. "On the emergence and management of paradoxical tensions: The case of architectural firms," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 497-518.
    3. Schlaile, Michael P. & Bogner, Kristina & Muelder, Laura, 2021. "It’s more than complicated! Using organizational memetics to capture the complexity of organizational culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 801-812.
    4. Rieger, Verena & Klarmann, Martin, 2022. "The effect of cooperative team culture on innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1256-1271.
    5. Le Nguyen, Huu & Larimo, Jorma & Ali, Tahir, 2016. "How do ownership control position and national culture influence conflict resolution strategies in international joint ventures?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 559-568.
    6. Lee, Hyoungjin & Chung, Chris Changwha & Beamish, Paul W., 2019. "Configurational characteristics of mandate portfolios and their impact on foreign subsidiary survival," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(5), pages 1-1.
    7. Michele Williams & Evan Polman, 2015. "Is It Me or Her? How Gender Composition Evokes Interpersonally Sensitive Behavior on Collaborative Cross-Boundary Projects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 334-355, April.
    8. Nicholas Argyres, 2011. "Using Organizational Economics to Study Organizational Capability Development and Strategy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1138-1143, October.
    9. Hu, Wenan & Luo, Jinlian & Chen, Zhijun & Zhong, Jing, 2020. "Ambidextrous leaders helping newcomers get on board: Achieving adjustment and proaction through distinct pathways," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 406-414.
    10. Taewon Suh & Omar J. Khan & Benedikt Schnellbächer & Sven Heidenreich, 2019. "Strategic Accord And Tension For Business Model Innovation: Examining Different Tacit Knowledge Types And Open Action Strategies," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(04), pages 1-29, July.
    11. Christina Guenther & Simon Oertel & Peter Walgenbach, 2016. "It's all about Timing: Age–Dependent Consequences of Founder Exits and New Member Additions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(4), pages 843-865, July.
    12. Akie Iriyama & Weilei Shi & John Prescott, 2014. "Frequency and directional reversal of equity ownership change in international joint ventures," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 215-243, March.
    13. Owens, Martin & Ramsey, Elaine & Loane, Sharon, 2018. "Resolving post-formation challenges in shared IJVs: The impact of shared IJV structure on inter-partner relationships," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 584-593.
    14. Rigolini, Alessandra & Gabaldon, Patricia & Le Bruyn Goldeng, Eskil, 2021. "CEO succession with gender change in troubled companies: The effect of a new woman CEO on firm risk and firm risk perceived," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1).
    15. Jeffrey J. Reuer & Elko Klijn & Constantinos S. Lioukas, 2014. "Board involvement in international joint ventures," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(11), pages 1626-1644, November.
    16. Brorström, Sara, 2017. "The paradoxes of city strategy practice: Why some issues become strategically important and others do not," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 213-221.
    17. Jiao, Hao & Wang, Tang & Yang, Jifeng, 2022. "Team structure and invention impact under high knowledge diversity: An empirical examination of computer workstation industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    18. Chengguang Li & Oded Shenkar & William E. Newburry & Yinuo Tang, 2021. "How Country Reputation Differentials Influence Market Reaction to International Acquisitions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1609-1639, September.
    19. Miron-Spektor, Ella & Gino, Francesca & Argote, Linda, 2011. "Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 229-240.
    20. Jie Liang & Peng Shao, 2019. "Sequential Alliance Portfolios, Partner Reconfiguration and Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:37:y:2021:i:1:s0956522120302529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.