IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v8y2004i1p127-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analytical Alternatives In Intelligent Transportation System (Its) Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Haynes, Kingsley E.
  • Li, Ming

Abstract

The public/private partnership institutional structure of ITS and related externality and sustainability issues decrease the applicability and effectiveness of traditional ITS evaluation methods. Traditional cost-benefit analysis may not effectively address value-added, system perspective, and various uncertainties involved in ITS development and deployment. Two extensions of cost-benefit analysis are presented in this paper. The first extension tries to internalize positive externalities of ITS through productivity gain and economic surplus increase in an ITS region. The second extension incorporates system consideration into cost-benefit analysis by disaggregating direct gains from ITS into timesaving, increased interaction, and increased land-use activities. Next, an alternative cognitive approach is also introduced to represent the group priorities and the corresponding degree of uncertainty and consensus among group members with different levels of experiences and expertise within a new field such as ITS.

Suggested Citation

  • Haynes, Kingsley E. & Li, Ming, 2004. "Analytical Alternatives In Intelligent Transportation System (Its) Evaluation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 127-149, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:8:y:2004:i:1:p:127-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739-8859(04)08007-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger N. Rose, 1980. "Supply Shifts and Research Benefits: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(4), pages 834-837.
    2. James S. Dyer & Peter C. Fishburn & Ralph E. Steuer & Jyrki Wallenius & Stanley Zionts, 1992. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: The Next Ten Years," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 645-654, May.
    3. Haynes, Kingsley E & Krmenec, Andrew, 1989. "A Sensitivity Assessment of Uncertainty in Infrastructure Expansion," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 23(4), pages 299-309.
    4. Haynes, Kingsley E. & Krmenec, Andrew J. & Whittington, Dale & Georgianna, Thomas D. & Echelberger, Wayne Jr., 1984. "Planning for capacity expansion: Stochastic process and game-theoretic approaches," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 195-205.
    5. Jehiel, Philippe, 1991. "Polycentric Spatial Development, Externalities and Cost-Benefit Analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 25(3), pages 193-208, October.
    6. Martin, Fernand, 1994. "Sustainability, the Discount Rate, and Intergenerational Effects within a Regional Framework," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 28(1), pages 107-123, March.
    7. Tversky, Amos & Thaler, Richard H, 1990. "Anomalies: Preference Reversals," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 4(2), pages 201-211, Spring.
    8. Cooke, Stephen C, 1991. "The Role of Value Added in Benefit/Cost Analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 25(2), pages 145-149, July.
    9. P Jankowski, 1989. "Mixed-Data Multicriteria Evaluation for Regional Planning: A Systematic Approach to the Decisionmaking Process," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 21(3), pages 349-362, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Voula Psaraki & Ioanna Pagoni, 2012. "Capacity-Enhancing And Low-Ghg Emissions Intelligent Transport Systems (Its) Technologies," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(3), pages 11-24, December.
    2. repec:hrs:journl::y:2012:v:4:i:3:p:11-24 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edwards, Geoff W. & Freebairn, John W., 1982. "The Social Benefits from an Increase in Productivity in a Part of an Industry," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(02), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 0. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-42.
    3. Brennan, John P. & Singh, Rajinder Pal & Singh, Inder Pal, 1999. "Economic Issues in Assessing Research Priorities in Feed Grains Nutrition," 1999 Conference (43th), January 20-22, 1999, Christchurch, New Zealand 123789, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    4. Cooke, Stephen C., 1990. "The Role Of Value Added In Benefit/Cost Analysis," A.E. Research Series 140522, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    5. Stephan Schulmeister, 2000. "Technical Analysis and Exchange Rate Dynamics," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 25857.
    6. Ding, Chengri & Knaap, Gerrit J. & Hopkins, Lewis D., 1999. "Managing Urban Growth with Urban Growth Boundaries: A Theoretical Analysis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 53-68, July.
    7. Manel Baucells & Rakesh K. Sarin, 2003. "Group Decisions with Multiple Criteria," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(8), pages 1105-1118, August.
    8. W. Ukovich & S. Pastore & A. Premoli, 2001. "An Algorithm for Linearly-Constrained Piecewise Lexicographic Programming Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 195-226, October.
    9. Starmer, Chris, 1999. "Experimental Economics: Hard Science or Wasteful Tinkering?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 109(453), pages 5-15, February.
    10. Alexander Harin, 2024. "About a “Certain-uncertain†Inconsistency within the Generally Accepted Experimental Procedures of Behavioral Economics," International Journal of Economics and Financial Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 10(2), pages 17-30, 06-2024.
    11. Drew Fudenberg & David K. Levine & Zacharias Maniadis, 2012. "On the Robustness of Anchoring Effects in WTP and WTA Experiments," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 4(2), pages 131-145, May.
    12. Kim, Younjun, 2015. "Essays on firm location decisions, regional development and choices under risk," ISU General Staff Papers 201501010800005579, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. Dimitris Bertsimas & Allison O'Hair, 2013. "Learning Preferences Under Noise and Loss Aversion: An Optimization Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1190-1199, October.
    14. Yoichiro Fujii & Hajime Murakami & Yutaka Nakamura & Kazuhisa Takemura, 2023. "Multiattribute regret: theory and experimental study," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 95(4), pages 623-662, November.
    15. Henrik Andersson & James Hammitt & Gunnar Lindberg & Kristian Sundström, 2013. "Willingness to Pay and Sensitivity to Time Framing: A Theoretical Analysis and an Application on Car Safety," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 56(3), pages 437-456, November.
    16. Collins, D. & Poulter, David, 1990. "Estimation of Welfare Gains from the Parasite Control Program 'Wormkill'," 1990 Conference (34th), February 13-15, 1990, Brisbane, Australia 144925, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    17. Mullen, John D. & Alston, Julian M., 1995. "The Impact on the Australian Lamb Industry of Producing Larger Leaner Lamb," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(01), pages 1-19, April.
    18. A. C. Herruzo, 1992. "Producer Benefits From Technology Induced Supply Shifts In The Ec Cotton Regime," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 56-63, January.
    19. Chang, Yu-Hern & Yeh, Chung-Hsing, 2002. "A survey analysis of service quality for domestic airlines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 166-177, May.
    20. Dallas Burtraw & Samantha Sekar, 2014. "Two world views on carbon revenues," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 110-120, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:8:y:2004:i:1:p:127-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.