IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v27y1998i8p781-791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socialist academies of sciences: the enforced orientation of basic research at user needs

Author

Listed:
  • Mayntz, Renate

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Mayntz, Renate, 1998. "Socialist academies of sciences: the enforced orientation of basic research at user needs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 781-791, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:27:y:1998:i:8:p:781-791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048-7333(98)00090-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gläser, Jochen & Meske, Werner, 1996. "Anwendungsorientierung von Grundlagenforschung? Erfahrungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 25, number 25.
    2. Hohn, Hans-Willy & Schimank, Uwe, 1990. "Konflikte und Gleichgewichte im Forschungssystem: Akteurkonstellationen und Entwicklungspfade in der staatlich finanzierten außeruniversitären Forschung," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 7, number 7.
    3. Braun, Dietmar, 1997. "Die politische Steuerung der Wissenschaft: Ein Beitrag zum "kooperativen Staat"," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 28, number 28.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Blandine LAPERCHE & Dimitri UZUNIDIS, 2010. "La valorisation de la recherche publique en France et la question de l’université (The commercialization of public research in france and the issue of university)," Working Papers 16, Réseau de Recherche sur l’Innovation. / Research Network on Innovation.
    2. Wyrwich, Michael & Steinberg, Philip J. & Noseleit, Florian & de Faria, Pedro, 2022. "Is open innovation imprinted on new ventures? The cooperation-inhibiting legacy of authoritarian regimes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    3. Blandine Laperche, 2002. "Facteurs de valorisation de la recherche publique quelles perspectives pour une jeune université dans un contexte de crise ? (Incentive factors for the exploitation of public research prospects for a ," Working Papers 53, Laboratoire de Recherche sur l'Industrie et l'Innovation. ULCO / Research Unit on Industry and Innovation.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meske, Werner, 1998. "Institutional transformation of S&T systems in the European economies in transition: Comparative analysis," Discussion Papers, Working Group Transformation of Science Systems P 98-403, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Schimank, Uwe & Stucke, Andreas (ed.), 1994. "Coping with Trouble: How Science Reacts to Political Disturbances of Research Conditions," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 14, number 14.
    3. Lengwiler, Martin, 2005. "Probleme anwendungsorientierter Forschung in den Sozialwissenschaften am Beispiel der Ausgründung choice," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2005-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Mark Lehrer, 2007. "Organizing knowledge spillovers when basic and applied research are interdependent: German biotechnology policy in historical perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 277-296, June.
    5. Jochen Gläser & Grit Laudel, 2001. "Integrating Scientometric Indicators into Sociological Studies: Methodical and Methodological Problems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(3), pages 411-434, November.
    6. Heinze, Thomas & Kuhlmann, Stefan, 2006. "Analysis of heterogeneous collaboration in the German research system with a focus on nanotechnology," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 6, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    7. Fritz W. Scharpf, 1991. "Response to Steven J. Brams and Bruno S. Frey," Rationality and Society, , vol. 3(2), pages 261-265, April.
    8. Gülker, Silke & Matthies, Hildegard & Matthäus, Sandra, 2009. "Evaluationsverfahren aus laborkonstruktivistischer Perspektive," Discussion Papers, Research Group Science Policy Studies SP III 2009-601, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    9. Heinze, Thomas & Kuhlmann, Stefan, 2008. "Across institutional boundaries?: Research collaboration in German public sector nanoscience," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 888-899, June.
    10. Giesecke, Susanne, 2000. "The contrasting roles of government in the development of biotechnology industry in the US and Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 205-223, February.
    11. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1991. "Die Handlungsfähigkeit des Staates am Ende des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts," MPIfG Discussion Paper 91/10, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    12. Ann Hipp & Björn Jindra & Kehinde Medase, 2023. "Nothing new in the East? New evidence on productivity effects of inventions in the GDR," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2301, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    13. Mayntz, Renate, 2001. "Die Bestimmung von Forschungsthemen in Max-Planck-Instituten im Spannungsfeld wissenschaftlicher und außerwissenschaftlicher Interessen: Ein Forschungsbericht," MPIfG Discussion Paper 01/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    14. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1988. "Decision Rules, Decision Styles, and Policy Choices," MPIfG Discussion Paper 88/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    15. Mayntz, Renate, 1991. "Modernization and the Logic of Interorganizational Networks," MPIfG Discussion Paper 91/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    16. Grande, Edgar, 2001. "The erosion of state capacity and the European innovation policy dilemma: A comparison of German and EU information technology policies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 905-921, June.
    17. Braun, Dietmar, 1993. "Politische Steuerungsfähigkeit in intermediären Systemen am Beispiel der Forschungsförderung," MPIfG Discussion Paper 93/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    18. Meske, Werner (Ed.) & Thinh, Dang Duy (Ed.), 2000. "Vietnam's research and development system in the 1990s: Structural and functional change. Research report," Discussion Papers, Working Group Transformation of Science Systems P 00-401, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    19. Lehrer, Mark & Asakawa, Kazuhiro & Behnam, Michael, 2011. "Home base-compensating R&D: Indicators, public policy, and ramifications for multinational firms," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 42-53, March.
    20. Marin, Bernd & Mayntz, Renate (ed.), 1991. "Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 9, number 9.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:27:y:1998:i:8:p:781-791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.