IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v95y2018icp48-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental sustainability of corn (Zea mays L.) production on the basis of nitrogen fertilizer application: The case of Lahijan, Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Sadeghi, Seyyed Mustafa
  • Noorhosseini, Seyyed Ali
  • Damalas, Christos A.

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in Lahijan, Iran to determine the environmental impact of four corn (Zea mays L.) genotypes production under three nitrogen (N) fertilizer application rates using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Treatments consisted of three N levels (300, 400, and 500 kg ha−1 of urea) and four corn genotypes (KSC 647, KSC 700, KSC 704, and a local variety). Six impact categories, i.e., global warming, acidification, terrestrial eutrophication, depletion of fossil resources, depletion of potassium resources and depletion of phosphate resources, were determined. There was an increasing trend in grain yield with increasing N rate from 300 to 400 kg ha−1, but further increase in N rate (500 kg ha−1) was not beneficial for all genotypes. The highest grain yield (14.49 t ha−1) was observed for the hybrid KSC 647. The maximum values of environmental index (1.53) and resources depletion index (1.11) were determined in the production of one tonne of grain yield for the local corn variety treated with 500 kg ha−1 of urea. The production of one tonne of grain yield by the hybrid KSC 647 treated with 300 kg ha−1 of urea emitted the least amounts of NH3, N2O, NOX, CO2, CH4, and SO2 (2.158, 0.368, 0.449, 64.510, 0.090, and 0.115 kg per tonne of grain yield of corn, respectively). The selection of superior genotypes in terms of grain yield and low N consumption showed lower damage to the environment. The use of high-yielding genotypes increases productivity and alleviates the environmental impact of production.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadeghi, Seyyed Mustafa & Noorhosseini, Seyyed Ali & Damalas, Christos A., 2018. "Environmental sustainability of corn (Zea mays L.) production on the basis of nitrogen fertilizer application: The case of Lahijan, Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 48-55.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:95:y:2018:i:c:p:48-55
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118305082
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F. Fallahpour & A. Aminghafouri & A. Ghalegolab Behbahani & M. Bannayan, 2012. "The environmental impact assessment of wheat and barley production by using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 979-992, December.
    2. Tiffany L. Fess & James B. Kotcon & Vagner A. Benedito, 2011. "Crop Breeding for Low Input Agriculture: A Sustainable Response to Feed a Growing World Population," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(10), pages 1-31, October.
    3. Tzilivakis, J. & Warner, D.J. & May, M. & Lewis, K.A. & Jaggard, K., 2005. "An assessment of the energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) production in the UK," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 101-119, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adnan Abbas & Chengyi Zhao & Waheed Ullah & Riaz Ahmad & Muhammad Waseem & Jianting Zhu, 2021. "Towards Sustainable Farm Production System: A Case Study of Corn Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Qu, Ziren & Luo, Ning & Guo, Jiameng & Xu, Jie & Wang, Pu & Meng, Qingfeng, 2024. "Enhancing sustainability in the new variety-based low emergy system for maize production by nitrogen optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Fernando Shintate Galindo & Jeffrey S. Strock & Paulo Humberto Pagliari, 2021. "Nutrient Accumulation Affected by Corn Stover Management Associated with Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilization," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Mattias Gaglio & Elena Tamburini & Francesco Lucchesi & Vassilis Aschonitis & Anna Atti & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Elisa Anna Fano, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of Maize-Germ Oil Production and the Use of Bioenergy to Mitigate Environmental Impacts: A Gate-To-Gate Case Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikkhah, Amin & Royan, Mahsa & Khojastehpour, Mehdi & Bacenetti, Jacopo, 2017. "Environmental impacts modeling of Iranian peach production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 677-682.
    2. Seyyed Ali Noorhosseini & Christos A. Damalas, 2018. "RETRACTED: Environmental Impact of Peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) Production under Different Levels of Nitrogen Fertilization," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1, July.
    3. Zadehdabagh, Nasim & Monavari, Seyed Masoud & Kargari, Nargess & Taghavi, Lobat & Pirasteh, Saeid, 2022. "Sustainability of agroecosystems by indices: A comparative study between indicators of ecological footprint sustainability and emergy analysis; a case study in Dez catchment, Iran," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 474(C).
    4. Keikha, Mahdi & Darzi- Naftchali, Abdullah & Motevali, Ali & Valipour, Mohammad, 2023. "Effect of nitrogen management on the environmental and economic sustainability of wheat production in different climates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    5. Šarauskis, Egidijus & Masilionytė, Laura & Juknevičius, Darius & Buragienė, Sidona & Kriaučiūnienė, Zita, 2019. "Energy use efficiency, GHG emissions, and cost-effectiveness of organic and sustainable fertilisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1151-1160.
    6. Zhen, Wei & Qin, Quande & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Spatio-temporal patterns of energy consumption-related GHG emissions in China's crop production systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 274-284.
    7. Šarauskis, Egidijus & Romaneckas, Kęstutis & Jasinskas, Algirdas & Kimbirauskienė, Rasa & Naujokienė, Vilma, 2020. "Improving energy efficiency and environmental mitigation through tillage management in faba bean production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. Władysław Szempliński & Bogdan Dubis & Krzysztof Michał Lachutta & Krzysztof Józef Jankowski, 2021. "Energy Optimization in Different Production Technologies of Winter Triticale Grain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, February.
    9. Vasileios Greveniotis & Elisavet Bouloumpasi & Stylianos Zotis & Athanasios Korkovelos & Constantinos G. Ipsilandis, 2021. "Assessment of Interactions between Yield Components of Common Vetch Cultivars in Both Conventional and Low-Input Cultivation Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Ozkan, Burhan & Ceylan, R. Figen & Kizilay, Hatice, 2011. "Comparison of energy inputs in glasshouse double crop (fall and summer crops) tomato production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1639-1644.
    11. Olfa Gharsallah & Claudio Gandolfi & Arianna Facchi, 2021. "Methodologies for the Sustainability Assessment of Agricultural Production Systems, with a Focus on Rice: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Kumar, Rohit & Bhardwaj, Arvind & Singh, Lakhwinder Pal & Singh, Gurraj, 2023. "Quantifying ecological impacts: A comparative life cycle assessment of conventional and organic potato cultivation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    13. Guillermo Alexis Vergel-Rangel & Pablo Emilio Escamilla-García & Raúl Horacio Camarillo-López & Jair Azael Esquivel-Guzmán & Francisco Pérez-Soto, 2021. "The environmental impact of nopal (Opuntia ficus-indica) production in Mexico City, Mexico through a life cycle assessment (LCA)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18068-18095, December.
    14. Nikouei, Alireza & Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza & Marzban, Zahra, 2022. "Modeling land allocation to produce crops under economic and environmental goals in Iran: a multi-objective programming approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    15. Houshyar, Ehsan & Grundmann, Philipp, 2017. "Environmental impacts of energy use in wheat tillage systems: A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) study in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 11-24.
    16. Żyłowski, Tomasz & Kozyra, Jerzy, 2020. "Environmental Efficiency Of Root Crop Cultivation," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2020(3).
    17. Óscar del Hierro & Patricia Gallejones & Gerardo Besga & Ainara Artetxe & Carlos Garbisu, 2021. "A Comparison of IPCC Guidelines and Allocation Methods to Estimate the Environmental Impact of Barley Production in the Basque Country through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Evanthia A. Nanaki & Christopher J. Koroneos, 2018. "Sustainable Peach Compote Production: A Life Cycle Thinking Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Hu, Ming-Che & Chen, Yu-Hui & Huang, Li-Chun, 2014. "A sustainable vegetable supply chain using plant factories in Taiwanese markets: A Nash–Cournot model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 49-56.
    20. Wood, Richard & Lenzen, Manfred & Dey, Christopher & Lundie, Sven, 2006. "A comparative study of some environmental impacts of conventional and organic farming in Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 89(2-3), pages 324-348, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:95:y:2018:i:c:p:48-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.