IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v474y2022ics0304380022002666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability of agroecosystems by indices: A comparative study between indicators of ecological footprint sustainability and emergy analysis; a case study in Dez catchment, Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Zadehdabagh, Nasim
  • Monavari, Seyed Masoud
  • Kargari, Nargess
  • Taghavi, Lobat
  • Pirasteh, Saeid

Abstract

Efficient farm management is one of the most important issues in achieving Sustainable performance. Ecological Footprint (EF) measurement and Emergy Analysis (EA) are appropriate tools to achieve the principles of sustainability in different ecosystems. This study aimed to compare the indicators and determine the ecological sustainability of two cropping systems of irrigated wheat and grain maize using ecological footprint evaluation and emergy analysis in the catchment area of Dez in Iran in the crop year 2019–2020. For this purpose, a total of 400 questionnaires from wheat and maize farmers were collected based on a simple random sampling method. The results of evaluating the ecological footprint method of wheat and maize cultivation in the study area at the level of one hectare were 3.50 and 4.66 global hectares, respectively. Also, the results of total emergy inputs for the ecological system of wheat and maize production were 1.60E+16 and 2.55E+16 sej ha−1 per year, respectively. This study showed that the two methods EF and EA are complementary. The evaluation results of both sustainability indices were very close to each other so both cultivation systems were environmentally unsustainable. We also found that the ecosystem of the irrigated wheat production system is more desirable than the ecosystem of the maize production system in terms of yield, renewability, and environmental sustainability. Since both cropping systems are strongly affected by the purchased inputs (more than 95%), as a result, they create a high environmental pressure, which shows the apprehensive condition of the current agricultural production systems in Iran. This study is the first study from Iran that uses these two tools simultaneously to determine the sustainability assessment of two strategic products of the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Zadehdabagh, Nasim & Monavari, Seyed Masoud & Kargari, Nargess & Taghavi, Lobat & Pirasteh, Saeid, 2022. "Sustainability of agroecosystems by indices: A comparative study between indicators of ecological footprint sustainability and emergy analysis; a case study in Dez catchment, Iran," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 474(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:474:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022002666
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022002666
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F. Fallahpour & A. Aminghafouri & A. Ghalegolab Behbahani & M. Bannayan, 2012. "The environmental impact assessment of wheat and barley production by using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 979-992, December.
    2. Amiri, Zahra & Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza & Campbell, Daniel E. & Armin, Mohammad, 2020. "Extended exergy analysis (EAA) of two canola farming systems in Khorramabad, Iran," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Çetin, Bahattin & Vardar, Ali, 2008. "An economic analysis of energy requirements and input costs for tomato production in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 428-433.
    4. Pata, Ugur Korkut, 2021. "Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: A sustainability perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 197-208.
    5. Canakci, M. & Akinci, I., 2006. "Energy use pattern analyses of greenhouse vegetable production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1243-1256.
    6. Wang, Xiaolong & Chen, Yuanquan & Sui, Peng & Gao, Wangsheng & Qin, Feng & Zhang, Jiansheng & Wu, Xia, 2014. "Emergy analysis of grain production systems on large-scale farms in the North China Plain based on LCA," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 66-78.
    7. Tzilivakis, J. & Warner, D.J. & May, M. & Lewis, K.A. & Jaggard, K., 2005. "An assessment of the energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) production in the UK," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 101-119, August.
    8. Bastianoni, S. & Campbell, D.E. & Ridolfi, R. & Pulselli, F.M., 2009. "The solar transformity of petroleum fuels," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 40-50.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parras, Rafael & de Mendonça, Gislaine Costa & da Costa, Luis Miguel & Rocha, Juan Ricardo & Costa, Renata Cristina Araújo & Valera, Carlos Alberto & Fernandes, Luís Filipe Sanches & Pacheco, Fernando, 2024. "Land use footprints and policies in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza & Amiri, Zahra & Campbell, Daniel E., 2020. "Evaluation of the sustainability of four greenhouse vegetable production ecosystems based on an analysis of emergy and social characteristics”," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 424(C).
    2. Castoldi, Nicola & Bechini, Luca & Ferrante, Antonio, 2011. "Fossil energy usage for the production of baby leaves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 86-93.
    3. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Zhixin & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2022. "Application of an artificial neural network to optimise energy inputs: An energy- and cost-saving strategy for commercial poultry farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    4. Nikouei, Alireza & Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza & Marzban, Zahra, 2022. "Modeling land allocation to produce crops under economic and environmental goals in Iran: a multi-objective programming approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    5. Hu, Ming-Che & Chen, Yu-Hui & Huang, Li-Chun, 2014. "A sustainable vegetable supply chain using plant factories in Taiwanese markets: A Nash–Cournot model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 49-56.
    6. Hamedani, Sara Rajabi & Shabani, Zeinab & Rafiee, Shahin, 2011. "Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in potato production in Hamadan province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2367-2371.
    7. Nikkhah, Amin & Royan, Mahsa & Khojastehpour, Mehdi & Bacenetti, Jacopo, 2017. "Environmental impacts modeling of Iranian peach production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 677-682.
    8. Elsoragaby, Suha & Yahya, Azmi & Mahadi, Muhammad Razif & Nawi, Nazmi Mat & Mairghany, Modather, 2019. "Energy utilization in major crop cultivation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1285-1303.
    9. Samavatean, Naeimeh & Rafiee, Shahin & Mobli, Hossein & Mohammadi, Ali, 2011. "An analysis of energy use and relation between energy inputs and yield, costs and income of garlic production in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1808-1813.
    10. Rajabi Hamedani, Sara & Keyhani, Alireza & Alimardani, Reza, 2011. "Energy use patterns and econometric models of grape production in Hamadan province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6345-6351.
    11. Pishgar-Komleh, S.H. & Sefeedpari, P. & Rafiee, S., 2011. "Energy and economic analysis of rice production under different farm levels in Guilan province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5824-5831.
    12. Elhami, Behzad & Ghasemi Nejad Raini, Mahmoud & Soheili-Fard, Farshad, 2019. "Energy and environmental indices through life cycle assessment of raisin production: A case study (Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province, Iran)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 507-515.
    13. Pérez-Alonso, J. & Pérez-García, M. & Pasamontes-Romera, M. & Callejón-Ferre, A.J., 2012. "Performance analysis and neural modelling of a greenhouse integrated photovoltaic system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4675-4685.
    14. Sadeghi, Seyyed Mustafa & Noorhosseini, Seyyed Ali & Damalas, Christos A., 2018. "Environmental sustainability of corn (Zea mays L.) production on the basis of nitrogen fertilizer application: The case of Lahijan, Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 48-55.
    15. Seyyed Ali Noorhosseini & Christos A. Damalas, 2018. "RETRACTED: Environmental Impact of Peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) Production under Different Levels of Nitrogen Fertilization," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1, July.
    16. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Rafiee, Shahin & Omid, Mahmoud & Mousazadeh, Hossein, 2013. "Reduction of CO2 emission by improving energy use efficiency of greenhouse cucumber production using DEA approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 676-682.
    17. Rafiee, Shahin & Mousavi Avval, Seyed Hashem & Mohammadi, Ali, 2010. "Modeling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3301-3306.
    18. Wei, Yu & Wang, Yizhi & Vigne, Samuel A. & Ma, Zhenyu, 2023. "Alarming contagion effects: The dangerous ripple effect of extreme price spillovers across crude oil, carbon emission allowance, and agriculture futures markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Tabatabaie, Seyed Mohammad Hossein & Rafiee, Shahin & Keyhani, Alireza, 2012. "Energy consumption flow and econometric models of two plum cultivars productions in Tehran province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 211-216.
    20. Rugani, B. & Pulselli, R.M. & Niccolucci, V. & Bastianoni, S., 2011. "Environmental performance of a XIV Century water management system: An emergy evaluation of cultural heritage," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 117-125.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:474:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022002666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.