IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v52y2015icp1331-1339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revised receiver efficiency of molten-salt power towers

Author

Listed:
  • Rodriguez-Sanchez, M.R.
  • Sanchez-Gonzalez, A.
  • Santana, D.

Abstract

The demonstration power plant Solar Two was the pioneer design of a molten-salt power tower. In the report “Final Test and Evaluation Results from the Solar Two Project” (Pacheco, 2002, [15]) the efficiencies of the three main subsystems: heliostats, receiver and power block were measured or estimated. The efficiency of the global plant and the power block could be obtained with confidence, whereas the efficiencies of the heliostat field and the receiver could only be estimated because the solar flux reflected by the heliostats and intercepted by the receiver cannot be measured. The receiver efficiency was estimated using the Power-On Method. The authors themselves highlighted that this method contain an important assumption: the temperature distribution on the receiver surface is independent of the incident power level. This assumption is equivalent to have a Biot number much smaller than one for the solar receivers operation, fixed inlet and outlet salt temperature. For Solar Two reported data the Biot number is of order unity, and then the external tube temperature depends on the receiver load; and the thermal losses vary linearly with the incident solar flux rather than constant. Besides, our results show that receiver efficiency is around 76% for full load and 69% for half load instead of 87% and 80% reported when external tube temperature was assumed to be independent on the incident power.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodriguez-Sanchez, M.R. & Sanchez-Gonzalez, A. & Santana, D., 2015. "Revised receiver efficiency of molten-salt power towers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1331-1339.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:52:y:2015:i:c:p:1331-1339
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115008461
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sánchez-González, Alberto & Santana, Domingo, 2015. "Solar flux distribution on central receivers: A projection method from analytic function," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 576-587.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.R. & Leray, C. & Toutant, A. & Ferriere, A. & Olalde, G., 2019. "Development of a new method to estimate the incident solar flux on central receivers from deteriorated heliostats," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 182-190.
    2. Ronny Gueguen & Benjamin Grange & Françoise Bataille & Samuel Mer & Gilles Flamant, 2020. "Shaping High Efficiency, High Temperature Cavity Tubular Solar Central Receivers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Laporte-Azcué, M. & Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.R. & González-Gómez, P.A. & Santana, D., 2021. "Assessment of the time resolution used to estimate the central solar receiver lifetime," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    4. Gómez-Hernández, J. & González-Gómez, P.A. & Briongos, J.V. & Santana, D., 2018. "Influence of the steam generator on the exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of solar tower plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 313-328.
    5. Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.R. & Sánchez-González, A. & Santana, D., 2019. "Field-receiver model validation against Solar Two tests," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 43-52.
    6. Laporte-Azcué, M. & González-Gómez, P.A. & Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.R. & Santana, D., 2022. "A procedure to predict solar receiver damage during transient conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Jiabin Fang & Mumtaz A. Qaisrani & Nan Tu & Jinjia Wei & Zhenjie Wan & Yabin Jin & Muhammad Khalid & Naveed Ahmed, 2022. "Experiment and Numerical Analysis of Thermal Performance of a Billboard External Receiver," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Conroy, Tim & Collins, Maurice N. & Grimes, Ronan, 2020. "A review of steady-state thermal and mechanical modelling on tubular solar receivers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeng, Zhichen & Ni, Dong & Xiao, Gang, 2022. "Real-time heliostat field aiming strategy optimization based on reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    2. Huang, Weidong & Yu, Liang, 2018. "Development of a new flux density function for a focusing heliostat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 358-375.
    3. Wang, Wen-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Cheng, Ze-Dong & Li, Dong & Liu, Zhan-Bin, 2021. "Coupled optical-thermal-stress characteristics of a multi-tube external molten salt receiver for the next generation concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. Huang, Weidong & Sun, Lulening, 2016. "Solar flux density calculation for a heliostat with an elliptical Gaussian distribution source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 434-441.
    5. Conroy, Tim & Collins, Maurice N. & Grimes, Ronan, 2020. "A review of steady-state thermal and mechanical modelling on tubular solar receivers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. He, Caitou & Zhao, Hanli & He, Qi & Zhao, Yuhong & Feng, Jieqing, 2021. "Analytical radiative flux model via convolution integral and image plane mapping," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    7. Speetzen, N. & Richter, P., 2021. "Dynamic aiming strategy for central receiver systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 55-67.
    8. Sánchez-González, Alberto & Rodríguez-Sánchez, María Reyes & Santana, Domingo, 2018. "Aiming factor to flatten the flux distribution on cylindrical receivers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 113-125.
    9. Messaoud Hazmoune & Benaoumeur Aour & Xavier Chesneau & Mohammed Debbache & Dana-Alexandra Ciupageanu & Gheorghe Lazaroiu & Mohamed Mondji Hadjiat & Abderrahmane Hamidat, 2020. "Numerical Analysis of a Solar Tower Receiver Novel Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-12, August.
    10. Chen, Jinli & Xiao, Gang & Xu, Haoran & Zhou, Xin & Yang, Jiamin & Ni, Mingjiang & Cen, Kefa, 2022. "Experiment and dynamic simulation of a solar tower collector system for power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 946-958.
    11. Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.R. & Leray, C. & Toutant, A. & Ferriere, A. & Olalde, G., 2019. "Development of a new method to estimate the incident solar flux on central receivers from deteriorated heliostats," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 182-190.
    12. Wang, Wen-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Jiang, Rui & Cheng, Ze-Dong & He, Ya-Ling, 2022. "A comparison between lumped parameter method and computational fluid dynamics method for steady and transient optical-thermal characteristics of the molten salt receiver in solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    13. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Xue, Xiao-Dai & Du, Bao-Cun, 2017. "Multi-objective optimization of the aiming strategy for the solar power tower with a cavity receiver by using the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 399-416.
    14. Ashley, Thomas & Carrizosa, Emilio & Fernández-Cara, Enrique, 2017. "Optimisation of aiming strategies in Solar Power Tower plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 285-291.
    15. Chen, Yuxuan & Zhang, Yanping & Wang, Ding & Hu, Song & Huang, Xiaohong, 2021. "Effects of design parameters on fatigue–creep damage of tubular supercritical carbon dioxide power tower receivers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 520-532.
    16. Qiu, Yu & He, Ya-Ling & Li, Peiwen & Du, Bao-Cun, 2017. "A comprehensive model for analysis of real-time optical performance of a solar power tower with a multi-tube cavity receiver," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 589-603.
    17. Lin, Xiaoxia & He, Caitou & Huang, Wenjun & Zhao, Yuhong & Feng, Jieqing, 2022. "GPU-based Monte Carlo ray tracing simulation considering refraction for central receiver system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 367-382.
    18. Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.R. & Sánchez-González, A. & González-Gómez, P.A. & Marugán-Cruz, C. & Santana, D., 2017. "Thermodynamic and economic assessment of a new generation of subcritical and supercritical solar power towers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 534-544.
    19. Jin, Yabin & Fang, Jiabin & Wei, Jinjia & Qaisrani, Mumtaz A. & Wang, Xinhe, 2019. "Thermal performance evaluation of a cavity receiver based on particle's radiation properties during the day time," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 622-636.
    20. Collado, Francisco J. & Guallar, Jesus, 2019. "Quick design of regular heliostat fields for commercial solar tower power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 115-125.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:52:y:2015:i:c:p:1331-1339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.