IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v301y2021ics0306261921008412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the time resolution used to estimate the central solar receiver lifetime

Author

Listed:
  • Laporte-Azcué, M.
  • Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.R.
  • González-Gómez, P.A.
  • Santana, D.

Abstract

This study assesses the impact of the time resolution and design day on the estimated lifetime of the molten-salt external tubular receiver of a solar power tower, one of the most damaged components of these facilities, considering operation under clear conditions. A global analysis is performed by first determining the heliostat field aiming strategy; the receiver operation limits are set to keep a low enough film temperature and to avoid the stress reset. The former prevents excessive corrosion rates of the tubes while the latter assures the global stress relaxation, which significantly reduces their damage during the receiver cyclic operation. Time steps of 60, 30, 15, 5 and 1 min are tested considering the spring equinox design day, as well as only solar noon conditions. The latter significantly underpredicts the receiver lifetime with respect to the 1-min case, being early discarded. The lifetime in the most damaged panel is underestimated over 18% and 16% using the 60- and 30-minute time steps, dropping to 2.57% using the 5-min time step at a reasonable computational cost. Finer resolutions enable more precise aiming strategy selection, decreasing the receiver peak fluxes. Lastly, a set of 8 representative days for the year, equally spaced in solar height, is more accurate than using the spring equinox alone, which results in an underestimate of the receiver lifetime that may be overly conservative. The summer solstice is the least-damaging day, with the lifetime decreasing as approaching the winter one, as long as the storage tank is filled.

Suggested Citation

  • Laporte-Azcué, M. & Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.R. & González-Gómez, P.A. & Santana, D., 2021. "Assessment of the time resolution used to estimate the central solar receiver lifetime," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:301:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921008412
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921008412
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sánchez-González, Alberto & Rodríguez-Sánchez, María Reyes & Santana, Domingo, 2018. "Aiming factor to flatten the flux distribution on cylindrical receivers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 113-125.
    2. Conroy, Tim & Collins, Maurice N. & Grimes, Ronan, 2020. "A review of steady-state thermal and mechanical modelling on tubular solar receivers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Rodriguez-Sanchez, M.R. & Sanchez-Gonzalez, A. & Santana, D., 2015. "Revised receiver efficiency of molten-salt power towers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1331-1339.
    4. Qiu, Yu & He, Ya-Ling & Li, Peiwen & Du, Bao-Cun, 2017. "A comprehensive model for analysis of real-time optical performance of a solar power tower with a multi-tube cavity receiver," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 589-603.
    5. Meybodi, Mehdi Aghaei & Ramirez Santigosa, Lourdes & Beath, Andrew C., 2017. "A study on the impact of time resolution in solar data on the performance modelling of CSP plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 551-563.
    6. Taler, Jan & Dzierwa, Piotr & Jaremkiewicz, Magdalena & Taler, Dawid & Kaczmarski, Karol & Trojan, Marcin & Sobota, Tomasz, 2019. "Thermal stress monitoring in thick walled pressure components of steam boilers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 645-666.
    7. Conroy, Tim & Collins, Maurice N. & Fisher, James & Grimes, Ronan, 2018. "Thermal and mechanical analysis of a sodium-cooled solar receiver operating under a novel heliostat aiming point strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 590-614.
    8. Sánchez-González, Alberto & Santana, Domingo, 2015. "Solar flux distribution on central receivers: A projection method from analytic function," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 576-587.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laporte-Azcué, M. & González-Gómez, P.A. & Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.R. & Santana, D., 2022. "A procedure to predict solar receiver damage during transient conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Conroy, Tim & Collins, Maurice N. & Grimes, Ronan, 2020. "A review of steady-state thermal and mechanical modelling on tubular solar receivers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.R. & Sánchez-González, A. & Santana, D., 2019. "Field-receiver model validation against Solar Two tests," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 43-52.
    3. Wang, Wen-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Cheng, Ze-Dong & Li, Dong & Liu, Zhan-Bin, 2021. "Coupled optical-thermal-stress characteristics of a multi-tube external molten salt receiver for the next generation concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. García, Jesús & Barraza, Rodrigo & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Vásquez-Padilla, Ricardo & Acosta, David & Estay, Danilo & Valdivia, Patricio, 2022. "Transient simulation of a control strategy for solar receivers based on mass flow valves adjustments and heliostats aiming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1221-1244.
    5. Zeng, Zhichen & Ni, Dong & Xiao, Gang, 2022. "Real-time heliostat field aiming strategy optimization based on reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    6. Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.R. & Leray, C. & Toutant, A. & Ferriere, A. & Olalde, G., 2019. "Development of a new method to estimate the incident solar flux on central receivers from deteriorated heliostats," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 182-190.
    7. Wang, Wen-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Jiang, Rui & Cheng, Ze-Dong & He, Ya-Ling, 2022. "A comparison between lumped parameter method and computational fluid dynamics method for steady and transient optical-thermal characteristics of the molten salt receiver in solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    8. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Xue, Xiao-Dai & Du, Bao-Cun, 2017. "Multi-objective optimization of the aiming strategy for the solar power tower with a cavity receiver by using the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 399-416.
    9. Wang, Shuang & Asselineau, Charles-Alexis & Fontalvo, Armando & Wang, Ye & Logie, William & Pye, John & Coventry, Joe, 2023. "Co-optimisation of the heliostat field and receiver for concentrated solar power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    10. Collado, Francisco J. & Guallar, Jesus, 2019. "Quick design of regular heliostat fields for commercial solar tower power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 115-125.
    11. Zecan Tu & Daniela Piccioni Koch & Nenad Sarunac & Martin Frank & Junkui Mao, 2021. "Thermal Analysis of a Solar External Receiver Tube with a Novel Component of Guide Vanes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Conroy, Tim & Collins, Maurice N. & Fisher, James & Grimes, Ronan, 2018. "Thermal and mechanical analysis of a sodium-cooled solar receiver operating under a novel heliostat aiming point strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 590-614.
    13. Wang, Qiliang & Li, Guiqiang & Cao, Jingyu & Hu, Mingke & Pei, Gang & Yang, Hongxing, 2022. "An analytical study on optimal spectral characters of solar absorbing coating and thermal performance potential of solar power tower," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1300-1315.
    14. Wang, Wen-Qi & Qiu, Yu & Li, Ming-Jia & He, Ya-Ling & Cheng, Ze-Dong, 2020. "Coupled optical and thermal performance of a fin-like molten salt receiver for the next-generation solar power tower," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    15. Conroy, Tim & Collins, Maurice N. & Grimes, Ronan, 2019. "Sodium receiver designs for integration with high temperature power cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    16. Laporte-Azcué, M. & González-Gómez, P.A. & Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.R. & Santana, D., 2022. "A procedure to predict solar receiver damage during transient conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Ballestrín, J. & Casanova, M. & Monterreal, R. & Fernández-Reche, J. & Setien, E. & Rodríguez, J. & Galindo, J. & Barbero, F.J. & Batlles, F.J., 2019. "Simplifying the measurement of high solar irradiance on receivers. Application to solar tower plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 551-561.
    18. Ronny Gueguen & Benjamin Grange & Françoise Bataille & Samuel Mer & Gilles Flamant, 2020. "Shaping High Efficiency, High Temperature Cavity Tubular Solar Central Receivers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    19. Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.R. & Laporte-Azcué, M. & Montoya, A. & Hernández-Jiménez, F., 2022. "Non-conventional tube shapes for lifetime extend of solar external receivers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 535-546.
    20. Ferdowsi, Farzad & Mehraeen, Shahab & Upton, Gregory B., 2020. "Assessing distribution network sensitivity to voltage rise and flicker under high penetration of behind-the-meter solar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1227-1240.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:301:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921008412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.