IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v42y2015icp672-680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon footprints of production and use of liquid biofuels in Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Eshton, Bilha
  • Katima, Jamidu H.Y.

Abstract

Tanzania being a prospective producer and exporter of liquid biofuels, information on local contribution of this sector to the environmental burden of the country is highly required in order to ensure sustainable liquid biofuels. Therefore, this paper evaluates a life cycle carbon footprint (or greenhouse (GHG) gas emissions) of liquid biofuels (biodiesel produced from jatropha oil and bioethanol produced from sugarcane molasses as alternative to fossil fuels in Tanzania. The functional unit (FU) of the study is defined as 1 Giga Joule (GJ) of output energy when a biofuel is combusted in the engine. The study found a positive GHG emissions related to biofuels. A carbon footprint (in CO2 equivalents) of jatropha biodiesel is 23.9kgFU−1 while that of molasses bioethanol is 17.4kgFU−1. Biodiesel combustion found to be a major contributor to carbon footprint by 41% which is attributed to methanol used during transesterification of jatropha oil followed by the use of chemical fertilizers (31%). Sugarcane production phase on the other hand found to be the highest contributor to carbon footprint of molasses bioethanol accounting for more than 80%. This is due to the use of diesel fuel, chemical fertilizers and burning of sugarcane prior to harvesting. Sensitivity analysis indicates that higher market prices of molasses increases carbon footprint of bioethanol same as higher market price of biodiesel. For the same energy output of 1GJ, molasses bioethanol observed to have lower carbon footprint than jatropha biodiesel by 27.2%. Both biofuels observed to save GHG emissions by >70% when used as fossil fuel replacement. The study recommends further research on socio-economic implication of large scale biofuel production; impact of land use change and land use competition and sustainability of biofuels to be carried out in near future.

Suggested Citation

  • Eshton, Bilha & Katima, Jamidu H.Y., 2015. "Carbon footprints of production and use of liquid biofuels in Tanzania," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 672-680.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:42:y:2015:i:c:p:672-680
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211400865X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nguyen, Thu Lan T. & Gheewala, Shabbir H. & Garivait, Savitri, 2008. "Full chain energy analysis of fuel ethanol from cane molasses in Thailand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(8), pages 722-734, August.
    2. Nguyen, Thu Lan T. & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2008. "Fuel ethanol from cane molasses in Thailand: Environmental and cost performance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1589-1599, May.
    3. Achten, Wouter M.J. & Almeida, Joana & Fobelets, Vincent & Bolle, Evelien & Mathijs, Erik & Singh, Virendra P. & Tewari, Dina N. & Verchot, Louis V. & Muys, Bart, 2010. "Life cycle assessment of Jatropha biodiesel as transportation fuel in rural India," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(12), pages 3652-3660, December.
    4. Pandey, Krishan K. & Pragya, Namita & Sahoo, P.K., 2011. "Life cycle assessment of small-scale high-input Jatropha biodiesel production in India," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4831-4839.
    5. Khatiwada, Dilip & Silveira, Semida, 2009. "Net energy balance of molasses based ethanol: The case of Nepal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2515-2524, December.
    6. Silalertruksa, Thapat & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2009. "Environmental sustainability assessment of bio-ethanol production in Thailand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 1933-1946.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anders Hansson & Mathias Fridahl & Simon Haikola & Pius Yanda & Noah Pauline & Edmund Mabhuye, 2020. "Preconditions for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) in sub-Saharan Africa: the case of Tanzania," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 6851-6875, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gasparatos, A. & von Maltitz, G.P. & Johnson, F.X. & Lee, L. & Mathai, M. & Puppim de Oliveira, J.A. & Willis, K.J., 2015. "Biofuels in sub-Sahara Africa: Drivers, impacts and priority policy areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 879-901.
    2. Somorin, Tosin Onabanjo & Di Lorenzo, Giuseppina & Kolios, Athanasios J., 2017. "Life-cycle assessment of self-generated electricity in Nigeria and Jatropha biodiesel as an alternative power fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 966-979.
    3. Khatiwada, Dilip & Venkata, Bharadwaj K. & Silveira, Semida & Johnson, Francis X., 2016. "Energy and GHG balances of ethanol production from cane molasses in Indonesia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 756-768.
    4. Danilo Arcentales-Bastidas & Carla Silva & Angel D. Ramirez, 2022. "The Environmental Profile of Ethanol Derived from Sugarcane in Ecuador: A Life Cycle Assessment Including the Effect of Cogeneration of Electricity in a Sugar Industrial Complex," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Portugal-Pereira, Joana & Nakatani, Jun & Kurisu, Kiyo H. & Hanaki, Keisuke, 2015. "Comparative energy and environmental analysis of Jatropha bioelectricity versus biodiesel production in remote areas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 284-293.
    6. Noel, Michael D. & Roach, Travis, 2017. "Marginal reductions in vehicle emissions under a dual-blend ethanol mandate: Evidence from a natural experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 45-54.
    7. Rendon-Sagardi, Miguel A. & Sanchez-Ramirez, Cuauhtemoc & Cortes-Robles, Guillermo & Alor-Hernandez, Giner & Cedillo-Campos, Miguel G., 2014. "Dynamic analysis of feasibility in ethanol supply chain for biofuel production in Mexico," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 358-367.
    8. Lian, Shuang & Li, Huijuan & Tang, Jinqiang & Tong, Dongmei & Hu, Changwei, 2012. "Integration of extraction and transesterification of lipid from jatropha seeds for the production of biodiesel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 540-547.
    9. Kumar, Ajeet & Vachan Tirkey, Jeevan & Kumar Shukla, Shailendra, 2021. "“Comparative energy and economic analysis of different vegetable oil plants for biodiesel production in India”," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 266-282.
    10. Lopes Silva, Diogo Aparecido & Delai, Ivete & Delgado Montes, Mary Laura & Roberto Ometto, Aldo, 2014. "Life cycle assessment of the sugarcane bagasse electricity generation in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 532-547.
    11. Hiloidhari, Moonmoon & Vijay, Vandit & Banerjee, Rangan & Baruah, D.C. & Rao, Anand B., 2021. "Energy-carbon-water footprint of sugarcane bioenergy: A district-level life cycle assessment in the state of Maharashtra, India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    12. Chauhan, Manish Kumar & Varun & Chaudhary, Sachin & Kumar, Suneel & Samar, 2011. "Life cycle assessment of sugar industry: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(7), pages 3445-3453, September.
    13. Chollacoop, Nuwong & Saisirirat, Peerawat & Sukkasi, Sittha & Tongroon, Manida & Fukuda, Tuenjai & Fukuda, Atsushi & Nivitchanyong, Siriluck, 2013. "Potential of greenhouse gas emission reduction in Thai road transport by ethanol bus technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 112-123.
    14. Yang, Q. & Chen, G.Q., 2012. "Nonrenewable energy cost of corn-ethanol in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 340-347.
    15. García, Carlos A. & Fuentes, Alfredo & Hennecke, Anna & Riegelhaupt, Enrique & Manzini, Fabio & Masera, Omar, 2011. "Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances of sugarcane ethanol production in Mexico," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2088-2097, June.
    16. Gabisa, Elias W. & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2020. "Can substitution of imported gasoline by locally produced molasses ethanol in Ethiopia be sustainable? An eco-efficiency assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    17. Portugal-Pereira, Joana & Nakatani, Jun & Kurisu, Kiyo & Hanaki, Keisuke, 2016. "Life cycle assessment of conventional and optimised Jatropha biodiesel fuels," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 585-593.
    18. Soam, Shveta & Kumar, Ravindra & Gupta, Ravi P. & Sharma, Pankaj K. & Tuli, Deepak K. & Das, Biswapriya, 2015. "Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol from sugarcane molasses in northern and western India and its impact on Indian biofuel programme," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 307-315.
    19. González-García, Sara & Gasol, Carles M. & Gabarrell, Xavier & Rieradevall, Joan & Moreira, Ma Teresa & Feijoo, Gumersindo, 2010. "Environmental profile of ethanol from poplar biomass as transport fuel in Southern Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 1014-1023.
    20. Kumar, S. & Shrestha, Pujan & Abdul Salam, P., 2013. "A review of biofuel policies in the major biofuel producing countries of ASEAN: Production, targets, policy drivers and impacts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 822-836.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:42:y:2015:i:c:p:672-680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.