IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v206y2024ics1364032124005744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An experimental evaluation of the interplay between geometry and scale on cross-flow turbine performance

Author

Listed:
  • Hunt, Aidan
  • Strom, Benjamin
  • Talpey, Gregory
  • Ross, Hannah
  • Scherl, Isabel
  • Brunton, Steven
  • Wosnik, Martin
  • Polagye, Brian

Abstract

Cross-flow turbines harness kinetic energy in wind or moving water. Due to their unsteady fluid dynamics, it can be difficult to predict the interplay between aspects of rotor geometry and turbine performance. This study considers the effects of three geometric parameters: the number of blades, the preset pitch angle, and the chord-to-radius ratio. The relevant fluid dynamics of cross-flow turbines are reviewed, as are prior experimental studies that have investigated these parameters in a more limited manner. Here, 223 unique experiments are conducted across an order of magnitude of diameter-based Reynolds numbers (≈8×104–8×105) in which the performance implications of these three geometric parameters are evaluated. In agreement with prior work, maximum performance is generally observed to increase with Reynolds number and decrease with blade count. The broader experimental space clarifies parametric interdependencies; for example, the optimal preset pitch angle is increasingly negative as the chord-to-radius ratio increases. As these experiments vary both the chord-to-radius ratio and blade count, the performance of different rotor geometries with the same solidity (the ratio of total blade chord to rotor circumference) can also be evaluated. Results demonstrate that while solidity can be a poor predictor of maximum performance, across all scales and tested geometries it is an excellent predictor of the tip-speed ratio corresponding to maximum performance. Overall, these results present a uniquely holistic view of relevant geometric considerations for cross-flow turbine rotor design and provide a rich dataset for validation of numerical simulations and reduced-order models.

Suggested Citation

  • Hunt, Aidan & Strom, Benjamin & Talpey, Gregory & Ross, Hannah & Scherl, Isabel & Brunton, Steven & Wosnik, Martin & Polagye, Brian, 2024. "An experimental evaluation of the interplay between geometry and scale on cross-flow turbine performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:206:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124005744
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124005744
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:206:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124005744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.