IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v190y2024ipbs1364032123009279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy yield decline of Sida hermaphrodita harvested for biogas production

Author

Listed:
  • Von Cossel, M.
  • Lewin, E.
  • Lewandowski, I.
  • Jablonowski, N.D.

Abstract

The perennial and herbaceous plant Sida hermaphrodita L. Rusby (Sida) has been investigated intensively with respect to its use as a solid biofuel for combustion and, to a lesser extent, for continuous biogas production. Since biogas production provides many opportunities for economic farm diversification, this study compared the biogas potential of Sida with common biogas crops silage maize (Zea mays L.) and cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.). To this end biomass samples were collected from a randomized field trial in Southwest Germany during the vegetative stage in five consecutive years starting in 2014. Biogas batchtests revealed constant specific-methane yields of 279 ± 8 LN kgVS−1 for Sida, significantly lower than for maize (335 ± 5 LN kgVS−1) and significantly higher than for cup plant (264.3 ± 3.7 LN kgVS−1). The annual Sida dry matter biomass yields declined significantly by 51% from 2015 (18.2 ± 2.6 Mg ha−1) to 2018 (9.2 ± 4.8 Mg ha−1) as a result of the summer harvest regime. This, in turn, led to a significant decline in Sida's total annual energy yields. Consequently, the average annual Sida energy yield (3549 ± 901 L heating oil equivalents (HOE) ha−1) was significantly lower than for maize (6611 ± 1186 L HOE ha−1) and cup plant (5261 ± 974 L HOE ha−1). These results clearly indicate that harvesting Sida during the vegetative stage for biogas production significantly decreases its energy yield over time. Therefore, Sida can be used economically and ecologically more sustainable for combustion using the dead plant biomass harvested in winter, while cup plant proved competitive to maize for biogas production.

Suggested Citation

  • Von Cossel, M. & Lewin, E. & Lewandowski, I. & Jablonowski, N.D., 2024. "Energy yield decline of Sida hermaphrodita harvested for biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PB).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:190:y:2024:i:pb:s1364032123009279
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.114069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123009279
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moritz von Cossel & Anja Mangold & Yasir Iqbal & Iris Lewandowski, 2019. "Methane Yield Potential of Miscanthus ( Miscanthus × giganteus (Greef et Deuter)) Established under Maize ( Zea mays L.)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. de Groot, Rudolf & Brander, Luke & van der Ploeg, Sander & Costanza, Robert & Bernard, Florence & Braat, Leon & Christie, Mike & Crossman, Neville & Ghermandi, Andrea & Hein, Lars & Hussain, Salman & , 2012. "Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 50-61.
    3. Adriaan J. Teuling, 2018. "A hot future for European droughts," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(5), pages 364-365, May.
    4. Ahmad Dar, Rouf & Ahmad Dar, Eajaz & Kaur, Ajit & Gupta Phutela, Urmila, 2018. "Sweet sorghum-a promising alternative feedstock for biofuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 4070-4090.
    5. Kurucz, Erika & Fári, Miklós G. & Antal, Gabriella & Gabnai, Zoltán & Popp, József & Bai, Attila, 2018. "Opportunities for the production and economics of Virginia fanpetals (Sida hermaphrodita)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 824-834.
    6. Von Cossel, M. & Lebendig, F. & Müller, M. & Hieber, C. & Iqbal, Y. & Cohnen, J. & Jablonowski, N.D., 2022. "Improving combustion quality of Miscanthus by adding biomass from perennial flower-rich wild plant species," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Šiaudinis, Gintaras & Jasinskas, Algirdas & Šarauskis, Egidijus & Steponavičius, Dainius & Karčauskienė, Danutė & Liaudanskienė, Inga, 2015. "The assessment of Virginia mallow (Sida hermaphrodita Rusby) and cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.) productivity, physico–mechanical properties and energy expenses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 606-612.
    8. Kwiatkowski, Jacek & Graban, Łukasz & Stolarski, Mariusz J., 2023. "The energy efficiency of Virginia fanpetals biomass production for solid biofuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Algirdas Jasinskas & Dionizas Streikus & Egidijus Šarauskis & Mečys Palšauskas & Kęstutis Venslauskas, 2020. "Energy Evaluation and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Reed Plant Pelletizing and Utilization as Solid Biofuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Tilvikiene, Vita & Kadziuliene, Zydre & Liaudanskiene, Inga & Zvicevicius, Egidijus & Cerniauskiene, Zivile & Cipliene, Ausra & Raila, Algirdas Jonas & Baltrusaitis, Jonas, 2020. "The quality and energy potential of introduced energy crops in northern part of temperate climate zone," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 887-895.
    3. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Peni, Dumitru & Dębowski, Marcin, 2022. "Biogas potential of cup plant and willow-leaf sunflower biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    4. Chaikaew, Pasicha & Hodges, Alan W. & Grunwald, Sabine, 2017. "Estimating the value of ecosystem services in a mixed-use watershed: A choice experiment approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 228-237.
    5. Qu, Yang & Hooper, Tara & Austen, Melanie C. & Papathanasopoulou, Eleni & Huang, Junling & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Development of a computable general equilibrium model based on integrated macroeconomic framework for ocean multi-use between offshore wind farms and fishing activities in Scotland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    6. Jinhua Wen & Yian Hua & Chenkai Cai & Shiwu Wang & Helong Wang & Xinyan Zhou & Jian Huang & Jianqun Wang, 2023. "Probabilistic Forecast and Risk Assessment of Flash Droughts Based on Numeric Weather Forecast: A Case Study in Zhejiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Hackbart, Vivian C.S. & de Lima, Guilherme T.N.P. & dos Santos, Rozely F., 2017. "Theory and practice of water ecosystem services valuation: Where are we going?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 218-227.
    8. Nibedita Mukherjee & Jean Huge & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Nico Koedam, 2014. "Ecosystem service valuations of mangrove ecosystems to inform decision making and future valuation exercises," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/217963, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Rodríguez-Ortega, T. & Olaizola, A.M. & Bernués, A., 2018. "A novel management-based system of payments for ecosystem services for targeted agri-environmental policy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PA), pages 74-84.
    10. repec:ags:uqseee:208090 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Bifani, Paolo & Agardy, Tundi & Vivas Eugui, David & Jaramillo, Lorena & Gómez- García, René & Vignati, Federico, . "Blue BioTrade: Harnessing Marine Trade to Support Ecological Sustainability and Economic Equity," Books, CAF Development Bank Of Latinamerica, number 1415.
    12. Śliz, Maciej & Wilk, Małgorzata, 2020. "A comprehensive investigation of hydrothermal carbonization: Energy potential of hydrochar derived from Virginia mallow," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 942-950.
    13. Ewa Zawojska & Zbigniew Szkop & Mikołaj Czajkowski & Tomasz Żylicz, 2016. "Economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by the Wilanów Park: A benefit transfer study," Working Papers 2016-31, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    14. Sangha, Kamaljit K & Evans, Jay & Edwards, Andrew & Russell-Smith, Jeremy & Fisher, Rohan & Yates, Cameron & Costanza, Robert, 2021. "Assessing the value of ecosystem services delivered by prescribed fire management in Australian tropical savannas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    15. Braat, Leon C. & de Groot, Rudolf, 2012. "The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 4-15.
    16. Alice Baronetti & Vincent Dubreuil & Antonello Provenzale & Simona Fratianni, 2022. "Future droughts in northern Italy: high-resolution projections using EURO-CORDEX and MED-CORDEX ensembles," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Frélichová, Jana & Vačkář, David & Pártl, Adam & Loučková, Blanka & Harmáčková, Zuzana V. & Lorencová, Eliška, 2014. "Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 110-117.
    18. Rao, Nalini S. & Ghermandi, Andrea & Portela, Rosimeiry & Wang, Xuanwen, 2015. "Global values of coastal ecosystem services: A spatial economic analysis of shoreline protection values," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 95-105.
    19. Palola, Pirta & Bailey, Richard & Wedding, Lisa, 2022. "A novel framework to operationalise value-pluralism in environmental valuation: Environmental value functions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    20. Dario Belluomini, 2016. "Environmental safeguard and Sustainable Development: An Insight into Payments for Ecosystema Services," CEsA Working Papers 140, CEsA - Centre for African and Development Studies.
    21. Rosalie Arendt & Till M. Bachmann & Masaharu Motoshita & Vanessa Bach & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2020. "Comparison of Different Monetization Methods in LCA: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-39, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:190:y:2024:i:pb:s1364032123009279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.