IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v149y2021ics136403212100383x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plasmonic Au-based junctions onto TiO2, gC3N4, and TiO2-gC3N4 systems for photocatalytic hydrogen production: Fundamentals and challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Jiménez-Calvo, Pablo
  • Caps, Valérie
  • Keller, Valérie

Abstract

Solar energy and photocatalysis will undoubtedly play a key aspect in the energy transition. In this background, hydrogen emerged as the ideal photocatalysis-driven solar fuel due to the simplicity of the water-splitting reaction. But finding a single catalyst with sufficient solar-to-photon conversion efficiency remains an important bottleneck of this technology. A constraint that prompted the advancement of multi-phase composites with broader capabilities. Owing to their unique properties, plasmonic Schottky junctions and Z-scheme heterojunctions arose as promising approaches to enhance hydrogen production. But the selection of suitable components towards multi-phasic composites remains challenging due to the absence of standardization in literature and proper characterization of existing materials. Characterization is especially important since components' plasmon wavelength (visible or NIR) and electronic properties have a significant influence on light-harvesting properties and charge carriers separation of the resulting composites. Plus, the optoelectronic properties of the semiconductors determine the resulting type of heterojunction with potential influence in the charge carrier separation via photosensitization. Recent studies suggest that the combination of TiO2 (broad band gap), gC3N4 (narrow band gap), and gold may achieve efficient plasmonic and Z-scheme heterojunctions. In this review, we cover the synthesis and implementation of these materials (alone or in combination), including key technical aspects in photocatalysis, plasmonics, and hydrogen production subjects. We also address pertinent knowledge, experimental gaps, and point to future perspectives to further improve the development of photocatalytic-driven hydrogen technologies. Globally, this multi-phasic composite Au/TiO2-gC3N4 could be used as a platform to continue reinforcing TiO2 efficiencies via photosensitization, co-catalysis, and surface plasmon resonance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiménez-Calvo, Pablo & Caps, Valérie & Keller, Valérie, 2021. "Plasmonic Au-based junctions onto TiO2, gC3N4, and TiO2-gC3N4 systems for photocatalytic hydrogen production: Fundamentals and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:149:y:2021:i:c:s136403212100383x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212100383X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William L. Barnes & Alain Dereux & Thomas W. Ebbesen, 2003. "Surface plasmon subwavelength optics," Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6950), pages 824-830, August.
    2. Rong Wang & Kazuhito Hashimoto & Akira Fujishima & Makota Chikuni & Eiichi Kojima & Atsushi Kitamura & Mitsuhide Shimohigoshi & Toshiya Watanabe, 1997. "Light-induced amphiphilic surfaces," Nature, Nature, vol. 388(6641), pages 431-432, July.
    3. Nikolaidis, Pavlos & Poullikkas, Andreas, 2017. "A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 597-611.
    4. Parthasarathy, Prakash & Narayanan, K. Sheeba, 2014. "Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: Influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield – A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 570-579.
    5. Xu, Shuo & Zhao, Xi & Liu, Jing, 2018. "Liquid metal activated aluminum-water reaction for direct hydrogen generation at room temperature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 17-37.
    6. Wang, H.Z. & Leung, D.Y.C. & Leung, M.K.H. & Ni, M., 2009. "A review on hydrogen production using aluminum and aluminum alloys," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 845-853, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alviani, Vani Novita & Hirano, Nobuo & Watanabe, Noriaki & Oba, Masahiro & Uno, Masaoki & Tsuchiya, Noriyoshi, 2021. "Local initiative hydrogen production by utilization of aluminum waste materials and natural acidic hot-spring water," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    2. Tian, Hailin & Li, Jie & Yan, Miao & Tong, Yen Wah & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Wang, Xiaonan, 2019. "Organic waste to biohydrogen: A critical review from technological development and environmental impact analysis perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Khademi, Mohammad Hasan & Alipour-Dehkordi, Afshar & Nalchifard, Fereshteh, 2023. "Sustainable hydrogen and syngas production from waste valorization of biodiesel synthesis by-product: Green chemistry approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Ramprakash, Balasubramani & Lindblad, Peter & Eaton-Rye, Julian J. & Incharoensakdi, Aran, 2022. "Current strategies and future perspectives in biological hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Zainal, Bidattul Syirat & Ker, Pin Jern & Mohamed, Hassan & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Fattah, I.M.R. & Rahman, S.M. Ashrafur & Nghiem, Long D. & Mahlia, T M Indra, 2024. "Recent advancement and assessment of green hydrogen production technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    6. Sedlar, D. Karasalihović & Vulin, D. & Krajačić, G. & Jukić, L., 2019. "Offshore gas production infrastructure reutilisation for blue energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 159-174.
    7. Parvez, Ashak Mahmud & Hafner, Selina & Hornberger, Matthias & Schmid, Max & Scheffknecht, Günter, 2021. "Sorption enhanced gasification (SEG) of biomass for tailored syngas production with in-situ CO2 capture: Current status, process scale-up experiences and outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. Hoang, Anh Tuan & Pandey, Ashok & Martinez De Osés, Francisco Javier & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Said, Zafar & Ng, Kim Hoong & Ağbulut, Ümit & Tarełko, Wiesław & Ölçer, Aykut I. & Nguyen, Xuan Phuong, 2023. "Technological solutions for boosting hydrogen role in decarbonization strategies and net-zero goals of world shipping: Challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Lui, Jade & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Tsang, Daniel C.W. & You, Siming, 2020. "A critical review on the principles, applications, and challenges of waste-to-hydrogen technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    10. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    11. Chen, Yen-Hsiang & Shih, Fu-Yuan & Lee, Ming-Tsang & Lee, Yung-Chun & Chen, Yu-Bin, 2020. "Development of lightweight energy-saving glass and its near-field electromagnetic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    12. Sadeghi, Shayan & Ghandehariun, Samane, 2022. "A standalone solar thermochemical water splitting hydrogen plant with high-temperature molten salt: Thermodynamic and economic analyses and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    13. José Juan Alvarado Flores & Jorge Víctor Alcaraz Vera & María Liliana Ávalos Rodríguez & Luis Bernardo López Sosa & José Guadalupe Rutiaga Quiñones & Luís Fernando Pintor Ibarra & Francisco Márquez Mo, 2022. "Analysis of Pyrolysis Kinetic Parameters Based on Various Mathematical Models for More than Twenty Different Biomasses: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    15. Khan, Mohd Atiqueuzzaman & Ngo, Huu Hao & Guo, Wenshan & Liu, Yiwen & Zhang, Xinbo & Guo, Jianbo & Chang, Soon Woong & Nguyen, Dinh Duc & Wang, Jie, 2018. "Biohydrogen production from anaerobic digestion and its potential as renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 754-768.
    16. Alves, Luís & Pereira, Vítor & Lagarteira, Tiago & Mendes, Adélio, 2021. "Catalytic methane decomposition to boost the energy transition: Scientific and technological advancements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    17. Abadie, Luis Mª & Chamorro, José M., 2023. "Investment in wind-based hydrogen production under economic and physical uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    18. Samuel Simon Araya & Fan Zhou & Simon Lennart Sahlin & Sobi Thomas & Christian Jeppesen & Søren Knudsen Kær, 2019. "Fault Characterization of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Trowell, K.A. & Goroshin, S. & Frost, D.L. & Bergthorson, J.M., 2020. "Aluminum and its role as a recyclable, sustainable carrier of renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    20. Navas-Anguita, Zaira & García-Gusano, Diego & Iribarren, Diego, 2019. "A review of techno-economic data for road transportation fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 11-26.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:149:y:2021:i:c:s136403212100383x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.