IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v147y2021ics1364032121005025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability assessment of sugarcane residues valorization to biobutadiene by exergy and exergoeconomic evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Fallahi, Alireza
  • Farzad, Somayeh
  • Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid
  • Mandegari, Mohsen
  • Görgens, Johann F.
  • Gupta, Vijai Kumar
  • Lam, Su Shiung
  • Tabatabaei, Meisam
  • Aghbashlo, Mortaza

Abstract

Butadiene is one of the essential platform chemicals for producing a broad spectrum of synthetic rubbers, polymers, copolymers, and latexes. Among the various routes developed to make bio-based butadiene, dehydrogenation/dehydration of bioethanol has exhibited great promise regarding economic viability and ecological soundness. In this study, a process producing bioethanol from sugarcane residues and then converting the synthesized bioethanol to biobutadiene was simulated and analyzed. The process included biomass pretreatment, enzyme production, saccharification/fermentation, bioethanol separation/distillation, ethanol dehydrogenation, acetaldehyde liquefaction/compression, biobutadiene synthesis, biobutadiene liquefaction/compression, and biobutadiene recovery/purification subsystems. Exergy analysis was first used to identify the causes and sources of thermodynamic losses of the process. In continuation, exergoeconomic analysis was performed based on the obtained exergetic results to reveal the hotspots of the cost losses of the process. The highest exergy destruction rate was recorded for the bioethanol separation/distillation subsystem, amounting to 34.9%‏ ‏of the total exergy destruction rate of the process.‏ The exergy efficiency of the process was 17.5% by considering only biobutadiene as the main product of the process, while this value was increased to 87.5% by considering all useful or potentially useful outputs. The saccharification/fermentation subsystem showed the highest total hourly exergoeconomic cost (504 USD/h), corresponding to 23.1% of the total hourly exergoeconomic cost of the process. The unit costs of exergy for the biobutadiene (main product) and stillage (main by-product) streams were 6.2 and 4.2 USD/GJ, respectively. Overall, efforts to improve the process exergoeconomically should be mainly directed towards reducing the investment cost of the biomass pretreatment subsystem while diminishing the exergy destruction cost of the saccharification/fermentation subsystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Fallahi, Alireza & Farzad, Somayeh & Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid & Mandegari, Mohsen & Görgens, Johann F. & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Lam, Su Shiung & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza, 2021. "Sustainability assessment of sugarcane residues valorization to biobutadiene by exergy and exergoeconomic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:147:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121005025
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121005025
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    2. Amelio, A. & Van de Voorde, T. & Creemers, C. & Degrève, J. & Darvishmanesh, S. & Luis, P. & Van der Bruggen, B., 2016. "Comparison between exergy and energy analysis for biodiesel production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 135-145.
    3. van der Heijden, Harro & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J., 2012. "Exergy analysis of thermochemical ethanol production via biomass gasification and catalytic synthesis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 200-210.
    4. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Rafiee, Shahin & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Lindeneg, Susanne & Angelidaki, Irini, 2020. "Environmental life cycle assessment of different biorefinery platforms valorizing municipal solid waste to bioenergy, microbial protein, lactic and succinic acid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Soltanian, Salman & Ghanavati, Hossein, 2019. "Biopower and biofertilizer production from organic municipal solid waste: An exergoenvironmental analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 64-76.
    6. Soltanian, Salman & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Farzad, Somayeh & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Mandegari, Mohsen & Görgens, Johann F., 2019. "Exergoeconomic analysis of lactic acid and power cogeneration from sugarcane residues through a biorefinery approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 872-889.
    7. Torres, Erick & Rodriguez-Ortiz, Leandro A. & Zalazar, Daniela & Echegaray, Marcelo & Rodriguez, Rosa & Zhang, Huili & Mazza, Germán, 2020. "4-E (environmental, economic, energetic and exergetic) analysis of slow pyrolysis of lignocellulosic waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 296-307.
    8. Liu, Fang & Chen, Guanyi & Yan, Beibei & Ma, Wenchao & Cheng, Zhanjun & Hou, Li'an, 2017. "Exergy analysis of a new lignocellulosic biomass-based polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1087-1095.
    9. Song, Guohui & Xiao, Jun & Zhao, Hao & Shen, Laihong, 2012. "A unified correlation for estimating specific chemical exergy of solid and liquid fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 164-173.
    10. Tsang, Eric W. K., 2014. "Old and New," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(03), pages 390-390, November.
    11. Soltani, Saeed, 2019. "Modified exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a biomass post fired hydrogen production combined cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1466-1480.
    12. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Mandegari, Mohsen & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Farzad, Somayeh & Mojarab Soufiyan, Mohamad & Görgens, Johann F., 2018. "Exergy analysis of a lignocellulosic-based biorefinery annexed to a sugarcane mill for simultaneous lactic acid and electricity production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 623-638.
    13. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Khalife, Esmail & Roodbar Shojaei, Taha & Dadak, Ali, 2018. "Exergoeconomic analysis of a DI diesel engine fueled with diesel/biodiesel (B5) emulsions containing aqueous nano cerium oxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 967-978.
    14. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Hosseinpour, Soleiman & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Rastegari, Hajar & Ghaziaskar, Hassan S., 2019. "Multi-objective exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental optimization of continuous synthesis of solketal through glycerol ketalization with acetone in the presence of ethanol as co-solvent," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 735-748.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Lim, Yee Kai & Tan, Inn Shi & Foo, Henry Chee Yew & Tan, Yie Hua & Lam, Man Kee & Wong, Mee Kee, 2024. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses of Eucheuma cottoni residue biorefinery for co-production of polylactic acid and electricity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    3. Li, Yuping & Tan, Fenghua & Peng, Jiangang & Feng, Mi & Liao, Yuhe & Luo, Weimin & Dong, Kaijun & Long, Jinxing, 2023. "Exergy analysis of alternative configurations of biomass gasification-mixed alcohol production system via catalytic synthesis and fermentation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    4. Chen, Lintao & Xiao, Kai & Hu, Fan & Li, Yajun, 2022. "Performance evaluation and optimization design of integrated energy system based on thermodynamic, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Khounani, Zahra & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Amiri, Hamid & Lam, Su Shiung & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2021. "Exergoenvironmental analysis of bioenergy systems: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Yek, Peter Nai Yuh & Cheng, Yoke Wang & Liew, Rock Keey & Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Peng, Wanxi & Park, Young-Kwon & Sonne, Christian & Kong, Sieng Huat & Tabatabaei, 2021. "Progress in the torrefaction technology for upgrading oil palm wastes to energy-dense biochar: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Gurunathan Manikandan & P. Rajesh Kanna & Dawid Taler & Tomasz Sobota, 2023. "Review of Waste Cooking Oil (WCO) as a Feedstock for Biofuel—Indian Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Zailan, Roziah & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Jamaluddin, Khairulnadzmi, 2021. "Malaysia scenario of biomass supply chain-cogeneration system and optimization modeling development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    6. Liu, Yang & Lyu, Yizheng & Tian, Jinping & Zhao, Jialing & Ye, Ning & Zhang, Yongming & Chen, Lujun, 2021. "Review of waste biorefinery development towards a circular economy: From the perspective of a life cycle assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Valijanian, Elena & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ghanavati, Hossein & Sulaiman, Alawi & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosr, 2020. "A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 2: Mainstream and downstream strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1392-1407.
    8. Chung, Millicent Rosette Wan Yi & Tan, Inn Shi & Foo, Henry Chee Yew & Lam, Man Kee, 2022. "Exergy analysis of a biorefinery process for co-production of third-generation L-lactic acid and electricity from Eucheuma denticulatum residues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    9. Lim, Yee Kai & Tan, Inn Shi & Foo, Henry Chee Yew & Tan, Yie Hua & Lam, Man Kee & Wong, Mee Kee, 2024. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses of Eucheuma cottoni residue biorefinery for co-production of polylactic acid and electricity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    10. Soltanian, Salman & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Farzad, Somayeh & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Mandegari, Mohsen & Görgens, Johann F., 2019. "Exergoeconomic analysis of lactic acid and power cogeneration from sugarcane residues through a biorefinery approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 872-889.
    11. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2016. "On the efficiency, exergy costs and CO2 emission cost allocation for an integrated syngas and ammonia production plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P2), pages 341-360.
    12. Fan, Guangli & Ahmadi, A. & Ehyaei, M.A. & Das, Biplab, 2021. "Energy, exergy, economic and exergoenvironmental analyses of polygeneration system integrated gas cycle, absorption chiller, and Copper-Chlorine thermochemical cycle to produce power, cooling, and hyd," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    13. Karagoz, Mustafa & Uysal, Cuneyt & Agbulut, Umit & Saridemir, Suat, 2021. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses of a CI engine fueled with diesel-biodiesel blends containing various metal-oxide nanoparticles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    14. Martínez González, Aldemar & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Escobar Palacio, José Carlos, 2019. "Syngas production from oil sludge gasification and its potential use in power generation systems: An energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1175-1190.
    15. Rocha, Danilo H.D. & Siqueira, Diana S. & Silva, Rogério J., 2021. "Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluating coal-fired power plants technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    16. Cavalcanti, Eduardo J.C. & Carvalho, Monica & B. Azevedo, Jonathan L., 2019. "Exergoenvironmental results of a eucalyptus biomass-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. Seyam, Shaimaa & Dincer, Ibrahim & Agelin-Chaab, Martin, 2023. "A comprehensive assessment of a new hybrid combined marine engine using alternative fuel blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    18. Martínez González, Aldemar & Lesme Jaén, René & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo, 2020. "Thermodynamic assessment of the integrated gasification-power plant operating in the sawmill industry: An energy and exergy analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1151-1163.
    19. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Hosseinpour, Soleiman & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Rastegari, Hajar & Ghaziaskar, Hassan S., 2019. "Multi-objective exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental optimization of continuous synthesis of solketal through glycerol ketalization with acetone in the presence of ethanol as co-solvent," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 735-748.
    20. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Valijanian, Elena & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ghanavati, Hossein & Sulaiman, Alawi & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosr, 2020. "A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 1: Upstream strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1204-1220.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:147:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121005025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.