IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v145y2021ics1364032121003841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dual-stage pulse-feed operation enhanced methanation of lipidic waste during co-digestion using acclimatized consortia

Author

Listed:
  • Kang, Dongho
  • Saha, Shouvik
  • Kurade, Mayur B.
  • Basak, Bikram
  • Ha, Geon-Soo
  • Jeon, Byong-Hun
  • Lee, Sean S.
  • Kim, Jung Rae

Abstract

Methanation was improved during the dual-stage pulse-feed anaerobic co-digestion of extracted lipid (EL) from food waste leachate using acclimatized consortia by gradually increasing the organic loading rates (OLRs) in the subsequent phases. The utilization of major saturated and unsaturated long chain fatty acids (LCFAs) reached 78% and 98% in the acidogenic fermenters with consecutive organic loading, respectively. The acclimatized consortium induced the LCFA degradation and interconversion of short-medium chain fatty acids (SCFA–MCFAs) in the fermenters, even under highest OLR values. The highest methane yield (0.46 g g−1 VSinitial) was achieved in the third phase (61% EL loading of total injected volatile solid) with the complete utilization of LCFAs and SCFA–MCFAs in the digester. The assessment of the microbial community revealed that acidogenic Intestinimonas and Megasphaera, and acetogenic Levilinea were predominant in the fermenters due to their preeminent activities. The predominance of acetogenic Syntrophomonas (26%) indicated that it played a major role in β-oxidation, and its syntrophy with mixotrophic methanogens, such as Methanosarcina (93%), facilitated methanation through the complete degradation of EL in the digesters. The use of pulse-feed operation in dual-stage anaerobic co-digestion improved the methanation through complete utilization of EL under varied OLRs mediated by the acclimatized consortia.

Suggested Citation

  • Kang, Dongho & Saha, Shouvik & Kurade, Mayur B. & Basak, Bikram & Ha, Geon-Soo & Jeon, Byong-Hun & Lee, Sean S. & Kim, Jung Rae, 2021. "Dual-stage pulse-feed operation enhanced methanation of lipidic waste during co-digestion using acclimatized consortia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:145:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121003841
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121003841
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shakourifar, Niloofar & Krisa, David & Eskicioglu, Cigdem, 2020. "Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal waste sludge with grease trap waste mixture: Point of process failure determination," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 117-127.
    2. Zamri, M.F.M.A. & Hasmady, Saiful & Akhiar, Afifi & Ideris, Fazril & Shamsuddin, A.H. & Mofijur, M. & Fattah, I. M. Rizwanul & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2021. "A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Li, C. & Champagne, P. & Anderson, B.C., 2015. "Enhanced biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of municipal wastewater treatment sludge and fat, oil and grease (FOG) by a modified two-stage thermophilic digester system with selected thermo-," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 474-482.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Onwuemezie, Linus & Gohari Darabkhani, Hamidreza, 2024. "Biohydrogen production from solar and wind assisted AF-MEC coupled with MFC, PEM electrolysis of H2O and H2 fuel cell for small-scale applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Eljamal, Ramadan & Maamoun, Ibrahim & Bensaida, Khaoula & Yilmaz, Gulsum & Sugihara, Yuij & Eljamal, Osama, 2022. "A novel method to improve methane generation from waste sludge using iron nanoparticles coated with magnesium hydroxide," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diamantis, Vasileios & Eftaxias, Alexandros & Stamatelatou, Katerina & Noutsopoulos, Constantinos & Vlachokostas, Christos & Aivasidis, Alexandros, 2021. "Bioenergy in the era of circular economy: Anaerobic digestion technological solutions to produce biogas from lipid-rich wastes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 438-447.
    2. Francesco Calise & Francesco Liberato Cappiello & Luca Cimmino & Massimo Dentice d’Accadia & Maria Vicidomini, 2021. "A Review of the State of the Art of Biomethane Production: Recent Advancements and Integration of Renewable Energies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-43, August.
    3. Carolinne Secco & Maria Eduarda Kounaris Fuziki & Angelo Marcelo Tusset & Giane Gonçalves Lenzi, 2023. "Reactive Processes for H 2 S Removal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Stephen Tangwe & Patrick Mukumba & Golden Makaka, 2022. "Comparison of the Prediction Accuracy of Total Viable Bacteria Counts in a Batch Balloon Digester Charged with Cow Manure: Multiple Linear Regression and Non-Linear Regression Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
    5. El Ibrahimi, Mohammed & Khay, Ismail & El Maakoul, Anas & Bakhouya, Mohamed, 2022. "Effects of the temperature range on the energy performance of mixed and unmixed digesters with submerged waste: An experimental and CFD simulation study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1092-1104.
    6. James Darmey & Julius Cudjoe Ahiekpor & Satyanarayana Narra & Osei-Wusu Achaw & Herbert Fiifi Ansah, 2023. "Municipal Solid Waste Generation Trend and Bioenergy Recovery Potential: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Owusu-Agyeman, I. & Bedaso, B. & Laumeyer, C. & Pan, C. & Malovanyy, A. & Baresel, C. & Plaza, E. & Cetecioglu, Z., 2023. "Volatile fatty acids production from municipal waste streams and use as a carbon source for denitrification: The journey towards full-scale application and revealing key microbial players," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Prajapati, Kishan Kumar & Yadav, Monika & Singh, Rao Martand & Parikh, Priti & Pareek, Nidhi & Vivekanand, Vivekanand, 2021. "An overview of municipal solid waste management in Jaipur city, India - Current status, challenges and recommendations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    9. Zainal, Bidattul Syirat & Ker, Pin Jern & Mohamed, Hassan & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Fattah, I.M.R. & Rahman, S.M. Ashrafur & Nghiem, Long D. & Mahlia, T M Indra, 2024. "Recent advancement and assessment of green hydrogen production technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    10. Liu, Hongbo & Wang, Xingkang & Fang, Yueying & Lai, Wenjia & Xu, Suyun & Lichtfouse, Eric, 2022. "Enhancing thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste with biogas residue biochar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 465-475.
    11. Grosser, A. & Neczaj, E. & Jasinska, Anna & Celary, P., 2020. "The influence of grease trap sludge sterilization on the performance of anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 988-997.
    12. He, Xiaoman & Deng, Chen & Li, Pengfei & Yu, Wenbing & Chen, Huichao & Lin, Richen & Shen, Dekui & Baroutian, Saeid, 2024. "The impact of salinity on biomethane production and microbial community in the anaerobic digestion of food waste components," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    13. Marcin Zieliński & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Dębowski, 2022. "Advantages and Limitations of Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment—Technological Basics, Development Directions, and Technological Innovations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-39, December.
    14. Shane, Agabu & Gheewala, Shabbir H. & Kafwembe, Young, 2017. "Urban commercial biogas power plant model for Zambian towns," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-14.
    15. Duarte Souza Alvarenga Santos, Nathália & Rückert Roso, Vinícius & Teixeira Malaquias, Augusto César & Coelho Baêta, José Guilherme, 2021. "Internal combustion engines and biofuels: Examining why this robust combination should not be ignored for future sustainable transportation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    16. Kim, Seunghwan & Lee, Changmin & Young Kim, Jae, 2023. "Effects of alkaline thermal hydrolysis on the formation of refractory compounds and energy balance of anaerobic digestion of cattle manure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    17. Yong Hu & Haiyuan Ma & Jiang Wu & Takuro Kobayashi & Kai-Qin Xu, 2022. "Performance Comparison of CSTR and CSFBR in Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste with Grease Trap Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-11, November.
    18. Mancini, G. & Lombardi, L. & Luciano, A. & Bolzonella, D. & Viotti, P. & Fino, D., 2024. "A reduction in global impacts through a waste-wastewater-energy nexus: A life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    19. Elalami, D. & Carrere, H. & Monlau, F. & Abdelouahdi, K. & Oukarroum, A. & Barakat, A., 2019. "Pretreatment and co-digestion of wastewater sludge for biogas production: Recent research advances and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Santo Fabio Corsino & Michele Torregrossa & Gaspare Viviani, 2021. "Biomethane Production from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Selected Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW) with Sewage Sludge: Effect of the Inoculum to Substrate Ratio (ISR) and Mixture Composit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:145:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121003841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.