IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v134y2020ics1364032120306110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of climate-change scenarios on offshore wind turbine structural performance

Author

Listed:
  • Wilkie, David
  • Galasso, Carmine

Abstract

Offshore wind turbines (OWTs) must be sufficiently safe and resilient to withstand windstorms over an operational life of 20–25 years in an aggressive marine environment. Current performance-based assessment methods for OWTs often neglect structural failure and focus on equipment failure only, which can be assessed using existing empirical databases. This study uses a simulation-based approach to assess various performance metrics associated with offshore wind infrastructure exposed to operational wind and wave conditions. Surrogate modelling is used to predict structural failure due to fatigue in a computationally efficient manner. The proposed surrogate model is based on Gaussian process regression and allows one to run structural simulations at a small training sample of wind and wave conditions and emulates the response at combinations where the OWT was not explicitly assessed. This results in an integrated probabilistic performance-based assessment framework for OWTs that considers both structural and non-structural (equipment) components. In particular, the proposed framework is used to evaluate the potential impact of climate-change scenarios on various OWT performance metrics, namely, fatigue damage, fatigue reliability and, ultimately, financial losses (cost of direct damage) for a case study OWT. This is compared to the change in revenue resulting from power production to understand which is more sensitive to climate change. Both fatigue damage and structural safety are found to be sensitive to changes in the site environmental conditions. However, as financial losses additionally depend on non-structural components - which are typically characterised by much higher failure rates - they are found to be less sensitive to the considered climate-change scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilkie, David & Galasso, Carmine, 2020. "Impact of climate-change scenarios on offshore wind turbine structural performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:134:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120306110
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120306110
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murcia, Juan Pablo & Réthoré, Pierre-Elouan & Dimitrov, Nikolay & Natarajan, Anand & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard & Graf, Peter & Kim, Taeseong, 2018. "Uncertainty propagation through an aeroelastic wind turbine model using polynomial surrogates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 910-922.
    2. Barstad, Idar & Sorteberg, Asgeir & Mesquita, Michel dos-Santos, 2012. "Present and future offshore wind power potential in northern Europe based on downscaled global climate runs with adjusted SST and sea ice cover," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 398-405.
    3. Mark A. Hemer & Yalin Fan & Nobuhito Mori & Alvaro Semedo & Xiaolan L. Wang, 2013. "Projected changes in wave climate from a multi-model ensemble," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(5), pages 471-476, May.
    4. Rubert, T. & McMillan, D. & Niewczas, P., 2018. "A decision support tool to assist with lifetime extension of wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 423-433.
    5. Wilkie, David & Galasso, Carmine, 2020. "A probabilistic framework for offshore wind turbine loss assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1772-1783.
    6. Soares, Pedro M.M. & Lima, Daniela C.A. & Cardoso, Rita M. & Nascimento, Manuel L. & Semedo, Alvaro, 2017. "Western Iberian offshore wind resources: More or less in a global warming climate?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 72-90.
    7. Fabian Vorpahl & Holger Schwarze & Tim Fischer & Marc Seidel & Jason Jonkman, 2013. "Offshore wind turbine environment, loads, simulation, and design," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(5), pages 548-570, September.
    8. Carvalho, D. & Rocha, A. & Gómez-Gesteira, M. & Silva Santos, C., 2017. "Potential impacts of climate change on European wind energy resource under the CMIP5 future climate projections," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 29-40.
    9. Dicorato, M. & Forte, G. & Pisani, M. & Trovato, M., 2011. "Guidelines for assessment of investment cost for offshore wind generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2043-2051.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ju, Shen-Haw, 2022. "Increasing the fatigue life of offshore wind turbine jacket structures using yaw stiffness and damping," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Paxis Marques João Roque & Shyama Pada Chowdhury & Zhongjie Huan, 2021. "Performance Enhancement of Proposed Namaacha Wind Farm by Minimising Losses Due to the Wake Effect: A Mozambican Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrés Ruiz & Florin Onea & Eugen Rusu, 2020. "Study Concerning the Expected Dynamics of the Wind Energy Resources in the Iberian Nearshore," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Zhang, Shuangyi & Li, Xichen, 2021. "Future projections of offshore wind energy resources in China using CMIP6 simulations and a deep learning-based downscaling method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. deCastro, M. & Rusu, L. & Arguilé-Pérez, B. & Ribeiro, A. & Costoya, X. & Carvalho, D. & Gómez-Gesteira, M., 2024. "Different approaches to analyze the impact of future climate change on the exploitation of wave energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    4. Fortes, Patrícia & Simoes, Sofia G. & Amorim, Filipa & Siggini, Gildas & Sessa, Valentina & Saint-Drenan, Yves-Marie & Carvalho, Sílvia & Mujtaba, Babar & Diogo, Paulo & Assoumou, Edi, 2022. "How sensitive is a carbon-neutral power sector to climate change? The interplay between hydro, solar and wind for Portugal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    5. Jannie Sønderkær Nielsen & Lindsay Miller-Branovacki & Rupp Carriveau, 2021. "Probabilistic and Risk-Informed Life Extension Assessment of Wind Turbine Structural Components," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Vu Dinh, Quang & Doan, Quang-Van & Ngo-Duc, Thanh & Nguyen Dinh, Van & Dinh Duc, Nguyen, 2022. "Offshore wind resource in the context of global climate change over a tropical area," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    7. Santos, F. & Gómez-Gesteira, M. & deCastro, M. & Añel, J.A. & Carvalho, D. & Costoya, Xurxo & Dias, J.M., 2018. "On the accuracy of CORDEX RCMs to project future winds over the Iberian Peninsula and surrounding ocean," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 289-300.
    8. Santiago Salvador & Xurxo Costoya & Francisco Javier Sanz-Larruga & Luis Gimeno, 2018. "Development of Offshore Wind Power: Contrasting Optimal Wind Sites with Legal Restrictions in Galicia, Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Wilkie, David & Galasso, Carmine, 2020. "A probabilistic framework for offshore wind turbine loss assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1772-1783.
    10. Gao, Yang & Ma, Shaoxiu & Wang, Tao, 2019. "The impact of climate change on wind power abundance and variability in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Figueiredo, Raquel & Nunes, Pedro & Brito, Miguel C., 2021. "The resilience of a decarbonized power system to climate variability: Portuguese case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    12. He, J.Y. & Chan, P.W. & Li, Q.S. & Tong, H.W., 2023. "Mapping future offshore wind resources in the South China Sea under climate change by regional climate modeling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Carvalho, D. & Rocha, A. & Costoya, X. & deCastro, M. & Gómez-Gesteira, M., 2021. "Wind energy resource over Europe under CMIP6 future climate projections: What changes from CMIP5 to CMIP6," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. Laura Castro-Santos & Maite deCastro & Xurxo Costoya & Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso & Isabel Lamas-Galdo & Americo Ribeiro & João M. Dias & Moncho Gómez-Gesteira, 2021. "Economic Feasibility of Floating Offshore Wind Farms Considering Near Future Wind Resources: Case Study of Iberian Coast and Bay of Biscay," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Jung, Christopher & Schindler, Dirk, 2022. "A review of recent studies on wind resource projections under climate change," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    16. Velarde, Joey & Kramhøft, Claus & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2019. "Global sensitivity analysis of offshore wind turbine foundation fatigue loads," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 177-189.
    17. Nikkhah, Saman & Rabiee, Abbas, 2018. "Optimal wind power generation investment, considering voltage stability of power systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 308-325.
    18. Christoph Wolter & Henrik Klinge Jacobsen & Lorenzo Zeni & Georgios Rogdakis & Nicolaos A. Cutululis, 2020. "Overplanting in offshore wind power plants in different regulatory regimes," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), May.
    19. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Wind Energy Potential at Three Locations in South Korea Using Long-Term Measured Wind Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    20. Aleksei Valentinovich Bogoviz & Svetlana Vladislavlevna Lobova & Yulia Vyacheslavovna Ragulina & Alexander Nikolaevich Alekseev, 2018. "Russia s Energy Security Doctrine: Addressing Emerging Challenges and Opportunities," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(5), pages 1-6.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:134:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120306110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.