IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v133y2020ics1364032120304573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multicriteria analysis of seawater electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production at sea

Author

Listed:
  • d’Amore-Domenech, Rafael
  • Santiago, Óscar
  • Leo, Teresa J.

Abstract

The production of green hydrogen through the electrolysis of seawater using marine renewable energies offer numerous advantages. Nonetheless, the combination of marine renewables and electrolysis technologies has not reached commercial status yet. This study aims to see which electrolysis technology presents the best prospects of applicability in the short term by conducting a multicriteria comparison, where economic, environmental and social factors have been selected. Due to the different nature of the involved factors, the analysis is inherently complex. For its simplification, multicriteria decision-making methods are used. However, such methods could lead to various types of inconsistencies, and in order to avoid them, five distinct multicriteria decision-making methods have been employed. This combination enables checking the ranking consistency and its robustness, conferring the results a higher reliability. The results of the study reveal that Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis at sea presents the best prospects of applicability in the short term.

Suggested Citation

  • d’Amore-Domenech, Rafael & Santiago, Óscar & Leo, Teresa J., 2020. "Multicriteria analysis of seawater electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production at sea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:133:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120304573
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120304573
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baudry, Gino & Macharis, Cathy & Vallée, Thomas, 2018. "Range-based Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis: A combined method of Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis and Monte Carlo simulation to support participatory decision making under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 257-269.
    2. McPherson, Madeleine & Johnson, Nils & Strubegger, Manfred, 2018. "The role of electricity storage and hydrogen technologies in enabling global low-carbon energy transitions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 649-661.
    3. Astariz, S. & Iglesias, G., 2015. "The economics of wave energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 397-408.
    4. Buttler, Alexander & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2018. "Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2440-2454.
    5. Zhigong Peng & Baozhong Zhang & Xueliang Cai & Lei Wang, 2016. "Effects of Water Management Strategies on Water Balance in a Water Scarce Region: A Case Study in Beijing by a Holistic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Durbach, Ian N. & Stewart, Theodor J., 2012. "Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 1-14.
    7. Moreno-Jiménez, Jose María & Vargas, Luis G., 2018. "Cognitive Multiple Criteria Decision Making and the Legacy of the Analytic Hierarchy Process/Decisión Multicriterio Cognitiva y el Legado del Proceso Analítico Jerárquico," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 36, pages 67-80, Enero.
    8. Mulliner, Emma & Malys, Naglis & Maliene, Vida, 2016. "Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 146-156.
    9. AlZahrani, Abdullah A. & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2018. "Modeling and performance optimization of a solid oxide electrolysis system for hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 471-485.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. He, Hongjing & Huang, Yongyi & Nakadomari, Akito & Masrur, Hasan & Krishnan, Narayanan & Hemeida, Ashraf M. & Mikhaylov, Alexey & Senjyu, Tomonobu, 2023. "Potential and economic viability of green hydrogen production from seawater electrolysis using renewable energy in remote Japanese islands," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1436-1447.
    2. Svetlana Revinova & Inna Lazanyuk & Svetlana Ratner & Konstantin Gomonov, 2023. "Forecasting Development of Green Hydrogen Production Technologies Using Component-Based Learning Curves," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Dingenen, Fons & Verbruggen, Sammy W., 2021. "Tapping hydrogen fuel from the ocean: A review on photocatalytic, photoelectrochemical and electrolytic splitting of seawater," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    4. Sheng, Mingyue Selena & Sreenivasan, Ajith Viswanath & Sharp, Basil & Du, Bo, 2021. "Well-to-wheel analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption for electric vehicles: A comparative study in Oceania," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Rafael d’Amore-Domenech & Isabel Carrillo & Emilio Navarro & Teresa J. Leo, 2023. "Alkaline Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production at Sea: Perspectives on Economic Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Damian Amiruddin & Devinder Mahajan & Dufei Fang & Wenbin Wang & Peng Wang & Benjamin S. Hsiao, 2023. "A Facile Ultrapure Water Production Method for Electrolysis via Multilayered Photovoltaic/Membrane Distillation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Hunt, Julian David & Nascimento, Andreas & Nascimento, Nazem & Vieira, Lara Werncke & Romero, Oldrich Joel, 2022. "Possible pathways for oil and gas companies in a sustainable future: From the perspective of a hydrogen economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Mei, Mei & Chen, Zhihua, 2021. "Evaluation and selection of sustainable hydrogen production technology with hybrid uncertain sustainability indicators based on rough-fuzzy BWM-DEA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 716-730.
    9. Fengyuan Yan & Xiaolong Han & Qianwei Cheng & Yamin Yan & Qi Liao & Yongtu Liang, 2022. "Scenario-Based Comparative Analysis for Coupling Electricity and Hydrogen Storage in Clean Oilfield Energy Supply System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    10. Radosław Kaplan & Michał Kopacz, 2020. "Economic Conditions for Developing Hydrogen Production Based on Coal Gasification with Carbon Capture and Storage in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Luis Camargo & Daniel Comas & Yulineth Cardenas Escorcia & Anibal Alviz-Meza & Gaylord Carrillo Caballero & Ivan Portnoy, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Global Trends around Hydrogen Production Based on the Scopus Database in the Period 2011–2021," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Bompard, E.F. & Corgnati, S.P. & Grosso, D. & Huang, T. & Mietti, G. & Profumo, F., 2022. "Multidimensional assessment of the energy sustainability and carbon pricing impacts along the Belt and Road Initiative," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    13. Ariel Chiche & Göran Lindbergh & Ivan Stenius & Carina Lagergren, 2021. "Including Heat Balance When Designing the Energy System of Fuel Cell-Powered AUVs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Michel Noussan & Pier Paolo Raimondi & Rossana Scita & Manfred Hafner, 2020. "The Role of Green and Blue Hydrogen in the Energy Transition—A Technological and Geopolitical Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    15. Ibrahim, Omar S. & Singlitico, Alessandro & Proskovics, Roberts & McDonagh, Shane & Desmond, Cian & Murphy, Jerry D., 2022. "Dedicated large-scale floating offshore wind to hydrogen: Assessing design variables in proposed typologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ren, Lei & Zhou, Sheng & Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin, 2022. "Greenhouse gas life cycle analysis of China's fuel cell medium- and heavy-duty trucks under segmented usage scenarios and vehicle types," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. Quarton, Christopher J. & Samsatli, Sheila, 2020. "The value of hydrogen and carbon capture, storage and utilisation in decarbonising energy: Insights from integrated value chain optimisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    3. Amin Vafadarnikjoo & Madjid Tavana & Tiago Botelho & Konstantinos Chalvatzis, 2020. "A neutrosophic enhanced best–worst method for considering decision-makers’ confidence in the best and worst criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 391-418, June.
    4. Eveloy, Valerie, 2019. "Hybridization of solid oxide electrolysis-based power-to-methane with oxyfuel combustion and carbon dioxide utilization for energy storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 550-571.
    5. Ibrahim, Omar S. & Singlitico, Alessandro & Proskovics, Roberts & McDonagh, Shane & Desmond, Cian & Murphy, Jerry D., 2022. "Dedicated large-scale floating offshore wind to hydrogen: Assessing design variables in proposed typologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Lee, Boreum & Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Hyunjun & Lim, Hankwon, 2021. "Which water electrolysis technology is appropriate?: Critical insights of potential water electrolysis for green ammonia production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    7. Kim, Sunwoo & Choi, Yechan & Park, Joungho & Adams, Derrick & Heo, Seongmin & Lee, Jay H., 2024. "Multi-period, multi-timescale stochastic optimization model for simultaneous capacity investment and energy management decisions for hybrid Micro-Grids with green hydrogen production under uncertainty," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PA).
    8. Oliver Wagner & Thomas Adisorn & Lena Tholen & Dagmar Kiyar, 2020. "Surviving the Energy Transition: Development of a Proposal for Evaluating Sustainable Business Models for Incumbents in Germany’s Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    9. d'Amore-Domenech, Rafael & Leo, Teresa J. & Pollet, Bruno G., 2021. "Bulk power transmission at sea: Life cycle cost comparison of electricity and hydrogen as energy vectors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    10. Tunde Aderinto & Hua Li, 2020. "Effect of Spatial and Temporal Resolution Data on Design and Power Capture of a Heaving Point Absorber," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ieva Ubarte & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2017. "MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-30, April.
    12. Gómez-Limón, José A. & Gutiérrez-Martín, Carlos & Riesgo, Laura, 2016. "Modeling at farm level: Positive Multi-Attribute Utility Programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 17-27.
    13. Trowell, K.A. & Goroshin, S. & Frost, D.L. & Bergthorson, J.M., 2020. "Aluminum and its role as a recyclable, sustainable carrier of renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    14. Mikovits, Christian & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Wehrle, Sebastian & Baumgartner, Johann & Schmidt, Johannes, 2021. "Stronger together: Multi-annual variability of hydrogen production supported by wind power in Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PB).
    15. Pasta, Edoardo & Faedo, Nicolás & Mattiazzo, Giuliana & Ringwood, John V., 2023. "Towards data-driven and data-based control of wave energy systems: Classification, overview, and critical assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    16. Barbara Uliasz-Misiak & Joanna Lewandowska-Śmierzchalska & Rafał Matuła & Radosław Tarkowski, 2022. "Prospects for the Implementation of Underground Hydrogen Storage in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Ezbakhe, Fatine & Pérez-Foguet, Agustí, 2021. "Decision analysis for sustainable development: The case of renewable energy planning under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 601-613.
    18. Manuel García-Díaz & Bruno Pereiras & Celia Miguel-González & Laudino Rodríguez & Jesús Fernández-Oro, 2021. "CFD Analysis of the Performance of a Double Decker Turbine for Wave Energy Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Gorre, Jachin & Ortloff, Felix & van Leeuwen, Charlotte, 2019. "Production costs for synthetic methane in 2030 and 2050 of an optimized Power-to-Gas plant with intermediate hydrogen storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Zeyringer, Marianne & Fais, Birgit & Keppo, Ilkka & Price, James, 2018. "The potential of marine energy technologies in the UK – Evaluation from a systems perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1281-1293.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:133:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120304573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.