IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v66y2014icp605-611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of sludge properties on the direct gasification of dewatered sewage sludge in supercritical water

Author

Listed:
  • Gong, M.
  • Zhu, W.
  • Xu, Z.R.
  • Zhang, H.W.
  • Yang, H.P.

Abstract

In the present study, ten different types of dewatered sewage sludges were treated in supercritical water in a high-pressure autoclave under a given condition (at 400 °C, 60 min and 23 MPa). The feasibility of direct gasification and the effect of sludge properties on the gasification of dewatered sewage sludge with various properties in supercritical water were investigated. The results showed that dewatered sewage sludge with various water contents (73.48–88.51 wt%), organic matter contents (29.25–73.02 wt%, on dry basis) and inorganics can be directly gasified in supercritical water. The total gas and phenol production increased linearly with the increment of organic matter content in dewatered sewage sludge. The difference in hydrogen content in the gaseous product may be related to the content of water and inorganic as well as pH value of the sludge. The char/coke formed in the solid residue increased with decrement of water content, which inhibited the gasification reaction and resulted in the carbonization reaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Gong, M. & Zhu, W. & Xu, Z.R. & Zhang, H.W. & Yang, H.P., 2014. "Influence of sludge properties on the direct gasification of dewatered sewage sludge in supercritical water," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 605-611.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:66:y:2014:i:c:p:605-611
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148114000354
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pereira, Emanuele Graciosa & da Silva, Jadir Nogueira & de Oliveira, Jofran L. & Machado, Cássio S., 2012. "Sustainable energy: A review of gasification technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4753-4762.
    2. Guan, Qingqing & Wei, Chaohai & Shi, Huashun & Wu, Chaofei & Chai, Xin-Sheng, 2011. "Partial oxidative gasification of phenol for hydrogen in supercritical water," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2612-2616, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patel, Savankumar & Kundu, Sazal & Halder, Pobitra & Rickards, Lauren & Paz-Ferreiro, Jorge & Surapaneni, Aravind & Madapusi, Srinivasan & Shah, Kalpit, 2019. "Thermogravimetric Analysis of biosolids pyrolysis in the presence of mineral oxides," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 707-716.
    2. Wang, Liping & Chang, Yuzhi & Li, Aimin, 2019. "Hydrothermal carbonization for energy-efficient processing of sewage sludge: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 423-440.
    3. Kıpçak, Ekin & Akgün, Mesut, 2018. "Biofuel production from olive mill wastewater through its Ni/Al2O3 and Ru/Al2O3 catalyzed supercritical water gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 155-164.
    4. Czerwińska, Klaudia & Śliz, Maciej & Wilk, Małgorzata, 2022. "Hydrothermal carbonization process: Fundamentals, main parameter characteristics and possible applications including an effective method of SARS-CoV-2 mitigation in sewage sludge. A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Wądrzyk, Mariusz & Grzywacz, Przemysław & Janus, Rafał & Michalik, Marek, 2021. "A two-stage processing of cherry pomace via hydrothermal treatment followed by biochar gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 248-261.
    6. Yulin Hu & Rhea Gallant & Shakirudeen Salaudeen & Aitazaz A. Farooque & Sophia He, 2022. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Spent Coffee Grounds for Producing Solid Fuel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Alessio Siciliano & Carlo Limonti & Sanjeet Mehariya & Antonio Molino & Vincenza Calabrò, 2018. "Biofuel Production and Phosphorus Recovery through an Integrated Treatment of Agro-Industrial Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ismail, M.S. & Moghavvemi, M. & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2013. "Energy trends in Palestinian territories of West Bank and Gaza Strip: Possibilities for reducing the reliance on external energy sources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 117-129.
    2. Berrueco, C. & Montané, D. & Matas Güell, B. & del Alamo, G., 2014. "Effect of temperature and dolomite on tar formation during gasification of torrefied biomass in a pressurized fluidized bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 849-859.
    3. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.
    4. Burra, K.G. & Hussein, M.S. & Amano, R.S. & Gupta, A.K., 2016. "Syngas evolutionary behavior during chicken manure pyrolysis and air gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 408-415.
    5. Wang, Yuanqing & Jin, Fangming & Zeng, Xu & Ma, Cuixiang & Wang, Fengwen & Yao, Guodong & Jing, Zhenzi, 2013. "Catalytic activity of Ni3S2 and effects of reactor wall in hydrogen production from water with hydrogen sulphide as a reducer under hydrothermal conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 306-309.
    6. Šuhaj, Patrik & Husár, Jakub & Haydary, Juma & Annus, Július, 2022. "Experimental verification of a pilot pyrolysis/split product gasification (PSPG) unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    7. Sharma, Monikankana & N, Rakesh & Dasappa, S., 2016. "Solid oxide fuel cell operating with biomass derived producer gas: Status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 450-463.
    8. Santos Dalólio, Felipe & da Silva, Jadir Nogueira & Carneiro de Oliveira, Angélica Cássia & Ferreira Tinôco, Ilda de Fátima & Christiam Barbosa, Rúben & Resende, Michael de Oliveira & Teixeira Albino,, 2017. "Poultry litter as biomass energy: A review and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 941-949.
    9. Samiran, Nor Afzanizam & Jaafar, Mohammad Nazri Mohd & Ng, Jo-Han & Lam, Su Shiung & Chong, Cheng Tung, 2016. "Progress in biomass gasification technique – With focus on Malaysian palm biomass for syngas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1047-1062.
    10. Strzalka, Rafal & Schneider, Dietrich & Eicker, Ursula, 2017. "Current status of bioenergy technologies in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 801-820.
    11. Yapicioglu, Arda & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2019. "A review on clean ammonia as a potential fuel for power generators," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 96-108.
    12. Ruiz, J.A. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & Muñoz, P. & Mendívil, M.A., 2013. "Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 174-183.
    13. He, Chao & Chen, Chia-Lung & Giannis, Apostolos & Yang, Yanhui & Wang, Jing-Yuan, 2014. "Hydrothermal gasification of sewage sludge and model compounds for renewable hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1127-1142.
    14. Toledo, Mario & Arriagada, Andrés & Ripoll, Nicolás & Salgansky, Eugene A. & Mujeebu, Muhammad Abdul, 2023. "Hydrogen and syngas production by hybrid filtration combustion: Progress and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    15. Huang, Dan & Wu, Zan & Sunden, Bengt & Li, Wei, 2016. "A brief review on convection heat transfer of fluids at supercritical pressures in tubes and the recent progress," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 494-505.
    16. Anufriev, I.S., 2021. "Review of water/steam addition in liquid-fuel combustion systems for NOx reduction: Waste-to-energy trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    17. Robert S. Frazier & Enze Jin & Ajay Kumar, 2015. "Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar versus Metal Catalysts Used in Syngas Cleaning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
    18. Berrueco, C. & Recari, J. & Güell, B. Matas & Alamo, G. del, 2014. "Pressurized gasification of torrefied woody biomass in a lab scale fluidized bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 68-78.
    19. Im-orb, Karittha & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2016. "Techno-environmental analysis of the biomass gasification and Fischer-Tropsch integrated process for the co-production of bio-fuel and power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 121-132.
    20. Fernando, Niranjan & Narayana, Mahinsasa, 2016. "A comprehensive two dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics model for an updraft biomass gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 698-710.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:66:y:2014:i:c:p:605-611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.