IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v237y2024ipas0960148124015775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heat in the news: Geothermal energy in Chilean newspaper coverage

Author

Listed:
  • Vargas-Payera, Sofía

Abstract

Although Chile has abundant geothermal resources and is home to the first geothermal power plant in South America, the country faces uncertainties regarding the future development of geothermal energy. Lack of economic incentives, insufficient regulatory framework, and social opposition to geothermal power plant projects are some of the main challenges faced in the last years. To reflect on the pitfalls of the geothermal energy public debate and promote the integration of social aspects in the geothermal energy discussion, this study examines how geothermal energy has been portrayed in two influential Chilean newspapers from 2008 to 2021. Based on the idea that the mass media plays a critical role in public perception, this paper presents a framing analysis of 259 newspaper press to reflect on the public discourse of geothermal energy. The study shows that the media focused mainly on deep, high-enthalpy geothermal projects and the energy concession market. Geothermal energy has been mostly part of the finance discussion, and the coverage has been primarily event-driven, with limited visibility beyond specific events. Two events, the controversial exploration project in El Tatio (2009) and the successful commissioning of the first geothermal plant Cerro Pabellón (2017) attracted significant attention and presented geothermal energy from contrasting perspectives. Geothermal energy is mainly portrayed as an abundant, clean, and renewable energy source. However, geothermal development is described as a “business” or a “resource to be exploited”. There is a notable absence of discussion regarding the success of Latin American geothermal initiatives. Instead, European cases are the most prevalent in the discourse, serving as exemplars for potential future action. This result calls for the promotion of a new geothermal narrative and relationship with geothermal energy that acknowledges the experience from Latin American countries such as Costa Rica or El Salvador, the importance that geothermal energy has had for Indigenous peoples and promotes its use in the light of social demands for a more sustainable relationship with the environment, instead the main geothermal frame reproduces the commodification of natural resources in Chile.

Suggested Citation

  • Vargas-Payera, Sofía, 2024. "Heat in the news: Geothermal energy in Chilean newspaper coverage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:237:y:2024:i:pa:s0960148124015775
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.121509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124015775
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121509?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank W. Geels & Frans Berkhout & Detlef P. van Vuuren, 2016. "Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(6), pages 576-583, June.
    2. Baek, Haein & Chung, Ji-Bum & Yun, Gi Woong, 2021. "Differences in public perceptions of geothermal energy based on EGS technology in Korea after the Pohang earthquake: National vs. local," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Kubota, Hiromi & Hondo, Hiroki & Hienuki, Shunichi & Kaieda, Hideshi, 2013. "Determining barriers to developing geothermal power generation in Japan: Societal acceptance by stakeholders involved in hot springs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1079-1087.
    4. Pellizzone, Anna & Allansdottir, Agnes & De Franco, Roberto & Muttoni, Giovanni & Manzella, Adele, 2017. "Geothermal energy and the public: A case study on deliberative citizens’ engagement in central Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 561-570.
    5. Sanchez-Alfaro, Pablo & Sielfeld, Gerd & Campen, Bart Van & Dobson, Patrick & Fuentes, Víctor & Reed, Andy & Palma-Behnke, Rodrigo & Morata, Diego, 2015. "Geothermal barriers, policies and economics in Chile – Lessons for the Andes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1390-1401.
    6. Simone Carr-Cornish & Lygia Romanach, 2014. "Differences in Public Perceptions of Geothermal Energy Technology in Australia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Anderson, Austin & Rezaie, Behnaz, 2019. "Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 18-34.
    8. Irarrazaval, Felipe, 2022. "Social protest at mining territories: Examining contentious politics at mining districts in Chile," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. Romanach, Lygia & Carr-Cornish, Simone & Muriuki, Grace, 2015. "Societal acceptance of an emerging energy technology: How is geothermal energy portrayed in Australian media?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1143-1150.
    10. Ruef, Franziska & Ejderyan, Olivier, 2021. "Rowing, steering or anchoring? Public values for geothermal energy governance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Dowd, Anne-Maree & Boughen, Naomi & Ashworth, Peta & Carr-Cornish, Simone, 2011. "Geothermal technology in Australia: Investigating social acceptance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6301-6307, October.
    12. Soltani, M. & Moradi Kashkooli, Farshad & Souri, Mohammad & Rafiei, Behnam & Jabarifar, Mohammad & Gharali, Kobra & Nathwani, Jatin S., 2021. "Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Solano-Olivares, K. & Santoyo, E. & Santoyo-Castelazo, E., 2024. "Integrated sustainability assessment framework for geothermal energy technologies: A literature review and a new proposal of sustainability indicators for Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Soltani, M. & Moradi Kashkooli, Farshad & Souri, Mohammad & Rafiei, Behnam & Jabarifar, Mohammad & Gharali, Kobra & Nathwani, Jatin S., 2021. "Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Baek, Haein & Chung, Ji-Bum & Yun, Gi Woong, 2021. "Differences in public perceptions of geothermal energy based on EGS technology in Korea after the Pohang earthquake: National vs. local," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Knoblauch, Theresa A.K. & Trutnevyte, Evelina & Stauffacher, Michael, 2019. "Siting deep geothermal energy: Acceptance of various risk and benefit scenarios in a Swiss-German cross-national study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 807-816.
    5. Spampatti, Tobia & Hahnel, Ulf J.J. & Trutnevyte, Evelina & Brosch, Tobias, 2022. "Short and long-term dominance of negative information in shaping public energy perceptions: The case of shallow geothermal systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Anastasia Ioannou & Gioia Falcone & Christina Baisch & Georgie Friederichs & Jan Hildebrand, 2023. "A Decision Support Tool for Social Engagement, Alternative Financing and Risk Mitigation of Geothermal Energy Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Barbara Pavlakovič & Milica Rančić Demir & Nejc Pozvek & Maja Turnšek, 2021. "Role of Tourism in Promoting Geothermal Energy: Public Interest and Motivation for Geothermal Energy Tourism in Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Idroes, Ghalieb Mutig & Hardi, Irsan & Hilal, Iin Shabrina & Utami, Resty Tamara & Noviandy, Teuku Rizky & Idroes, Rinaldi, 2024. "Economic growth and environmental impact: Assessing the role of geothermal energy in developing and developed countries," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    9. Zhang, Jiansong & Liu, Yongsheng & Lv, Jianguo & Gao, Wenlong, 2024. "The flow and heat transfer characteristics of supercritical mixed-phase CO2 and N2 in a 3D self-affine rough fracture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    10. Pellizzone, Anna & Allansdottir, Agnes & De Franco, Roberto & Muttoni, Giovanni & Manzella, Adele, 2017. "Geothermal energy and the public: A case study on deliberative citizens’ engagement in central Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 561-570.
    11. Liang, Yanzhong & Teng, Bailu & Luo, Wanjing, 2024. "A new semi-analytical model for studying the performance of deep U-shaped borehole heat exchangers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    12. Romanach, Lygia & Carr-Cornish, Simone & Muriuki, Grace, 2015. "Societal acceptance of an emerging energy technology: How is geothermal energy portrayed in Australian media?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1143-1150.
    13. Renato Somma & Daniela Blessent & Jasmin Raymond & Madeline Constance & Lucy Cotton & Giuseppe De Natale & Alessandro Fedele & Maria Jose Jurado & Kirsten Marcia & Mafalda Miranda & Claudia Troise & T, 2021. "Review of Recent Drilling Projects in Unconventional Geothermal Resources at Campi Flegrei Caldera, Cornubian Batholith, and Williston Sedimentary Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Elisa Bustaffa & Olivia Curzio & Fabrizio Bianchi & Fabrizio Minichilli & Daniela Nuvolone & Davide Petri & Giorgia Stoppa & Fabio Voller & Liliana Cori, 2022. "Community Concern about the Health Effects of Pollutants: Risk Perception in an Italian Geothermal Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Muhammad Umar & Abraham Ayobamiji Awosusi & Oluwatayomi Rereloluwa Adegboye & Opeoluwa Seun Ojekemi, 2024. "Geothermal energy and carbon emissions nexus in leading geothermal-consuming nations: Evidence from nonparametric analysis," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(5), pages 2726-2752, August.
    16. Wang, Gaosheng & Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Yang, Ruiyue & Yulong, Feixue & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng, 2021. "Heat extraction analysis of a novel multilateral-well coaxial closed-loop geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 974-986.
    17. Rakel Kristjansdottir & Henner Busch, 2019. "Towards a Neutral North—The Urban Low Carbon Transitions of Akureyri, Iceland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Wang, Gang & Zhang, Zhen & Lin, Jianqing, 2024. "Multi-energy complementary power systems based on solar energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    19. Maswabi, Mareledi Gina & Chun, Jungwoo & Chung, Suh-Yong, 2021. "Barriers to energy transition: A case of Botswana," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Cristina Sáez Blázquez & Ignacio Martín Nieto & Javier Carrasco & Pedro Carrasco & Daniel Porras & Miguel Ángel Maté-González & Arturo Farfán Martín & Diego González-Aguilera, 2024. "Applying Deep Electrical-Resistivity Tomography Techniques for the Exploration of Medium- and Low-Geothermal Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:237:y:2024:i:pa:s0960148124015775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.