IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v216y2023ics0960148123009540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards sequential sensor placements on a wind farm to maximize lifetime energy and profit

Author

Listed:
  • Yildiz, Anil
  • Mern, John
  • Kochenderfer, Mykel J.
  • Howland, Michael F.

Abstract

The optimal design of a wind farm which maximizes energy production depends on the spatially variable wind flow field. However, due to the complexity associated with modeling atmospheric winds, especially in the presence of complex terrain, the wind field is inherently uncertain. Uncertainty in the wind field during the design stage reduces the likelihood that the constructed wind farm achieves maximum energy production for a given number of turbines. As such, contemporary wind farms are designed through a two step process. First, experimental data collected from simultaneously constructed meteorological towers are used, along with simplified engineering flow models, to estimate the flow field. Then, the estimated flow field is used to place wind turbines to maximize an objective function, such as wind farm energy production. To increase wind farm energy production and reduce its uncertainty, we propose a farm design methodology that combines both the sensor placement and wind turbine location selection steps into a single sequential decision-making process. Future sensor placements sequentially leverage information gained from previous ones. Rather than placing sensors to attempt to reduce wind field uncertainty, we select sensor locations to maximize wind farm profit. Using profit as the objective function balances the increased revenue, from the increased energy production associated with improved wind field knowledge, against the higher costs from additional sensors. In this proof-of-concept study, we use idealized numerical case studies to demonstrate that sequential wind field sensor placement, compared to concurrent placement, improves the robustness of the resulting wind farm design to imperfect initial knowledge of the wind field. The numerical results suggest a wind farm annual energy output (lifetime profit) increase of approximately 6.55% (16.78%), equaling roughly 0.7 GWh/year (0.35 million USD) per turbine, compared to a typical, two-step wind farm design process which first places sensors concurrently then designs the farm thereafter. Our results also indicate that using a far-sighted sequential method as proposed in this paper outperforms standard metrics, such as entropy, that solely focus on wind field uncertainty minimization. These proof-of-concept findings suggest that future research should be dedicated to improving the wind farm design process through sequential decision-making under uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Yildiz, Anil & Mern, John & Kochenderfer, Mykel J. & Howland, Michael F., 2023. "Towards sequential sensor placements on a wind farm to maximize lifetime energy and profit," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:216:y:2023:i:c:s0960148123009540
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148123009540
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abe, Sumiyoshi & Rajagopal, A.K, 2001. "Nonadditive conditional entropy and its significance for local realism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 157-164.
    2. Caselton, W. F. & Zidek, J. V., 1984. "Optimal monitoring network designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 223-227, August.
    3. Chowdhury, Souma & Zhang, Jie & Messac, Achille & Castillo, Luciano, 2012. "Unrestricted wind farm layout optimization (UWFLO): Investigating key factors influencing the maximum power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 16-30.
    4. J. K. Lundquist & K. K. DuVivier & D. Kaffine & J. M. Tomaszewski, 2019. "Publisher Correction: Costs and consequences of wind turbine wake effects arising from uncoordinated wind energy development," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(3), pages 251-251, March.
    5. Marmidis, Grigorios & Lazarou, Stavros & Pyrgioti, Eleftheria, 2008. "Optimal placement of wind turbines in a wind park using Monte Carlo simulation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1455-1460.
    6. Durán, Pablo & Meiβner, Cathérine & Casso, Pau, 2020. "A new meso-microscale coupled modelling framework for wind resource assessment: A validation study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 538-554.
    7. Chen, Le & Harding, Chris & Sharma, Anupam & MacDonald, Erin, 2016. "Modeling noise and lease soft costs improves wind farm design and cost-of-energy predictions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 849-859.
    8. J. K. Lundquist & K. K. DuVivier & D. Kaffine & J. M. Tomaszewski, 2019. "Costs and consequences of wind turbine wake effects arising from uncoordinated wind energy development," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 26-34, January.
    9. Michael F. Howland & Jesús Bas Quesada & Juan José Pena Martínez & Felipe Palou Larrañaga & Neeraj Yadav & Jasvipul S. Chawla & Varun Sivaram & John O. Dabiri, 2022. "Collective wind farm operation based on a predictive model increases utility-scale energy production," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(9), pages 818-827, September.
    10. Chun-Wa Ko & Jon Lee & Maurice Queyranne, 1995. "An Exact Algorithm for Maximum Entropy Sampling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 684-691, August.
    11. Bastankhah, Majid & Porté-Agel, Fernando, 2014. "A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 116-123.
    12. Saavedra-Moreno, B. & Salcedo-Sanz, S. & Paniagua-Tineo, A. & Prieto, L. & Portilla-Figueras, A., 2011. "Seeding evolutionary algorithms with heuristics for optimal wind turbines positioning in wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2838-2844.
    13. José F. Herbert-Acero & Oliver Probst & Pierre-Elouan Réthoré & Gunner Chr. Larsen & Krystel K. Castillo-Villar, 2014. "A Review of Methodological Approaches for the Design and Optimization of Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-87, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guirguis, David & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2017. "Gradient-based multidisciplinary design of wind farms with continuous-variable formulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 279-291.
    2. Guirguis, David & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2016. "Toward efficient optimization of wind farm layouts: Utilizing exact gradient information," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 110-123.
    3. Nicolas Kirchner-Bossi & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2018. "Realistic Wind Farm Layout Optimization through Genetic Algorithms Using a Gaussian Wake Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Abdelsalam, Ali M. & El-Shorbagy, M.A., 2018. "Optimization of wind turbines siting in a wind farm using genetic algorithm based local search," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 748-755.
    5. Azlan, F. & Kurnia, J.C. & Tan, B.T. & Ismadi, M.-Z., 2021. "Review on optimisation methods of wind farm array under three classical wind condition problems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Russell McKenna & Stefan Pfenninger & Heidi Heinrichs & Johannes Schmidt & Iain Staffell & Katharina Gruber & Andrea N. Hahmann & Malte Jansen & Michael Klingler & Natascha Landwehr & Xiaoli Guo Lars', 2021. "Reviewing methods and assumptions for high-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy potential assessments," Papers 2103.09781, arXiv.org.
    7. Dhoot, Aditya & Antonini, Enrico G.A. & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2021. "Optimizing wind farms layouts for maximum energy production using probabilistic inference: Benchmarking reveals superior computational efficiency and scalability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    8. McKenna, Russell & Pfenninger, Stefan & Heinrichs, Heidi & Schmidt, Johannes & Staffell, Iain & Bauer, Christian & Gruber, Katharina & Hahmann, Andrea N. & Jansen, Malte & Klingler, Michael & Landwehr, 2022. "High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 659-684.
    9. Anagnostopoulos, Sokratis J. & Bauer, Jens & Clare, Mariana C.A. & Piggott, Matthew D., 2023. "Accelerated wind farm yaw and layout optimisation with multi-fidelity deep transfer learning wake models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    10. Gu, Bo & Meng, Hang & Ge, Mingwei & Zhang, Hongtao & Liu, Xinyu, 2021. "Cooperative multiagent optimization method for wind farm power delivery maximization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    11. Pryor, Sara C. & Barthelmie, Rebecca J., 2024. "Wind shadows impact planning of large offshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    12. Feng, Ju & Shen, Wen Zhong, 2017. "Design optimization of offshore wind farms with multiple types of wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1283-1297.
    13. Nicolas Kirchner-Bossi & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2021. "Wind Farm Area Shape Optimization Using Newly Developed Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-25, July.
    14. Serrano González, Javier & Burgos Payán, Manuel & Santos, Jesús Manuel Riquelme & González-Longatt, Francisco, 2014. "A review and recent developments in the optimal wind-turbine micro-siting problem," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 133-144.
    15. Hegazy Rezk & Ahmed Fathy & Ahmed A. Zaki Diab & Mujahed Al-Dhaifallah, 2019. "The Application of Water Cycle Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Placement of Wind Turbines in Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Brogna, Roberto & Feng, Ju & Sørensen, Jens Nørkær & Shen, Wen Zhong & Porté-Agel, Fernando, 2020. "A new wake model and comparison of eight algorithms for layout optimization of wind farms in complex terrain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    17. Parada, Leandro & Herrera, Carlos & Flores, Paulo & Parada, Victor, 2018. "Assessing the energy benefit of using a wind turbine micro-siting model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 591-601.
    18. Yang, Shanghui & Deng, Xiaowei & Yang, Kun, 2024. "Machine-learning-based wind farm optimization through layout design and yaw control," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    19. Lin, Jian Wei & Zhu, Wei Jun & Shen, Wen Zhong, 2022. "New engineering wake model for wind farm applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 1354-1363.
    20. Gu, Huajie & Wang, Jun, 2013. "Irregular-shape wind farm micro-siting optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 535-544.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:216:y:2023:i:c:s0960148123009540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.