IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v177y2021icp1087-1101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic and thermo-mechanical design of tubular sCO2 central-receivers

Author

Listed:
  • Fernández-Torrijos, M.
  • González-Gómez, P.A.
  • Sobrino, C.
  • Santana, D.

Abstract

Supercritical CO2 central-receivers must withstand high temperatures and pressures combined with cyclic operation, which makes the solar receiver susceptible to creep-fatigue failure. In this work, a creep-fatigue analysis of a sCO2 Inconel 740H tubular receiver of a 2 MWe solar tower plant has been accomplished to study the influence of the tube size on the receiver and solar field design. A 2D numerical model of the tubular receiver that accounts for the thermal conduction in both radial and circumferential directions was developed to determine the sCO2 and wall temperature profile, which is crucial for the creep-fatigue calculations. The receiver flux distribution, which is an input to the model, was obtained with SolarPILOT, while a conventional recompression model was used to calculate the cycle efficiency and inlet temperature to the receiver. Comparison of the results of the 2D model with those of a 1D model showed that the 1D model overestimates the creep fatigue rupture time by two orders of magnitude. Furthermore, the efficiency and costs of the heliostat field and receiver were calculated for different receiver tube sizes. Smaller tubes allowed a higher maximum heat flux leading to smaller receiver and heliostat field designs, which resulted in higher overall efficiency of the power plant and lower material costs. For a design ensuring 25 year receiver lifetime the minimum sCO2 solar receiver cost, 345 €/kWth, was obtained for the smallest pipe diameter.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernández-Torrijos, M. & González-Gómez, P.A. & Sobrino, C. & Santana, D., 2021. "Economic and thermo-mechanical design of tubular sCO2 central-receivers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1087-1101.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:177:y:2021:i:c:p:1087-1101
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148121009137
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yao, Lichao & Zou, Zhengping, 2020. "A one-dimensional design methodology for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles: Integration of cycle conceptual design and components preliminary design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    2. Linares, José I. & Montes, María J. & Cantizano, Alexis & Sánchez, Consuelo, 2020. "A novel supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton power cycle for power tower concentrating solar plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    3. Prieto, Cristina & Fereres, Sonia & Ruiz-Cabañas, Francisco Javier & Rodriguez-Sanchez, Alfonso & Montero, Cristina, 2020. "Carbonate molten salt solar thermal pilot facility: Plant design, commissioning and operation up to 700 °C," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 528-541.
    4. Zhang, Qiangqiang & Li, Xin & Wang, Zhifeng & Zhang, Jinbai & El-Hefni, Baligh & Xu, Li, 2015. "Modeling and simulation of a molten salt cavity receiver with Dymola," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1373-1384.
    5. Linares, José Ignacio & Cantizano, Alexis & Arenas, Eva & Moratilla, Beatriz Yolanda & Martín-Palacios, Víctor & Batet, Lluis, 2017. "Recuperated versus single-recuperator re-compressed supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycles for DEMO fusion reactor based on dual coolant lithium lead blanket," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 307-317.
    6. Liao, Zhirong & Li, Xin & Xu, Chao & Chang, Chun & Wang, Zhifeng, 2014. "Allowable flux density on a solar central receiver," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 747-753.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.R. & Laporte-Azcué, M. & Montoya, A. & Hernández-Jiménez, F., 2022. "Non-conventional tube shapes for lifetime extend of solar external receivers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 535-546.
    2. Pérez-Álvarez, R. & Montoya, A. & López-Puente, J. & Santana, D., 2023. "Solar power tower plants with Bimetallic receiver tubes: A thermomechanical study of two- and three-layer composite tubes configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    3. Zhu, Jianlu & Xie, Naiya & Miao, Qing & Li, Zihe & Hu, Qihui & Yan, Feng & Li, Yuxing, 2024. "Simulation of boost path and phase control method in supercritical CO2 pipeline commissioning process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linares, José I. & Montes, María J. & Cantizano, Alexis & Sánchez, Consuelo, 2020. "A novel supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton power cycle for power tower concentrating solar plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    2. Zhang, Qiangqiang & Chang, Zheshao & Fu, Mingkai & Nie, Fuliang & Ren, Ting & Li, Xin, 2023. "Performance analysis of a light uniform device for the solar receiver or reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Zhang, Qiangqiang & Li, Xin & Wang, Zhifeng & Li, Zhi & Liu, Hong, 2018. "Function testing and failure analysis of control system for molten salt receiver system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 260-268.
    4. Xu, Li & Stein, Wesley & Kim, Jin-Soo & Wang, Zhifeng, 2018. "Three-dimensional transient numerical model for the thermal performance of the solar receiver," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 550-566.
    5. Caron, Simon & Garrido, Jorge & Ballestrín, Jesus & Sutter, Florian & Röger, Marc & Manzano-Agugliaro, Francisco, 2022. "A comparative analysis of opto-thermal figures of merit for high temperature solar thermal absorber coatings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Jobel Jose & Rajesh Kanna Parthasarathy & Senthil Kumar Arumugam, 2023. "Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Combined Cooling Heating and Power System with Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Thanganadar, Dhinesh & Fornarelli, Francesco & Camporeale, Sergio & Asfand, Faisal & Patchigolla, Kumar, 2021. "Off-design and annual performance analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle with thermal storage for CSP application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    8. Michalski, Sebastian & Hanak, Dawid P. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2020. "Advanced power cycles for coal-fired power plants based on calcium looping combustion: A techno-economic feasibility assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    9. Kravanja, Gregor & Zajc, Gašper & Knez, Željko & Škerget, Mojca & Marčič, Simon & Knez, Maša H., 2018. "Heat transfer performance of CO2, ethane and their azeotropic mixture under supercritical conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 190-201.
    10. Manzolini, Giampaolo & Lucca, Gaia & Binotti, Marco & Lozza, Giovanni, 2021. "A two-step procedure for the selection of innovative high temperature heat transfer fluids in solar tower power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 807-822.
    11. Gao, Lei & Cao, Tao & Hwang, Yunho & Radermacher, Reinhard, 2022. "Robustness analysis in supercritical CO2 power generation system configuration optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    12. Jing Liu & Yongqing He & Xianliang Lei, 2019. "Heat-Transfer Characteristics of Liquid Sodium in a Solar Receiver Tube with a Nonuniform Heat Flux," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Ma, Tingshan & Li, Zhengkuan & Lv, Kai & Chang, Dongfeng & Hu, Wenshuai & Zou, Ying, 2024. "Design and performance analysis of deep peak shaving scheme for thermal power units based on high-temperature molten salt heat storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    14. Cristina Prieto & Sonia Fereres & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2020. "The Role of Innovation in Industry Product Deployment: Developing Thermal Energy Storage for Concentrated Solar Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Arias, I. & Cardemil, J. & Zarza, E. & Valenzuela, L. & Escobar, R., 2022. "Latest developments, assessments and research trends for next generation of concentrated solar power plants using liquid heat transfer fluids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Daabo, Ahmed M. & Mahmoud, Saad & Al-Dadah, Raya K. & Ahmad, Abdalqader, 2017. "Numerical investigation of pitch value on thermal performance of solar receiver for solar powered Brayton cycle application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 523-539.
    17. Marta Muñoz & Antonio Rovira & María José Montes, 2022. "Thermodynamic cycles for solar thermal power plants: A review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), March.
    18. Conroy, Tim & Collins, Maurice N. & Grimes, Ronan, 2020. "A review of steady-state thermal and mechanical modelling on tubular solar receivers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Zhang, Li & Fang, Jiabin & Wei, Jinjia & Yang, Guidong, 2017. "Numerical investigation on the thermal performance of molten salt cavity receivers with different structures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 966-978.
    20. Son, Seongmin & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2018. "Application of adjoint sensitivity analysis method to supercritical CO2 power cycle optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1153-1164.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:177:y:2021:i:c:p:1087-1101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.