IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v140y2019icp722-736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel distance metric for evaluating impact of wind integration on power systems

Author

Listed:
  • Samal, Rajat Kanti
  • Tripathy, M.

Abstract

The purported social, economic and environmental benefits are resulting in increased wind penetration in existing power systems. However, due to inherent uncertainty of wind energy, thermal generators are expected to maintain security and reliability of power systems. Further, in view of the huge investments in existing power plant installations, thermal power may not be completely replaced by renewable energy sources such as wind power in near future. Therefore, reduction in capacity factor of the existing thermal generators due to wind integration is a major policy concern. This aspect must be juxtaposed with benefits of wind integration such as cost savings and emission reduction. The current study introduces a Capacity Factor Violation Index (CFVI) to evaluate the impact of wind integration on capacity factor of thermal generators. A distance metric comprising of cost savings, emission reduction, network losses and CFVI is proposed based on Compromise Programming (CP). Sensitivity analysis is performed by varying the wind penetration and turbine ratings and the impact on the distance metric is investigated. The proposed methodology is comprehensively demonstrated in eleven popular test power systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Samal, Rajat Kanti & Tripathy, M., 2019. "A novel distance metric for evaluating impact of wind integration on power systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 722-736.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:140:y:2019:i:c:p:722-736
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148119303994
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.094?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Capellaro, Mark, 2016. "Prediction of site specific wind energy value factors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 430-436.
    2. Mokryani, Geev & Hu, Yim Fun & Papadopoulos, Panagiotis & Niknam, Taher & Aghaei, Jamshid, 2017. "Deterministic approach for active distribution networks planning with high penetration of wind and solar power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 942-951.
    3. Chen, F. & Huang, G.H. & Fan, Y.R. & Chen, J.P., 2017. "A copula-based fuzzy chance-constrained programming model and its application to electric power generation systems planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 291-309.
    4. Osório, G.J. & Lujano-Rojas, J.M. & Matias, J.C.O. & Catalão, J.P.S., 2015. "A probabilistic approach to solve the economic dispatch problem with intermittent renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 949-959.
    5. Mokryani, Geev & Hu, Yim Fun & Pillai, Prashant & Rajamani, Haile-Selassie, 2017. "Active distribution networks planning with high penetration of wind power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 40-49.
    6. Brancucci Martinez-Anido, Carlo & Brinkman, Greg & Hodge, Bri-Mathias, 2016. "The impact of wind power on electricity prices," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 474-487.
    7. Baležentis, Tomas & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2017. "Multi-criteria ranking of energy generation scenarios with Monte Carlo simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 862-871.
    8. Shargh, S. & Khorshid ghazani, B. & Mohammadi-ivatloo, B. & Seyedi, H. & Abapour, M., 2016. "Probabilistic multi-objective optimal power flow considering correlated wind power and load uncertainties," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 10-21.
    9. Ghasemi, Mojtaba & Ghavidel, Sahand & Ghanbarian, Mohammad Mehdi & Gharibzadeh, Masihallah & Azizi Vahed, Ali, 2014. "Multi-objective optimal power flow considering the cost, emission, voltage deviation and power losses using multi-objective modified imperialist competitive algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 276-289.
    10. Nguyen, Christy & Ma, Chunbo & Hailu, Atakelty & Chalak, Morteza, 2016. "Factors influencing calculation of capacity value of wind power: A case study of the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 319-328.
    11. Simões, Teresa & Estanqueiro, Ana, 2016. "A new methodology for urban wind resource assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 598-605.
    12. Rahmani, Shima & Amjady, Nima, 2017. "A new optimal power flow approach for wind energy integrated power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 349-359.
    13. Liu, Fan & Bie, Zhaohong & Liu, Shiyu & Ding, Tao, 2017. "Day-ahead optimal dispatch for wind integrated power system considering zonal reserve requirements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 399-408.
    14. Akella, A.K. & Saini, R.P. & Sharma, M.P., 2009. "Social, economical and environmental impacts of renewable energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 390-396.
    15. Reddy, S. Surender, 2017. "Optimal scheduling of thermal-wind-solar power system with storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1357-1368.
    16. Kar, Sanjay Kumar & Sharma, Atul, 2015. "Wind power developments in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 264-275.
    17. Feijóo, Andrés & Villanueva, Daniel, 2016. "Assessing wind speed simulation methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 473-483.
    18. Thapar, Vinay & Agnihotri, Gayatri & Sethi, Vinod Krishna, 2011. "Critical analysis of methods for mathematical modelling of wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 3166-3177.
    19. Panse, Riddhi & Kathuria, Vinish, 2016. "Role of policy in deployment of wind energy: evidence across states of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 422-432.
    20. Jin, Jingliang & Zhou, Peng & Zhang, Mingming & Yu, Xianyu & Din, Hao, 2018. "Balancing low-carbon power dispatching strategy for wind power integrated system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 914-924.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morshed, Mohammad Javad & Hmida, Jalel Ben & Fekih, Afef, 2018. "A probabilistic multi-objective approach for power flow optimization in hybrid wind-PV-PEV systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1136-1149.
    2. Huang, Yuqing & Lan, Hai & Hong, Ying-Yi & Wen, Shuli & Yin, He, 2019. "Optimal generation scheduling for a deep-water semi-submersible drilling platform with uncertain renewable power generation and loads," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 897-907.
    3. Mohamed S. Hashish & Hany M. Hasanien & Haoran Ji & Abdulaziz Alkuhayli & Mohammed Alharbi & Tlenshiyeva Akmaral & Rania A. Turky & Francisco Jurado & Ahmed O. Badr, 2023. "Monte Carlo Simulation and a Clustering Technique for Solving the Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow Problem for Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Prajapati, Vijaykumar K. & Mahajan, Vasundhara, 2021. "Reliability assessment and congestion management of power system with energy storage system and uncertain renewable resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    5. Wang, Zhiwen & Shen, Chen & Liu, Feng, 2018. "A conditional model of wind power forecast errors and its application in scenario generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 771-785.
    6. Khaled Nusair & Lina Alhmoud, 2020. "Application of Equilibrium Optimizer Algorithm for Optimal Power Flow with High Penetration of Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-35, November.
    7. Sellak, Hamza & Ouhbi, Brahim & Frikh, Bouchra & Palomares, Iván, 2017. "Towards next-generation energy planning decision-making: An expert-based framework for intelligent decision support," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1544-1577.
    8. Li, Zening & Su, Su & Jin, Xiaolong & Chen, Houhe, 2021. "Distributed energy management for active distribution network considering aggregated office buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1073-1087.
    9. Khaled Nusair & Feras Alasali, 2020. "Optimal Power Flow Management System for a Power Network with Stochastic Renewable Energy Resources Using Golden Ratio Optimization Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-46, July.
    10. Antonio Rubens Baran Junior & Thelma S. Piazza Fernandes & Ricardo Augusto Borba, 2019. "Voltage Regulation Planning for Distribution Networks Using Multi-Scenario Three-Phase Optimal Power Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Ilia Shushpanov & Konstantin Suslov & Pavel Ilyushin & Denis N. Sidorov, 2021. "Towards the Flexible Distribution Networks Design Using the Reliability Performance Metric," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Yajing Gao & Wenhai Yang & Jing Zhu & Jiafeng Ren & Peng Li, 2017. "Evaluating the Effect of Distributed Generation on Power Supply Capacity in Active Distribution System Based on Sensitivity Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Nimisha Pandey & Heleen de Coninck & Ambuj D Sagar, 2022. "Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), March.
    14. Gyanendra Singh Sisodia & Einas Awad & Heba Alkhoja & Bruno S. Sergi, 2020. "Strategic business risk evaluation for sustainable energy investment and stakeholder engagement: A proposal for energy policy development in the Middle East through Khalifa funding and land subsidies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2789-2802, September.
    15. Cuadra, L. & Ocampo-Estrella, I. & Alexandre, E. & Salcedo-Sanz, S., 2019. "A study on the impact of easements in the deployment of wind farms near airport facilities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 566-588.
    16. Jordehi, A. Rezaee, 2018. "How to deal with uncertainties in electric power systems? A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 145-155.
    17. Zubo, Rana H.A. & Mokryani, Geev & Abd-Alhameed, Raed, 2018. "Optimal operation of distribution networks with high penetration of wind and solar power within a joint active and reactive distribution market environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 713-722.
    18. Zhou, Siyu & Han, Yang & Yang, Ping & Mahmoud, Karar & Lehtonen, Matti & Darwish, Mohamed M.F. & Zalhaf, Amr S., 2022. "An optimal network constraint-based joint expansion planning model for modern distribution networks with multi-types intermittent RERs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 137-151.
    19. Xie, Shiwei & Hu, Zhijian & Zhou, Daming & Li, Yan & Kong, Shunfei & Lin, Weiwei & Zheng, Yunfei, 2018. "Multi-objective active distribution networks expansion planning by scenario-based stochastic programming considering uncertain and random weight of network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 207-225.
    20. Li, M.S. & Lin, Z.J. & Ji, T.Y. & Wu, Q.H., 2018. "Risk constrained stochastic economic dispatch considering dependence of multiple wind farms using pair-copula," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 967-978.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:140:y:2019:i:c:p:722-736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.