IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v127y2018icp474-480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synergies from co-digesting grass or clover silages with cattle slurry in in vitro batch anaerobic digestion

Author

Listed:
  • Himanshu, H.
  • Murphy, J.D.
  • Grant, J.
  • O'Kiely, P.

Abstract

Co-digestion of forage silage with cattle slurry can greatly extend the stability of methanogenesis as compared to mono-digestion of the silage. Biogas and methane yields of the mixtures of perennial ryegrass silage (grass harvested at two growth stages i.e. stem elongation vs. floral development) with cattle slurry and of red clover silage (clover harvested at two growth stages i.e. mid-vegetative vs. early seed-pod development) with cattle slurry were measured, and synergistic effects were investigated. Silage and slurry were incubated as sole substrates or as part of binary mixtures (forage silage:cattle slurry ratios of 1:0, 0.75:0.25, 0.5:0.5, 0.25:0.75 and 0:1 on a volatile solid basis). The maximum measured synergistic effects for perennial ryegrass silages with cattle slurry and red clover silages with cattle slurry were observed at 0.75:0.25 and 0.5:0.5 (forage silge:cattle slurry), respectively. The forage silage:cattle slurry ratio to produce the maximum synergistic effects differed with the forage species ensiled and its growth stage when harvested.

Suggested Citation

  • Himanshu, H. & Murphy, J.D. & Grant, J. & O'Kiely, P., 2018. "Synergies from co-digesting grass or clover silages with cattle slurry in in vitro batch anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 474-480.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:127:y:2018:i:c:p:474-480
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148118305111
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McEniry, J. & Allen, E. & Murphy, J.D. & O'Kiely, P., 2014. "Grass for biogas production: The impact of silage fermentation characteristics on methane yield in two contrasting biomethane potential test systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 524-530.
    2. Thamsiriroj, T. & Nizami, A.S. & Murphy, J.D., 2012. "Why does mono-digestion of grass silage fail in long term operation?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 64-76.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raquel Iglesias & Raúl Muñoz & María Polanco & Israel Díaz & Ana Susmozas & Antonio D. Moreno & María Guirado & Nely Carreras & Mercedes Ballesteros, 2021. "Biogas from Anaerobic Digestion as an Energy Vector: Current Upgrading Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-30, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Piotr Banaszuk & Grzegorz Zając & Martin J. Wassen, 2023. "Grass from Road Verges as a Substrate for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Mohammad Al-Addous & Motasem N. Saidan & Mathhar Bdour & Mohammad Alnaief, 2018. "Evaluation of Biogas Production from the Co-Digestion of Municipal Food Waste and Wastewater Sludge at Refugee Camps Using an Automated Methane Potential Test System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Lübken, Manfred & Koch, Konrad & Gehring, Tito & Horn, Harald & Wichern, Marc, 2015. "Parameter estimation and long-term process simulation of a biogas reactor operated under trace elements limitation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 352-360.
    4. Łukasz Sobol & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Alessandro Suardi & Rainer Preißmann, 2021. "Analysis of the Possibility of Energetic Utilization of Biomass Obtained from Grass Mowing of a Large-Area Golf Course—A Case Study of Tuscany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Browne, James D. & Murphy, Jerry D., 2013. "Assessment of the resource associated with biomethane from food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 170-177.
    6. Feng, Kai & Wang, Qiao & Li, Huan & Zhang, Yangyang & Deng, Zhou & Liu, Jianguo & Du, Xinrui, 2020. "Effect of fermentation type regulation using alkaline addition on two-phase anaerobic digestion of food waste at different organic load rates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 385-393.
    7. Nolan, P. & Luostarinen, S. & Doyle, E.M. & O'Kiely, P., 2016. "Anaerobic digestion of perennial ryegrass prepared by cryogenic freezing versus thermal drying methods, using contrasting in vitro batch digestion systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 273-278.
    8. Gutierrez, Enrique Chan & Xia, Ao & Murphy, Jerry D., 2016. "Can slurry biogas systems be cost effective without subsidy in Mexico?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 22-30.
    9. Franco, Rúben Teixeira & Buffière, Pierre & Bayard, Rémy, 2018. "Co-ensiling of cattle manure before biogas production: Effects of fermentation stimulants and inhibitors on biomass and methane preservation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 315-323.
    10. Ó Céileachair, Dónal & O'Shea, Richard & Murphy, Jerry D. & Wall, David M., 2021. "Alternative energy management strategies for large industry in non-gas-grid regions using on-farm biomethane," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    11. Nolan, Pearl & Doyle, Evelyn M. & Grant, Jim & O'Kiely, Pádraig, 2018. "Upgrading grass biomass during ensiling with contrasting fibrolytic enzyme additives for enhanced methane production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 462-473.
    12. Yu, Liang & Ma, Jingwei & Frear, Craig & Zhao, Quanbao & Dillon, Robert & Li, Xiujin & Chen, Shulin, 2013. "Multiphase modeling of settling and suspension in anaerobic digester," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 28-39.
    13. VAN Vlierberghe, C. & Carrere, H. & Bernet, N. & Santa-Catalina, G. & Frederic, S. & Escudie, R., 2022. "Co-ensiling and field wilting investigated as preparation methods for the ensiling of a wet harvested catch crop for biomethane production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1230-1237.
    14. Zheng, Zehui & Liu, Jinhuan & Yuan, Xufeng & Wang, Xiaofen & Zhu, Wanbin & Yang, Fuyu & Cui, Zongjun, 2015. "Effect of dairy manure to switchgrass co-digestion ratio on methane production and the bacterial community in batch anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 249-257.
    15. Susanne Theuerl & Christiane Herrmann & Monika Heiermann & Philipp Grundmann & Niels Landwehr & Ulrich Kreidenweis & Annette Prochnow, 2019. "The Future Agricultural Biogas Plant in Germany: A Vision," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, January.
    16. Feng, Kai & Li, Huan & Deng, Zhou & Wang, Qiao & Zhang, Yangyang & Zheng, Chengzhi, 2020. "Effect of pre-fermentation types on the potential of methane production and energy recovery from food waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1588-1595.
    17. Villa, Raffaella & Ortega Rodriguez, Lelia & Fenech, Cecilia & Anika, Ogemdi Chinwendu, 2020. "Ensiling for anaerobic digestion: A review of key considerations to maximise methane yields," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Wu, Benteng & Lin, Richen & Bose, Archishman & Huerta, Jorge Diaz & Kang, Xihui & Deng, Chen & Murphy, Jerry D., 2023. "Economic and environmental viability of biofuel production from organic wastes: A pathway towards competitive carbon neutrality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    19. Andreas Meyer-Aurich & Yulia Lochmann & Hilde Klauss & Annette Prochnow, 2016. "Comparative Advantage of Maize- and Grass-Silage Based Feedstock for Biogas Production with Respect to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-14, June.
    20. De Meyer, Annelies & Cattrysse, Dirk & Van Orshoven, Jos, 2016. "Considering biomass growth and regeneration in the optimisation of biomass supply chains," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P2), pages 990-1002.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Co-digestion; Synergy; Silage; Slurry;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:127:y:2018:i:c:p:474-480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.