IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v101y2017icp680-689.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial and temporal variability of wind energy resource and production over the North Western Mediterranean Sea: Sensitivity to air-sea interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Omrani, Hiba
  • Drobinski, Philippe
  • Arsouze, Thomas
  • Bastin, Sophie
  • Lebeaupin-Brossier, Cindy
  • Mailler, Sylvain

Abstract

This work assesses the sensitivity of the offshore wind energy density and production to SST biases and air-sea feedbacks along the French and Spanish coast in the North-Western Mediterranean. It makes use of a set of three 20-years simulations from atmosphere stand-alone and atmosphere/ocean coupled models. In this numerical experiment, the effects of SST bias and air-sea feedbacks are isolated without any interference with other sources of error and uncertainty propagation, meaning that the same model and hence the same physics are used, all other things being equal. This study shows that the effects of SST bias or air-sea feedbacks on wind energy density and production estimation can reach up to 10% and 5%, respectively. Especially, accounting for air-sea coupled processes on sub-monthly time scales weakens systematically the energy density and production by 6.5% and 2.4% with respect to the configuration where these effects are neglected. The relative variability over the 20 years of simulation does not exceed 20% so the impact of air-sea feedbacks is very robust in time in terms of wind energy density and production assessment. Uncertainties up to 6.5 and 2.5% in the evaluation of the potential in terms of wind energy density and production potential can have severe consequences on the whole industry by lowering the projects profitability. This study shows that the effects of SST bias and air-sea feedbacks usually extend vertically up to the hub-height but their magnitude depends on the stability of the atmosphere. This study concludes that reducing the SST bias at the lower boundary of numerical atmospheric models and accounting for rapid interactions and feedbacks between the ocean and the atmosphere are key to improve the reliability of offshore wind energy density and production assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Omrani, Hiba & Drobinski, Philippe & Arsouze, Thomas & Bastin, Sophie & Lebeaupin-Brossier, Cindy & Mailler, Sylvain, 2017. "Spatial and temporal variability of wind energy resource and production over the North Western Mediterranean Sea: Sensitivity to air-sea interactions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 680-689.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:680-689
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.09.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148116308187
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2016.09.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pimenta, Felipe & Kempton, Willett & Garvine, Richard, 2008. "Combining meteorological stations and satellite data to evaluate the offshore wind power resource of Southeastern Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2375-2387.
    2. Charabi, Yassine & Al-Yahyai, Sultan & Gastli, Adel, 2011. "Evaluation of NWP performance for wind energy resource assessment in Oman," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 1545-1555, April.
    3. Al-Yahyai, Sultan & Charabi, Yassine & Gastli, Adel, 2010. "Review of the use of Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) Models for wind energy assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3192-3198, December.
    4. Al-Yahyai, Sultan & Charabi, Yassine & Al-Badi, Abdullah & Gastli, Adel, 2012. "Nested ensemble NWP approach for wind energy assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 150-160.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kazak, Jan & van Hoof, Joost & Szewranski, Szymon, 2017. "Challenges in the wind turbines location process in Central Europe – The use of spatial decision support systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 425-433.
    2. Florin Onea & Eugen Rusu, 2018. "Sustainability of the Reanalysis Databases in Predicting the Wind and Wave Power along the European Coasts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Eugen Rusu & Florin Onea, 2017. "Joint Evaluation of the Wave and Offshore Wind Energy Resources in the Developing Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Luzia, Graziela & Koivisto, Matti J. & Hahmann, Andrea N., 2023. "Validating EURO-CORDEX climate simulations for modelling European wind power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    5. Nagababu, Garlapati & Srinivas, Bhasuru Abhinaya & Kachhwaha, Surendra Singh & Puppala, Harish & Kumar, Surisetty V.V.Arun, 2023. "Can offshore wind energy help to attain carbon neutrality amid climate change? A GIS-MCDM based analysis to unravel the facts using CORDEX-SA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    6. Alexis Tantet & Marc Stéfanon & Philippe Drobinski & Jordi Badosa & Silvia Concettini & Anna Cretì & Claudia D’Ambrosio & Dimitri Thomopulos & Peter Tankov, 2019. "e 4 clim 1.0: The Energy for a Climate Integrated Model: Description and Application to Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-37, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salvação, Nadia & Bentamy, Abderrahim & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Developing a new wind dataset by blending satellite data and WRF model wind predictions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 283-295.
    2. Xsitaaz T. Chadee & Naresh R. Seegobin & Ricardo M. Clarke, 2017. "Optimizing the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model for Mapping the Near-Surface Wind Resources over the Southernmost Caribbean Islands of Trinidad and Tobago," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Nor, Khalid Mohamed & Shaaban, Mohamed & Abdul Rahman, Hasimah, 2014. "Feasibility assessment of wind energy resources in Malaysia based on NWP models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 147-154.
    4. Al-Badi, A.H. & Malik, A. & Gastli, A., 2011. "Sustainable energy usage in Oman—Opportunities and barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3780-3788.
    5. Murthy, K.S.R. & Rahi, O.P., 2017. "A comprehensive review of wind resource assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1320-1342.
    6. Amer Al-Hinai & Yassine Charabi & Seyed H. Aghay Kaboli, 2021. "Offshore Wind Energy Resource Assessment across the Territory of Oman: A Spatial-Temporal Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Al-Yahyai, Sultan & Charabi, Yassine, 2015. "Assessment of large-scale wind energy potential in the emerging city of Duqm (Oman)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 438-447.
    8. Yip, Chak Man Andrew & Gunturu, Udaya Bhaskar & Stenchikov, Georgiy L., 2016. "Wind resource characterization in the Arabian Peninsula," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 826-836.
    9. He, J.Y. & Chan, P.W. & Li, Q.S. & Tong, H.W., 2023. "Mapping future offshore wind resources in the South China Sea under climate change by regional climate modeling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Al-Hadhrami, L.M., 2013. "Comprehensive review of cooling and heating degree days characteristics over Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 305-314.
    11. Charabi, Yassine & Gastli, Adel, 2013. "Integration of temperature and dust effects in siting large PV power plant in hot arid area," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 635-644.
    12. Yiqi Chu & Chengcai Li & Yefang Wang & Jing Li & Jian Li, 2016. "A Long-Term Wind Speed Ensemble Forecasting System with Weather Adapted Correction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Al-Yahyai, Sultan & Charabi, Yassine & Al-Badi, Abdullah & Gastli, Adel, 2012. "Nested ensemble NWP approach for wind energy assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 150-160.
    14. Islam, M.R. & Saidur, R. & Rahim, N.A., 2011. "Assessment of wind energy potentiality at Kudat and Labuan, Malaysia using Weibull distribution function," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 985-992.
    15. Italo Fernandes & Felipe M. Pimenta & Osvaldo R. Saavedra & Arcilan T. Assireu, 2022. "Exploring the Complementarity of Offshore Wind Sites to Reduce the Seasonal Variability of Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    16. Soukissian, Takvor H. & Papadopoulos, Anastasios, 2015. "Effects of different wind data sources in offshore wind power assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 101-114.
    17. Dhunny, A.Z. & Timmons, D.S. & Allam, Z. & Lollchund, M.R. & Cunden, T.S.M., 2020. "An economic assessment of near-shore wind farm development using a weather research forecast-based genetic algorithm model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    18. Zhang, Yagang & Zhang, Jinghui & Yu, Leyi & Pan, Zhiya & Feng, Changyou & Sun, Yiqian & Wang, Fei, 2022. "A short-term wind energy hybrid optimal prediction system with denoising and novel error correction technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    19. Lima, Danielle K.S. & Leão, Ruth P.S. & dos Santos, Antônio C.S. & de Melo, Francisca D.C. & Couto, Vinícius M. & de Noronha, Aurélio W.T. & Oliveira, Demercil S., 2015. "Estimating the offshore wind resources of the State of Ceará in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 203-221.
    20. Veronesi, F. & Grassi, S. & Raubal, M., 2016. "Statistical learning approach for wind resource assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 836-850.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:680-689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.