IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v94y2009i1p44-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of maintenance policy using the proportional hazard model

Author

Listed:
  • Samrout, M.
  • Châtelet, E.
  • Kouta, R.
  • Chebbo, N.

Abstract

The evolution of system reliability depends on its structure as well as on the evolution of its components reliability. The latter is a function of component age during a system's operating life. Component aging is strongly affected by maintenance activities performed on the system. In this work, we consider two categories of maintenance activities: corrective maintenance (CM) and preventive maintenance (PM). Maintenance actions are characterized by their ability to reduce this age. PM consists of actions applied on components while they are operating, whereas CM actions occur when the component breaks down. In this paper, we expound a new method to integrate the effect of CM while planning for the PM policy. The proportional hazard function was used as a modeling tool for that purpose. Interesting results were obtained when comparison between policies that take into consideration the CM effect and those that do not is established.

Suggested Citation

  • Samrout, M. & Châtelet, E. & Kouta, R. & Chebbo, N., 2009. "Optimization of maintenance policy using the proportional hazard model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 44-52.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:94:y:2009:i:1:p:44-52
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.12.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832007002724
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2007.12.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    2. Lapa, Celso Marcelo F. & Pereira, Cláudio Márcio N.A. & de Barros, Márcio Paes, 2006. "A model for preventive maintenance planning by genetic algorithms based in cost and reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 233-240.
    3. DEDOPOULOS, Illias & SMEERS, Yves, 1998. "An age reduction appraoch for finite horizon optimization of preventive maintenance for single units subject to random failures," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1318, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Gregory Levitin, 2005. "The Universal Generating Function in Reliability Analysis and Optimization," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84628-245-4, April.
    5. Percy, David F. & Kobbacy, Khairy A. H., 2000. "Determining economical maintenance intervals," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 87-94, August.
    6. Cho, Danny I. & Parlar, Mahmut, 1991. "A survey of maintenance models for multi-unit systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Kumar, Dhananjay & Westberg, Ulf, 1997. "Maintenance scheduling under age replacement policy using proportional hazards model and TTT-plotting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 507-515, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiang, Yisha, 2013. "Joint optimization of X¯ control chart and preventive maintenance policies: A discrete-time Markov chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 382-390.
    2. Gao, Xueli & Barabady, Javad & Markeset, Tore, 2010. "An approach for prediction of petroleum production facility performance considering Arctic influence factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 837-846.
    3. Zhou, Yifan & Zhang, Zhisheng & Lin, Tian Ran & Ma, Lin, 2013. "Maintenance optimisation of a multi-state series–parallel system considering economic dependence and state-dependent inspection intervals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 248-259.
    4. Shafiee, Mahmood & Finkelstein, Maxim & Chukova, Stefanka, 2011. "On optimal upgrade level for used products under given cost structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 286-291.
    5. Ágota Bányai, 2021. "Energy Consumption-Based Maintenance Policy Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-33, September.
    6. Liu, Bin & Xu, Zhengguo & Xie, Min & Kuo, Way, 2014. "A value-based preventive maintenance policy for multi-component system with continuously degrading components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 83-89.
    7. Braglia, Marcello & Carmignani, Gionata & Frosolini, Marco & Zammori, Francesco, 2012. "Data classification and MTBF prediction with a multivariate analysis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 27-35.
    8. Kosztyán, Zsolt T. & Pribojszki-Németh, Anikó & Szalkai, István, 2019. "Hybrid multimode resource-constrained maintenance project scheduling problem," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    9. Zhang, Nan & Fouladirad, Mitra & Barros, Anne, 2019. "Reliability-based measures and prognostic analysis of a K-out-of-N system in a random environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 1120-1131.
    10. Briš, Radim & Byczanski, Petr, 2013. "Effective computing algorithm for maintenance optimization of highly reliable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 77-85.
    11. Bobrowski, Sebastian & Chen, Hong & Döring, Maik & Jensen, Uwe & Schinköthe, Wolfgang, 2015. "Estimation of the lifetime distribution of mechatronic systems in the presence of a covariate: A comparison among parametric, semiparametric and nonparametric models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 105-112.
    12. Shuyuan Gan & Bolun Wang & Zhifang Song, 2021. "A Combined Maintenance Strategy Considering Spares, Buffer, and Quality," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(3), pages 431-445, June.
    13. XiaoFei, Lu & Min, Liu, 2014. "Hazard rate function in dynamic environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 50-60.
    14. Briš, Radim & Byczanski, Petr & Goňo, Radomír & Rusek, Stanislav, 2017. "Discrete maintenance optimization of complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 80-89.
    15. P-E Labeau & M-C Segovia, 2011. "Effective age models for imperfect maintenance," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 117-130, June.
    16. Chrianna I Bharat & Kevin Murray & Edward Cripps & Melinda R Hodkiewicz, 2018. "Methods for displaying and calibration of Cox proportional hazards models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(1), pages 105-115, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad Doostparast & Farhad Kolahan & Mahdi Doostparast, 2015. "Optimisation of PM scheduling for multi-component systems – a simulated annealing approach," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(7), pages 1199-1207, May.
    2. Gao, Yicong & Feng, Yixiong & Zhang, Zixian & Tan, Jianrong, 2015. "An optimal dynamic interval preventive maintenance scheduling for series systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 19-30.
    3. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2011. "Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Xiang, Yisha, 2013. "Joint optimization of X¯ control chart and preventive maintenance policies: A discrete-time Markov chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 382-390.
    5. Seyed Habib A. Rahmati & Abbas Ahmadi & Kannan Govindan, 2018. "A novel integrated condition-based maintenance and stochastic flexible job shop scheduling problem: simulation-based optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 583-621, October.
    6. Min-Tsai Lai, 2007. "Periodical Replacement Model for a Multi-Unit System Subject to Failure Rate Interaction," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 401-411, June.
    7. Dilaver, Halit Metehan & Akçay, Alp & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2023. "Integrated planning of asset-use and dry-docking for a fleet of maritime assets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    8. Briš, Radim & Byczanski, Petr & Goňo, Radomír & Rusek, Stanislav, 2017. "Discrete maintenance optimization of complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 80-89.
    9. Jyrki Savolainen & Michele Urbani, 2021. "Maintenance optimization for a multi-unit system with digital twin simulation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1953-1973, October.
    10. Do, Phuc & Vu, Hai Canh & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2015. "Maintenance grouping for multi-component systems with availability constraints and limited maintenance teams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 56-67.
    11. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    12. Wang, Wenbin & Syntetos, Aris A., 2011. "Spare parts demand: Linking forecasting to equipment maintenance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1194-1209.
    13. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2019. "Scheduling of imperfect inspections for reliability critical systems with shock-driven defects and delayed failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 89-98.
    14. Bouvard, K. & Artus, S. & Bérenguer, C. & Cocquempot, V., 2011. "Condition-based dynamic maintenance operations planning & grouping. Application to commercial heavy vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 601-610.
    15. Wang, Wenbin, 2011. "An inspection model based on a three-stage failure process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 838-848.
    16. Lust, T. & Roux, O. & Riane, F., 2009. "Exact and heuristic methods for the selective maintenance problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(3), pages 1166-1177, September.
    17. Robin P. Nicolai & Rommert Dekker, 2008. "Optimal Maintenance of Multi-component Systems: A Review," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, chapter 11, pages 263-286, Springer.
    18. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-178.
    19. Karamatsoukis, C.C. & Kyriakidis, E.G., 2010. "Optimal maintenance of two stochastically deteriorating machines with an intermediate buffer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 297-308, November.
    20. Zhang, Xiaohong & Zeng, Jianchao, 2017. "Joint optimization of condition-based opportunistic maintenance and spare parts provisioning policy in multiunit systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 479-498.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:94:y:2009:i:1:p:44-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.