IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v250y2024ics0951832024002825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A reliability index to measure multi-state flow network considering capacity restoration level and maintenance cost

Author

Listed:
  • Niu, Yi-Feng
  • Zhou, Run-Hui
  • Xu, Xiu-Zhen
  • Xiang, Hai-Yan

Abstract

In this study, every edge of a multi-state flow network (MFN), in addition to multiple capacities, are endowed with a maintenance cost. The existing studies measure the maintenance cost integrated reliability index of an MFN with an assumption that all edges are maintained to restore the network from a degraded state to the largest state, and in contrast, this study takes one step further to consider a more general case that the network is restored from a degraded state to an expected state (including but not limited to the largest state). This study proposes a method to simultaneously evaluate the index MR(d,D,T), defined as the probability that a network can be restored from a degraded state of capacity level below d to an expected state of capacity level not less than D and the maintenance cost is within a limit T, and the index URd defined as the probability that network is in a degraded state. The maintenance cost integrated reliability R(d,D,T) is then calculated, which is the ratio of MR(d,D,T) to URd denoting the ability of an MFN to restore from a failure state to an expected state under the limited maintenance cost. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the reliability index R(d,D,T).

Suggested Citation

  • Niu, Yi-Feng & Zhou, Run-Hui & Xu, Xiu-Zhen & Xiang, Hai-Yan, 2024. "A reliability index to measure multi-state flow network considering capacity restoration level and maintenance cost," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024002825
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024002825
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024002825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.