IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v249y2024ics0951832024002758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framework for process risk analysis of maritime accidents based on resilience theory: A case study of grounding accidents in Arctic waters

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Yuerong
  • Liu, Kezhong
  • Fu, Shanshan
  • Chen, Jihong

Abstract

The complexity and non-linear interactions involved in maritime accidents make it challenging to apply traditional models of risk analysis to them. Resilience is adopting a perspective focuses on holistic aspects of safety across the pre-accident, mid-accident, and post-accident phases. This paper proposes a framework for process risk analysis of maritime accidents based on resilience theory by applying the function resonance analysis method (FRAM). We first identify a three-layer maritime accident based on maritime accident investigation reports and then analyze the potential variability of all relevant functions. Subsequently, a FRAM model is constructed to analyze the accident's functional resonance of accidents by aggregating variations in the functions. Finally, we apply Monte Carlo simulations to compute the values of coupling of all interconnected functions. The ship grounding accidents in Arctic waters is chosen as the case to demonstrate the proposed framework. The relationships of influence between the functions were analyzed to obtain critical coupling pathways of coupling between them, and a time-weighted PageRank algorithm was used to identify key functions. The results show that the proposed approach can reveal vulnerabilities and instabilities in the system, and enables the proposal of targeted, long-term measures of risk control to enhance its resilience and safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Yuerong & Liu, Kezhong & Fu, Shanshan & Chen, Jihong, 2024. "Framework for process risk analysis of maritime accidents based on resilience theory: A case study of grounding accidents in Arctic waters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:249:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024002758
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024002758
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:249:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024002758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.