IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v215y2021ics0951832021004312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive local kernels formulation of mutual information with application to active post-seismic building damage inference

Author

Listed:
  • Sheibani, Mohamadreza
  • Ou, Ge

Abstract

The abundance of training data is not guaranteed in various supervised learning applications. One of these situations is the post-earthquake regional damage assessment of buildings. Querying the damage label of each building requires a thorough inspection by experts, and thus, is an expensive task. A practical approach is to sample the most informative buildings in a sequential learning scheme. Active learning methods recommend the most informative cases that are able to maximally reduce the generalization error. The information-theoretic measure of mutual information (MI), which maximizes the expected information gain over the input domain, can be used for informative sampling of a dataset in a pool-based scenario. However, the computational complexity of the standard MI algorithm prevents the utilization of this method on large datasets. A local kernels strategy was proposed to reduce the computational costs, but the adaptability of the kernels to the observed labels was not considered in the original formulation of this strategy. In this article, an adaptive local kernels methodology is developed that enables the conformability of the kernels to the observed output data while enhancing the computational complexity of the standard MI algorithm. The proposed algorithm is developed to work with a Gaussian process regression (GPR) method, where the kernel hyperparameters are updated after each label query using maximum likelihood estimation. In the sequential learning procedure, the updated hyperparameters can be used in the MI kernel matrices to improve the sample suggestion performance. The advantages of the proposed method are demonstrated in a simulation of the 2018 Anchorage, AK, earthquake. It is shown that while the proposed algorithm enables GPR to reach acceptable performance using fewer training data, the computational demand remains lower than the standard local kernels strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheibani, Mohamadreza & Ou, Ge, 2021. "Adaptive local kernels formulation of mutual information with application to active post-seismic building damage inference," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:215:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021004312
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021004312
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107915?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuan, Kai & Xiao, Ning-Cong & Wang, Zhonglai & Shang, Kun, 2020. "System reliability analysis by combining structure function and active learning kriging model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Xiao, Mi & Zhang, Jinhao & Gao, Liang, 2020. "A system active learning Kriging method for system reliability-based design optimization with a multiple response model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Zhang, Xufang & Wang, Lei & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2019. "REIF: A novel active-learning function toward adaptive Kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 440-454.
    4. Sadoughi, Mohammadkazem & Li, Meng & Hu, Chao, 2018. "Multivariate system reliability analysis considering highly nonlinear and dependent safety events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 189-200.
    5. Li, Meng & Sadoughi, Mohammadkazem & Hu, Zhen & Hu, Chao, 2020. "A hybrid Gaussian process model for system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bodenmann, Lukas & Reuland, Yves & Stojadinović, Božidar, 2023. "Dynamic post-earthquake updating of regional damage estimates using Gaussian Processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Seonghyeok & Lee, Mingyu & Lee, Ikjin, 2023. "A new sampling approach for system reliability-based design optimization under multiple simulation models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Yang, Seonghyeok & Jo, Hwisang & Lee, Kyungeun & Lee, Ikjin, 2022. "Expected system improvement (ESI): A new learning function for system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    3. Zhang, Jinhao & Gao, Liang & Xiao, Mi, 2020. "A composite-projection-outline-based approximation method for system reliability analysis with hybrid uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    4. Huang, Shi-Ya & Zhang, Shao-He & Liu, Lei-Lei, 2022. "A new active learning Kriging metamodel for structural system reliability analysis with multiple failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Wang, Jian & Sun, Zhili & Cao, Runan, 2021. "An efficient and robust Kriging-based method for system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    6. Xiao, Ning-Cong & Yuan, Kai & Zhan, Hongyou, 2022. "System reliability analysis based on dependent Kriging predictions and parallel learning strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    7. Xiao, Mi & Zhang, Jinhao & Gao, Liang, 2020. "A system active learning Kriging method for system reliability-based design optimization with a multiple response model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Chang, Miaoxin & Huang, Xianzhen & Coolen, Frank PA & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2023. "New reliability model for complex systems based on stochastic processes and survival signature," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1349-1364.
    9. Li, Luxin & Chen, Guohai & Fang, Mingxuan & Yang, Dixiong, 2021. "Reliability analysis of structures with multimodal distributions based on direct probability integral method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Wang, Yuhao & Gao, Yi & Liu, Yongming & Ghosh, Sayan & Subber, Waad & Pandita, Piyush & Wang, Liping, 2021. "Bayesian-entropy gaussian process for constrained metamodeling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    11. Liu, Yushan & Li, Luyi & Zhao, Sihan & Song, Shufang, 2021. "A global surrogate model technique based on principal component analysis and Kriging for uncertainty propagation of dynamic systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    12. Li, Peiping & Wang, Yu, 2022. "An active learning reliability analysis method using adaptive Bayesian compressive sensing and Monte Carlo simulation (ABCS-MCS)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    13. Ni, Pinghe & Li, Jun & Hao, Hong & Yan, Weimin & Du, Xiuli & Zhou, Hongyuan, 2020. "Reliability analysis and design optimization of nonlinear structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    14. Moustapha, Maliki & Parisi, Pietro & Marelli, Stefano & Sudret, Bruno, 2024. "Reliability analysis of arbitrary systems based on active learning and global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    15. Xu, Yanwen & Renteria, Anabel & Wang, Pingfeng, 2022. "Adaptive surrogate models with partially observed information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    16. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Gao, Liang & Wang, Dapeng & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming, 2020. "EEK-SYS: System reliability analysis through estimation error-guided adaptive Kriging approximation of multiple limit state surfaces," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    17. Teixeira, Rui & Martinez-Pastor, Beatriz & Nogal, Maria & O’Connor, Alan, 2021. "Reliability analysis using a multi-metamodel complement-basis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    18. Qian, Hua-Ming & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2021. "Time-variant system reliability analysis method for a small failure probability problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    19. Zhou, Yicheng & Lu, Zhenzhou & Yun, Wanying, 2020. "Active sparse polynomial chaos expansion for system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    20. Xiao, Mi & Zhang, Jinhao & Gao, Liang, 2021. "A Kriging-assisted sampling method for reliability analysis of structures with hybrid uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:215:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021004312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.