IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v210y2021ics0951832021001162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability of bridges to individual and multiple hazards- floods and earthquakes

Author

Listed:
  • Argyroudis, Sotirios A.
  • Mitoulis, Stergios Aristoteles

Abstract

Building resilient bridges, that are able to withstand multiple natural stressors with minimal damage and quickly restore their functionality is paramount to delivering climate-resilient transport infrastructure. Nevertheless, bridges are proven to be vulnerable to natural hazards, with floods and earthquakes being the main causes of failure. The available research and practice for assessing the vulnerability of river-crossing bridges is predominantly qualitative and therefore relies heavily on visual inspections, while ignoring important characteristics of the complex water-soil-bridge interaction. This is a knowledge gap that this paper aims to fill. This work provides novel fragility models for hydraulically induced stressors and/or combinations of hydraulic and seismic hazards. To achieve this, unique detailed two- and three- dimensional numerical models are employed, for a typical three-span prestressed box-girder river-crossing bridge. This paper is a primer on the vulnerability of flood-critical bridges as it models the entire water-soil-bridge system, taking into account critical hydraulic stressors (scour, debris accumulation, hydraulic forces), the uncertainty in scour hole formation, and all components of integral and isolated bridges: deck, bearings, piers and abutments, backfill, and the foundation soil. A detailed description of the damage modes for each component is given and sets of fragility curves for floods and combinations of hydraulic stressors and earthquakes are developed. The study concludes that integral bridges are in most cases more vulnerable to local scour than bridges with bearings, since the latter are more flexible and can therefore adapt to changes in their geometry. The opposite is true for global scour and/or seismic earthquake excitations. The generated fragility models are useful tools for quantitative risk assessment of transport systems and provide practical means in resilience-based asset management by owners and operators of transport infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Argyroudis, Sotirios A. & Mitoulis, Stergios Aristoteles, 2021. "Vulnerability of bridges to individual and multiple hazards- floods and earthquakes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:210:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021001162
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021001162
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107564?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nofal, Omar M. & van de Lindt, John W. & Do, Trung Q., 2020. "Multi-variate and single-variable flood fragility and loss approaches for buildings," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Shekhar, Shivang & Ghosh, Jayadipta, 2020. "A metamodeling based seismic life-cycle cost assessment framework for highway bridge structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Bilal M. Ayyub, 2014. "Systems Resilience for Multihazard Environments: Definition, Metrics, and Valuation for Decision Making," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 340-355, February.
    4. Liu, Wei & Song, Zhaoyang, 2020. "Review of studies on the resilience of urban critical infrastructure networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. E. E. Koks & J. Rozenberg & C. Zorn & M. Tariverdi & M. Vousdoukas & S. A. Fraser & J. W. Hall & S. Hallegatte, 2019. "A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Ghosh, Jayadipta & Sood, Piyush, 2016. "Consideration of time-evolving capacity distributions and improved degradation models for seismic fragility assessment of aging highway bridges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 197-218.
    7. Woods, David D., 2015. "Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 5-9.
    8. Rob Lamb & Paige Garside & Raghav Pant & Jim W. Hall, 2019. "A Probabilistic Model of the Economic Risk to Britain's Railway Network from Bridge Scour During Floods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(11), pages 2457-2478, November.
    9. Michalis I. Vousdoukas & Lorenzo Mentaschi & Evangelos Voukouvalas & Martin Verlaan & Svetlana Jevrejeva & Luke P. Jackson & Luc Feyen, 2018. "Global probabilistic projections of extreme sea levels show intensification of coastal flood hazard," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Argyroudis, Sotirios A. & Mitoulis, Stergios Α. & Winter, Mike G. & Kaynia, Amir M., 2019. "Fragility of transport assets exposed to multiple hazards: State-of-the-art review toward infrastructural resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Jingyi & Yu, Yang & Cheng, Siyuan & Li, Zhenmian & Yu, Jianxing, 2022. "Probabilistic multilevel robustness assessment framework for a TLP under mooring failure considering uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    2. Oluwatuyi, Opeyemi E. & Ng, Kam & Wulff, Shaun S., 2023. "Improved resistance prediction and reliability for bridge pile foundation in shales through optimal site investigation plans," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Wu, Jingyi & Yu, Yang & Jin, Zihang & Zhang, Wenhao, 2024. "Multi-dimensional resilience assessment framework of offshore structure under mooring failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Marroni, Giulia & Casini, Leonardo & Bartolucci, Andrea & Kuipers, Sanneke & Casson Moreno, Valeria & Landucci, Gabriele, 2024. "Development of fragility models for process equipment affected by physical security attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Li, Chao & Diao, Yucheng & Li, Hong-Nan & Pan, Haiyang & Ma, Ruisheng & Han, Qiang & Xing, Yihan, 2023. "Seismic performance assessment of a sea-crossing cable-stayed bridge system considering soil spatial variability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    6. Fahad, Md Golam Rabbani & Nazari, Rouzbeh & Motamedi, M.H. & Karimi, Maryam, 2022. "A Decision-Making Framework Integrating Fluid and Solid Systems to Assess Resilience of Coastal Communities Experiencing Extreme Storm Events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    7. Jeongmin Lee & Jungkyu Ahn, 2023. "Analysis of Bed Sorting Methods for One Dimensional Sediment Transport Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Du, Ao & Wang, Xiaowei & Xie, Yazhou & Dong, You, 2023. "Regional seismic risk and resilience assessment: Methodological development, applicability, and future research needs – An earthquake engineering perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Liu, Huan & Tatano, Hirokazu & Pflug, Georg & Hochrainer-Stigler, Stefan, 2021. "Post-disaster recovery in industrial sectors: A Markov process analysis of multiple lifeline disruptions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    3. Das, Laya & Munikoti, Sai & Natarajan, Balasubramaniam & Srinivasan, Babji, 2020. "Measuring smart grid resilience: Methods, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    4. Maruyama Rentschler,Jun Erik & Avner,Paolo & Marconcini,Mattia & Su,Rui & Strano,Emanuele & Bernard,Louise Alice Karine & Riom,Capucine Anne Veronique & Hallegatte,Stephane, 2022. "Rapid Urban Growth in Flood Zones : Global Evidence since 1985," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10014, The World Bank.
    5. Caputo, A.C. & Donati, L. & Salini, P., 2023. "Estimating resilience of manufacturing plants to physical disruptions: Model and application," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    6. Cassottana, Beatrice & Shen, Lijuan & Tang, Loon Ching, 2019. "Modeling the recovery process: A key dimension of resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Ahmad Mohamad El-Maissi & Sotirios A. Argyroudis & Fadzli Mohamed Nazri, 2020. "Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methodologies for Roadway Assets and Networks: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-31, December.
    8. Uday, Payuna & Chandrahasa, Rakshit & Marais, Karen, 2019. "System Importance Measures: Definitions and Application to System-of-Systems Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Paul, Shuva & Poudyal, Abodh & Poudel, Shiva & Dubey, Anamika & Wang, Zhaoyu, 2024. "Resilience assessment and planning in power distribution systems: Past and future considerations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    10. Wang, Jian & Gao, Shibin & Yu, Long & Zhang, Dongkai & Xie, Chenlin & Chen, Ke & Kou, Lei, 2023. "Data-driven lightning-related failure risk prediction of overhead contact lines based on Bayesian network with spatiotemporal fragility model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    11. Xu, Zizhen & Chopra, Shauhrat S., 2022. "Network-based Assessment of Metro Infrastructure with a Spatial–temporal Resilience Cycle Framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    12. Gangwal, Utkarsh & Dong, Shangjia, 2022. "Critical facility accessibility rapid failure early-warning detection and redundancy mapping in urban flooding," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    13. Zhang, Zhenyu & Ji, Tingting & Wei, Hsi-Hsien, 2022. "Dynamic emergency inspection routing and restoration scheduling to enhance the post-earthquake resilience of a highway–bridge network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    14. Pugliese, F. & De Risi, R. & Sarno, L. Di, 2022. "Reliability assessment of existing RC bridges with spatially-variable pitting corrosion subjected to increasing traffic demand," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    15. Li, Chao & Diao, Yucheng & Li, Hong-Nan & Pan, Haiyang & Ma, Ruisheng & Han, Qiang & Xing, Yihan, 2023. "Seismic performance assessment of a sea-crossing cable-stayed bridge system considering soil spatial variability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    16. Poulin, Craig & Kane, Michael B., 2021. "Infrastructure resilience curves: Performance measures and summary metrics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Kenneth Martínez & David Claudio, 2023. "Expanding Fundamental Boundaries between Resilience and Survivability in Systems Engineering: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    18. Dui, Hongyan & Zheng, Xiaoqian & Wu, Shaomin, 2021. "Resilience analysis of maritime transportation systems based on importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    19. Weihua Zhu & Kai Liu & Ming Wang & Sadhana Nirandjan & Elco E. Koks, 2023. "Improved assessment of rainfall-induced railway infrastructure risk in China using empirical data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1525-1548, January.
    20. Argyroudis, Sotirios A. & Mitoulis, Stergios Α. & Winter, Mike G. & Kaynia, Amir M., 2019. "Fragility of transport assets exposed to multiple hazards: State-of-the-art review toward infrastructural resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:210:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021001162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.