IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v196y2020ics0951832019301073.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the vulnerability of infrastructure networks based on distribution measures

Author

Listed:
  • Galvan, Giulio
  • Agarwal, Jitendra

Abstract

Infrastructure networks enable communities to be resilient by distributing essential services and supporting the relief and recovery actions necessary to bounce back from disruptive events. In order for infrastructures to play this central role, their own vulnerability needs to be assessed and managed. In this paper, a new distributional metric for vulnerability assessment is presented. Unlike existing methodologies, it aims at producing a characterisation of infrastructure vulnerability which accounts in full for the variability of the service delivery performance across disruption scenarios. The applications of the metric to theoretical configurations as well as real infrastructure networks are exemplified. These examples demonstrate that the proposed metric enables transparent and comprehensive information on the vulnerability of infrastructure networks. It is noted that the use of average values of system performance under different disruption scenarios may lead to unsafe conclusions about the system vulnerability. The proposed approach is also able to quantify the uncertainty in the vulnerability assessment of high-order scenarios. The paper also shows how the formalisation of the building blocks of vulnerability analysis made here, unifies many of the other methodologies found in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Galvan, Giulio & Agarwal, Jitendra, 2020. "Assessing the vulnerability of infrastructure networks based on distribution measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:196:y:2020:i:c:s0951832019301073
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832019301073
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johansson, Jonas & Hassel, Henrik & Zio, Enrico, 2013. "Reliability and vulnerability analyses of critical infrastructures: Comparing two approaches in the context of power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 27-38.
    2. J. Lorenz & S. Battiston & F. Schweitzer, 2009. "Systemic risk in a unifying framework for cascading processes on networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 71(4), pages 441-460, October.
    3. Shuang, Qing & Zhang, Mingyuan & Yuan, Yongbo, 2014. "Node vulnerability of water distribution networks under cascading failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 132-141.
    4. Hong, Liu & Ouyang, Min & Peeta, Srinivas & He, Xiaozheng & Yan, Yongze, 2015. "Vulnerability assessment and mitigation for the Chinese railway system under floods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 58-68.
    5. Alan T. Murray & Timothy C. Matisziw & Tony H. Grubesic, 2008. "A Methodological Overview of Network Vulnerability Analysis," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 573-592, December.
    6. Praks, Pavel & Kopustinskas, Vytis & Masera, Marcelo, 2015. "Probabilistic modelling of security of supply in gas networks and evaluation of new infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 254-264.
    7. Su, Huai & Zio, Enrico & Zhang, Jinjun & Li, Xueyi, 2018. "A systematic framework of vulnerability analysis of a natural gas pipeline network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 79-91.
    8. Johansson, Jonas & Hassel, Henrik, 2010. "An approach for modelling interdependent infrastructures in the context of vulnerability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(12), pages 1335-1344.
    9. Ouyang, Min, 2016. "Critical location identification and vulnerability analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems under spatially localized attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 106-116.
    10. Réka Albert & Hawoong Jeong & Albert-László Barabási, 2000. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6794), pages 378-382, July.
    11. César Calderón & Enrique Moral‐Benito & Luis Servén, 2015. "Is infrastructure capital productive? A dynamic heterogeneous approach," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 177-198, March.
    12. Yiping Fang & Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio, 2015. "Optimization of Cascade‐Resilient Electrical Infrastructures and its Validation by Power Flow Modeling," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 594-607, April.
    13. Ouyang, Min & Zhao, Lijing & Hong, Liu & Pan, Zhezhe, 2014. "Comparisons of complex network based models and real train flow model to analyze Chinese railway vulnerability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 38-46.
    14. Ouyang, Min, 2014. "Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 43-60.
    15. Enrico Zio & Giovanni Sansavini, 2011. "Component Criticality in Failure Cascade Processes of Network Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(8), pages 1196-1210, August.
    16. Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-150.
    17. Thacker, Scott & Pant, Raghav & Hall, Jim W., 2017. "System-of-systems formulation and disruption analysis for multi-scale critical national infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 30-41.
    18. Crucitti, Paolo & Latora, Vito & Marchiori, Massimo & Rapisarda, Andrea, 2003. "Efficiency of scale-free networks: error and attack tolerance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 622-642.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Jason & Baker, Jack W., 2020. "Statistical learning techniques for the estimation of lifeline network performance and retrofit selection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Wang, Ke & Liu, Jinfeng & Tian, Lai & Tan, Xianfeng & Peng, Guansheng & Qin, Tianwen & Wu, Jun, 2022. "Analyzing vulnerability of optical fiber network considering recoverability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Wang, Longjian & Zhang, Shuichao & Szűcs, Gábor & Wang, Yonggang, 2024. "Identifying the critical nodes in multi-modal transportation network with a traffic demand-based computational method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chao Fang & Piao Dong & Yi-Ping Fang & Enrico Zio, 2020. "Vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructure under disruptions: An application to China Railway High-speed," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 235-245, April.
    2. Linn Svegrup & Jonas Johansson & Henrik Hassel, 2019. "Integration of Critical Infrastructure and Societal Consequence Models: Impact on Swedish Power System Mitigation Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1970-1996, September.
    3. Zhao, Chen & Li, Nan & Fang, Dongping, 2018. "Criticality assessment of urban interdependent lifeline systems using a biased PageRank algorithm and a multilayer weighted directed network model," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 100-112.
    4. Yi‐Ping Fang & Giovanni Sansavini & Enrico Zio, 2019. "An Optimization‐Based Framework for the Identification of Vulnerabilities in Electric Power Grids Exposed to Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1949-1969, September.
    5. Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-150.
    6. Su, Huai & Zhang, Jinjun & Zio, Enrico & Yang, Nan & Li, Xueyi & Zhang, Zongjie, 2018. "An integrated systemic method for supply reliability assessment of natural gas pipeline networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 489-501.
    7. Bellè, Andrea & Zeng, Zhiguo & Duval, Carole & Sango, Marc & Barros, Anne, 2022. "Modeling and vulnerability analysis of interdependent railway and power networks: Application to British test systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Senderov, S.M. & Vorobev, S.V., 2020. "Approaches to the identification of critical facilities and critical combinations of facilities in the gas industry in terms of its operability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    9. Corrado lo Storto, 2019. "An SNA-DEA Prioritization Framework to Identify Critical Nodes of Gas Networks: The Case of the US Interstate Gas Infrastructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Goldbeck, Nils & Angeloudis, Panagiotis & Ochieng, Washington Y., 2019. "Resilience assessment for interdependent urban infrastructure systems using dynamic network flow models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 62-79.
    11. Abedi, Amin & Gaudard, Ludovic & Romerio, Franco, 2019. "Review of major approaches to analyze vulnerability in power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 153-172.
    12. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2019. "Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    13. Senderov, Sergey M. & Smirnova, Elena M. & Vorobev, Sergey V., 2020. "Analysis of vulnerability of fuel supply systems in gas-consuming regions due to failure of critical gas industry facilities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    14. Wang, WuChang & Zhang, Yi & Li, YuXing & Hu, Qihui & Liu, Chengsong & Liu, Cuiwei, 2022. "Vulnerability analysis method based on risk assessment for gas transmission capabilities of natural gas pipeline networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    15. Kashin Sugishita & Yasuo Asakura, 2021. "Vulnerability studies in the fields of transportation and complex networks: a citation network analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, March.
    16. Ouyang, Min & Pan, ZheZhe & Hong, Liu & He, Yue, 2015. "Vulnerability analysis of complementary transportation systems with applications to railway and airline systems in China," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 248-257.
    17. Jingjing Kong & Slobodan P. Simonovic, 2019. "Probabilistic Multiple Hazard Resilience Model of an Interdependent Infrastructure System," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(8), pages 1843-1863, August.
    18. Vasylius, Virginijus & Jonaitis, Audrius & Gudžius, Saulius & Kopustinskas, Vytis, 2021. "Multi-period optimal power flow for identification of critical elements in a country scale high voltage power grid," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    19. Wang, Weiping & Yang, Saini & Hu, Fuyu & Stanley, H. Eugene & He, Shuai & Shi, Mimi, 2018. "An approach for cascading effects within critical infrastructure systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 164-177.
    20. Wang, Shuliang & Stanley, H. Eugene & Gao, Yachun, 2018. "A methodological framework for vulnerability analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems under deliberate attacks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 21-29.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:196:y:2020:i:c:s0951832019301073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.