IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v137y2015icp58-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability assessment and mitigation for the Chinese railway system under floods

Author

Listed:
  • Hong, Liu
  • Ouyang, Min
  • Peeta, Srinivas
  • He, Xiaozheng
  • Yan, Yongze

Abstract

The economy of China and the travel needs of its citizens depend significantly on the continuous and reliable services provided by its railway system. However, this system is subject to frequent natural hazards, such as floods, earthquakes, and debris flow. A mechanism to assess the railway system vulnerability under these hazards and the design of effective vulnerability mitigation strategies are essential to the reliable functioning of the railway system. This article proposes a comprehensive methodology to quantitatively assess the railway system vulnerability under floods using historical data and GIS technology. The proposed methodology includes a network representation of the railway system, the generation of flood event scenarios, a method to estimate railway link vulnerability, and a quantitative vulnerability value computation approach. The railway system vulnerability is evaluated in terms of its service disruption related to the number of interrupted trains and the durations of interruption. A maintenance strategy to mitigate vulnerability is proposed that simultaneously considers link vulnerability and number of trains using it. Numerical experiments show that the flood-induced vulnerability of the proposed representation of the Chinese railway system reaches its maximum monthly value in July, and the proposed vulnerability mitigation strategy is more effective compared to other strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong, Liu & Ouyang, Min & Peeta, Srinivas & He, Xiaozheng & Yan, Yongze, 2015. "Vulnerability assessment and mitigation for the Chinese railway system under floods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 58-68.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:137:y:2015:i:c:p:58-68
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.12.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832014003202
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2014.12.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Derrible, Sybil & Kennedy, Christopher, 2010. "The complexity and robustness of metro networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(17), pages 3678-3691.
    2. Patterson, S.A. & Apostolakis, G.E., 2007. "Identification of critical locations across multiple infrastructures for terrorist actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(9), pages 1183-1203.
    3. Nicholas Santella & Laura J. Steinberg & Kyle Parks, 2009. "Decision Making for Extreme Events: Modeling Critical Infrastructure Interdependencies to Aid Mitigation and Response Planning," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 26(4), pages 409-422, July.
    4. Adachi, Takao & Ellingwood, Bruce R., 2008. "Serviceability of earthquake-damaged water systems: Effects of electrical power availability and power backup systems on system vulnerability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 78-88.
    5. Ouyang, Min & Dueñas-Osorio, Leonardo, 2011. "An approach to design interface topologies across interdependent urban infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1462-1473.
    6. Sohn, Jungyul, 2006. "Evaluating the significance of highway network links under the flood damage: An accessibility approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 491-506, July.
    7. Wang, Ru & Tan, Jiang-Xia & Wang, Xin & Wang, Du-Juan & Cai, Xu, 2008. "Geographic coarse graining analysis of the railway network of China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(22), pages 5639-5646.
    8. Zio, E. & Ferrario, E., 2013. "A framework for the system-of-systems analysis of the risk for a safety-critical plant exposed to external events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 114-125.
    9. Ouyang, Min & Zhao, Lijing & Hong, Liu & Pan, Zhezhe, 2014. "Comparisons of complex network based models and real train flow model to analyze Chinese railway vulnerability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 38-46.
    10. Ouyang, Min, 2014. "Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 43-60.
    11. T. Rigole & K. Vanthournout & K. De Brabandere & G. Deconinck, 2008. "Agents controlling the electric power infrastructure," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1/2), pages 96-109.
    12. Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. & Rocco, Claudio M. & Levitin, Gregory, 2011. "Optimal network protection against diverse interdictor strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 374-382.
    13. Bompard, E. & Napoli, R. & Xue, F., 2009. "Assessment of information impacts in power system security against malicious attacks in a general framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(6), pages 1087-1094.
    14. Roanes-Lozano, Eugenio & Laita, Luis M. & Roanes-Macías, Eugenio & Wester, Michael J. & Ruiz-Lozano, José Luis & Roncero, Carlos, 2009. "Evolution of railway network flexibility: The Spanish broad gauge case," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(8), pages 2317-2332.
    15. Macchi, Marco & Garetti, Marco & Centrone, Domenico & Fumagalli, Luca & Piero Pavirani, Gian, 2012. "Maintenance management of railway infrastructures based on reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 71-83.
    16. Jenelius, Erik & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2012. "Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: A grid-based approach with case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 746-760.
    17. Chang, Stephanie E. & Nojima, Nobuoto, 2001. "Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: the 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 475-494, July.
    18. Zhang, Jianhua & Xu, Xiaoming & Hong, Liu & Wang, Shuliang & Fei, Qi, 2011. "Networked analysis of the Shanghai subway network, in China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4562-4570.
    19. Burak Cavdaroglu & Erik Hammel & John Mitchell & Thomas Sharkey & William Wallace, 2013. "Integrating restoration and scheduling decisions for disrupted interdependent infrastructure systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 279-294, March.
    20. Kaegi, M. & Mock, R. & Kröger, W., 2009. "Analyzing maintenance strategies by agent-based simulations: A feasibility study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(9), pages 1416-1421.
    21. Long Guo & Xu Cai, 2008. "Degree And Weighted Properties Of The Directed China Railway Network," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(12), pages 1909-1918.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ouyang, Min & Pan, ZheZhe & Hong, Liu & He, Yue, 2015. "Vulnerability analysis of complementary transportation systems with applications to railway and airline systems in China," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 248-257.
    2. Ouyang, Min, 2014. "Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 43-60.
    3. Ouyang, Min, 2016. "Critical location identification and vulnerability analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems under spatially localized attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 106-116.
    4. Hong, Liu & Yan, Yongze & Ouyang, Min & Tian, Hui & He, Xiaozheng, 2017. "Vulnerability effects of passengers' intermodal transfer distance preference and subway expansion on complementary urban public transportation systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 58-72.
    5. Chao Fang & Piao Dong & Yi-Ping Fang & Enrico Zio, 2020. "Vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructure under disruptions: An application to China Railway High-speed," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 235-245, April.
    6. Gao, Guibing & Wang, Junshen & Yue, Wenhui & Ou, Wenchu, 2020. "Structural-vulnerability assessment of reconfigurable manufacturing system based on universal generating function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    7. Hong, Liu & Ye, Bowen & Yan, Han & Zhang, Hui & Ouyang, Min & (Sean) He, Xiaozheng, 2019. "Spatiotemporal vulnerability analysis of railway systems with heterogeneous train flows," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 725-744.
    8. Min Ouyang & Hui Tian & Zhenghua Wang & Liu Hong & Zijun Mao, 2019. "Critical Infrastructure Vulnerability to Spatially Localized Failures with Applications to Chinese Railway System," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 180-194, January.
    9. Hong, Liu & Zhong, Xin & Ouyang, Min & Tian, Hui & He, Xiaozheng, 2019. "Vulnerability analysis of public transit systems from the perspective of urban residential communities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 143-156.
    10. Ouyang, Min, 2017. "A mathematical framework to optimize resilience of interdependent critical infrastructure systems under spatially localized attacks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1072-1084.
    11. Reilly, Allison C. & Baroud, Hiba & Flage, Roger & Gerst, Michael D., 2021. "Sources of uncertainty in interdependent infrastructure and their implications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    12. Yi‐Ping Fang & Giovanni Sansavini & Enrico Zio, 2019. "An Optimization‐Based Framework for the Identification of Vulnerabilities in Electric Power Grids Exposed to Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1949-1969, September.
    13. Wu, Baichao & Tang, Aiping & Wu, Jie, 2016. "Modeling cascading failures in interdependent infrastructures under terrorist attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1-8.
    14. Wang, Shuliang & Zhang, Jianhua & Yue, Xin, 2018. "Multiple robustness assessment method for understanding structural and functional characteristics of the power network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 261-270.
    15. Mühlhofer, Evelyn & Koks, Elco E. & Kropf, Chahan M. & Sansavini, Giovanni & Bresch, David N., 2023. "A generalized natural hazard risk modelling framework for infrastructure failure cascades," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    16. Yingying Xing & Jian Lu & Shengdi Chen & Sunanda Dissanayake, 2017. "Vulnerability analysis of urban rail transit based on complex network theory: a case study of Shanghai Metro," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 501-525, October.
    17. Kashin Sugishita & Yasuo Asakura, 2021. "Vulnerability studies in the fields of transportation and complex networks: a citation network analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, March.
    18. Khademi, Navid & Babaei, Mohsen & Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk & Fani, Amirhossein, 2018. "Analysis of incident costs in a vulnerable sparse rail network – Description and Iran case study," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 9-27.
    19. Ouyang, Min & Liu, Chuang & Wu, Shengyu, 2020. "Worst-case vulnerability assessment and mitigation model of urban utility tunnels," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    20. Kaul, Hemanshu & Rumpf, Adam, 2022. "A linear input dependence model for interdependent networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 781-797.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:137:y:2015:i:c:p:58-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.