IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v165y2017icp402-409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty importance measures of dependent transition rates for transient and steady state probabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Yan-Hui
  • Yam, Richard C.M.

Abstract

Markov models are widely used for describing the behavior of multi-state systems, whose transition rates can be approximated through Bayesian inference based on data from field collections and experiments. The estimates of transition rates departing from the same state can be dependent. In this paper, we investigate the influence of uncertainties associated with the transition rates due to the finiteness of the available data, upon the transient and steady state probabilities. Variance-based methods are employed to understand how the uncertainty in the model output can be apportioned to the model inputs. To deal with dependencies among the transition rates, the dependent transition rates are represented by a group of independent random variables. Uncertainty importance measures (UIMs) are derived based on the total sensitivity indices to rank the transition rates based on their contributions to the output variance. Therefore, actions to improve the accuracy of their estimation can be appropriately guided to reduce the output variance. The extended Fourier amplitude sensitivity test is used for the quantification of the UIMs. A numerical example is provided to illustrate the approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Yan-Hui & Yam, Richard C.M., 2017. "Uncertainty importance measures of dependent transition rates for transient and steady state probabilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 402-409.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:165:y:2017:i:c:p:402-409
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016305336
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Borgonovo, E., 2007. "A new uncertainty importance measure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(6), pages 771-784.
    2. Storlie, Curtis B. & Swiler, Laura P. & Helton, Jon C. & Sallaberry, Cedric J., 2009. "Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1735-1763.
    3. Claudio M Rocco S, 2013. "Affine arithmetic for assessing the uncertainty propagation on steady-state probabilities of Markov models owing to uncertainties in transition rates," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(5), pages 523-533, October.
    4. Zhai, Qingqing & Yang, Jun & Xie, Min & Zhao, Yu, 2014. "Generalized moment-independent importance measures based on Minkowski distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 449-455.
    5. C M Rocco S, 2012. "Effects of the transition rate uncertainty on the steady state probabilities of Markov models using interval arithmetic," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(2), pages 234-245, April.
    6. Ted G. Eschenbach, 1992. "Spiderplots versus Tornado Diagrams for Sensitivity Analysis," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 40-46, December.
    7. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    8. Bernard Philippe & Youcef Saad & William J. Stewart, 1992. "Numerical Methods in Markov Chain Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(6), pages 1156-1179, December.
    9. Xu, C. & Gertner, G., 2007. "Extending a global sensitivity analysis technique to models with correlated parameters," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 5579-5590, August.
    10. Jacques, Julien & Lavergne, Christian & Devictor, Nicolas, 2006. "Sensitivity analysis in presence of model uncertainty and correlated inputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1126-1134.
    11. Rocco S., Claudio M. & Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez, José, 2015. "Assessment of the transition-rates importance of Markovian systems at steady state using the unscented transformation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 212-220.
    12. Borgonovo, E., 2010. "Sensitivity analysis with finite changes: An application to modified EOQ models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 127-138, January.
    13. Xu, Chonggang & Gertner, George Zdzislaw, 2008. "Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models with correlated parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(10), pages 1563-1573.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dui, Hongyan & Wu, Shaomin & Zhao, Jiangbin, 2021. "Some extensions of the component maintenance priority," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mirko Ginocchi & Ferdinanda Ponci & Antonello Monti, 2021. "Sensitivity Analysis and Power Systems: Can We Bridge the Gap? A Review and a Guide to Getting Started," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-59, December.
    2. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Song, Jingwen, 2015. "Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 399-432.
    3. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    4. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    5. López-Benito, Alfredo & Bolado-Lavín, Ricardo, 2017. "A case study on global sensitivity analysis with dependent inputs: The natural gas transmission model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 11-21.
    6. Emanuele Borgonovo & Gordon B. Hazen & Elmar Plischke, 2016. "A Common Rationale for Global Sensitivity Measures and Their Estimation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(10), pages 1871-1895, October.
    7. Sinan Xiao & Zhenzhou Lu & Pan Wang, 2018. "Multivariate Global Sensitivity Analysis Based on Distance Components Decomposition," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2703-2721, December.
    8. Wei, Pengfei & Song, Jingwen & Lu, Zhenzhou & Yue, Zhufeng, 2016. "Time-dependent reliability sensitivity analysis of motion mechanisms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 107-120.
    9. Tatsuya Sakurahara & Seyed Reihani & Ernie Kee & Zahra Mohaghegh, 2020. "Global importance measure methodology for integrated probabilistic risk assessment," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 377-396, April.
    10. Broto, Baptiste & Bachoc, François & Depecker, Marine & Martinez, Jean-Marc, 2019. "Sensitivity indices for independent groups of variables," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 19-31.
    11. Pesenti, Silvana M. & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2019. "Reverse sensitivity testing: What does it take to break the model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 654-670.
    12. Hu, Zhen & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2019. "Probability models for data-Driven global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 40-57.
    13. Konakli, Katerina & Sudret, Bruno, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using low-rank tensor approximations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 64-83.
    14. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Hazen, Gordon B. & Jose, Victor Richmond R. & Plischke, Elmar, 2021. "Probabilistic sensitivity measures as information value," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 595-610.
    15. Isadora Antoniano‐Villalobos & Emanuele Borgonovo & Sumeda Siriwardena, 2018. "Which Parameters Are Important? Differential Importance Under Uncertainty," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2459-2477, November.
    16. Rabitti, Giovanni & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2020. "Is mortality or interest rate the most important risk in annuity models? A comparison of sensitivity analysis methods," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 48-58.
    17. Xie, Xiangzhong & Schenkendorf, René & Krewer, Ulrike, 2019. "Efficient sensitivity analysis and interpretation of parameter correlations in chemical engineering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 159-173.
    18. Kim, Taeyong & Song, Junho, 2018. "Generalized Reliability Importance Measure (GRIM) using Gaussian mixture," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 105-115.
    19. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    20. Daniel Harenberg & Stefano Marelli & Bruno Sudret & Viktor Winschel, 2019. "Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(1), pages 1-41, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:165:y:2017:i:c:p:402-409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.