IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v203y2013i1p279-29410.1007-s10479-011-0959-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating restoration and scheduling decisions for disrupted interdependent infrastructure systems

Author

Listed:
  • Burak Cavdaroglu
  • Erik Hammel
  • John Mitchell
  • Thomas Sharkey
  • William Wallace

Abstract

We consider the problem faced by managers of critical civil interdependent infrastructure systems of restoring essential public services after a non-routine event causes disruptions to these services. In order to restore the services, we must determine the set of components (or tasks) that will be temporarily installed or repaired, assign these tasks to work groups, and then determine the schedule of each work group to complete the tasks assigned to it. These restoration planning and scheduling decisions are often undertaken in an independent, sequential manner. We provide mathematical models and optimization algorithms that integrate the restoration and planning decisions and specifically account for the interdependencies between the infrastructure systems. The objective function of this problem provides a measure of how well the services are being restored over the horizon of the restoration plan, rather than just focusing on the performance of the systems after all restoration efforts are complete. We test our methods on realistic data representing infrastructure systems in New York City. Our computational results demonstrate that we can provide integrated restoration and scheduling plans of high quality with limited computational resources. We also discuss the benefits of integrating the restoration and scheduling decisions. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Burak Cavdaroglu & Erik Hammel & John Mitchell & Thomas Sharkey & William Wallace, 2013. "Integrating restoration and scheduling decisions for disrupted interdependent infrastructure systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 279-294, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:203:y:2013:i:1:p:279-294:10.1007/s10479-011-0959-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-011-0959-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-011-0959-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-011-0959-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. SOUSA, Jorge P. & WOLSEY, Laurence A., 1992. "A time indexed formulation of non-preemptive single machine scheduling problems," LIDAM Reprints CORE 984, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Martin W. P. Savelsbergh & R. N. Uma & Joel Wein, 2005. "An Experimental Study of LP-Based Approximation Algorithms for Scheduling Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 123-136, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baptiste, Philippe & Sadykov, Ruslan, 2010. "Time-indexed formulations for scheduling chains on a single machine: An application to airborne radars," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 476-483, June.
    2. Averbakh, Igor & Pereira, Jordi, 2015. "Network construction problems with due dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 715-729.
    3. Natashia Boland & Riley Clement & Hamish Waterer, 2016. "A Bucket Indexed Formulation for Nonpreemptive Single Machine Scheduling Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 14-30, February.
    4. Nurre, Sarah G. & Cavdaroglu, Burak & Mitchell, John E. & Sharkey, Thomas C. & Wallace, William A., 2012. "Restoring infrastructure systems: An integrated network design and scheduling (INDS) problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 794-806.
    5. Kedad-Sidhoum, Safia & Solis, Yasmin Rios & Sourd, Francis, 2008. "Lower bounds for the earliness-tardiness scheduling problem on parallel machines with distinct due dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 1305-1316, September.
    6. Pasquale Avella & Maurizio Boccia & Carlo Mannino & Igor Vasilyev, 2017. "Time-Indexed Formulations for the Runway Scheduling Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1196-1209, November.
    7. de Lima, Vinícius L. & Alves, Cláudio & Clautiaux, François & Iori, Manuel & Valério de Carvalho, José M., 2022. "Arc flow formulations based on dynamic programming: Theoretical foundations and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(1), pages 3-21.
    8. Li, Dongni & Jiang, Yuzhou & Zhang, Jinhui & Cui, Zihua & Yin, Yong, 2023. "An on-line seru scheduling algorithm with proactive waiting considering resource conflicts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 506-515.
    9. Abdessamad Ait El Cadi & Omar Souissi & Rabie Ben Atitallah & Nicolas Belanger & Abdelhakim Artiba, 2018. "Mathematical programming models for scheduling in a CPU/FPGA architecture with heterogeneous communication delays," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 629-640, March.
    10. Sanjeev Swami & Jehoshua Eliashberg & Charles B. Weinberg, 1999. "SilverScreener: A Modeling Approach to Movie Screens Management," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 352-372.
    11. Balasubramanian, Hari & Fowler, John & Keha, Ahmet & Pfund, Michele, 2009. "Scheduling interfering job sets on parallel machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 55-67, November.
    12. Artur Alves Pessoa & Teobaldo Bulhões & Vitor Nesello & Anand Subramanian, 2022. "Exact Approaches for Single Machine Total Weighted Tardiness Batch Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1512-1530, May.
    13. Francis Sourd, 2009. "New Exact Algorithms for One-Machine Earliness-Tardiness Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 167-175, February.
    14. Pasquale Avella & Maurizio Boccia & Bernardo D’Auria, 2005. "Near-Optimal Solutions of Large-Scale Single-Machine Scheduling Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 183-191, May.
    15. Klamroth, Kathrin & Wiecek, Margaret M., 2001. "A time-dependent multiple criteria single-machine scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 17-26, November.
    16. Kelly Poldi & Silvio Araujo, 2016. "Mathematical models and a heuristic method for the multiperiod one-dimensional cutting stock problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 497-520, March.
    17. Zhang, Hanxiao & Li, Yan-Fu, 2022. "Integrated optimization of test case selection and sequencing for reliability testing of the mainboard of Internet backbone routers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 183-194.
    18. Wolsey, Laurence A., 1997. "MIP modelling of changeovers in production planning and scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 154-165, May.
    19. Zhang, Hongbin & Yang, Yu & Wu, Feng, 2024. "Scheduling a set of jobs with convex piecewise linear cost functions on a single-batch-processing machine," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    20. Rachid Benmansour & Oliver Braun & Saïd Hanafi, 2019. "The single-processor scheduling problem with time restrictions: complexity and related problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 465-471, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:203:y:2013:i:1:p:279-294:10.1007/s10479-011-0959-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.