IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v107y2016icp27-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental analysis of different packaging waste collection systems for Istanbul – Turkey case study

Author

Listed:
  • Yıldız-Geyhan, Eren
  • Yılan-Çiftçi, Gülşah
  • Altun-Çiftçioğlu, Gökçen Alev
  • Neşet Kadırgan, Mehmet Arif

Abstract

Source-separated collection of recyclable packaging wastes has been a huge issue for cities such as Istanbul considering their socially, economically, culturally and environmentally cosmopolite structure. In order to apply an environmentally effective separation and collection, system has to be analyzed with a holistic approach including whole recycled packaging material amounts, source consumptions and related emissions. In this context, the aim of this study is to determine the environmentally optimum source-separated packaging waste collection system applicable in Istanbul, Turkey for the first time in literature. Eight scenarios for separated collection system were defined and all of them were compared with each other and with the existing system. To measure the efficiency of the system, some efficiency indicators were chosen and effectiveness related variables were determined to predict the participation rate. Calculations of the efficiency indicators for alternative scenarios were based on the existing system. The environmental analysis was conducted by using Life Cycle Assessment methodology. The results of this study showed that existing system was still one of the environmentally most promising scenarios. Following advantageous scenarios were Scenarios 5 and 6 which were two and three fractionated curbside collection systems, respectively. It is also seen that more fractionated scenarios were less beneficial than two fractionated scenarios. And finally, it can be concluded that with an increment on participation rate and changing collection material type, collection efficiency of curbside system would increase and be environmentally more beneficial.

Suggested Citation

  • Yıldız-Geyhan, Eren & Yılan-Çiftçi, Gülşah & Altun-Çiftçioğlu, Gökçen Alev & Neşet Kadırgan, Mehmet Arif, 2016. "Environmental analysis of different packaging waste collection systems for Istanbul – Turkey case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 27-37.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:107:y:2016:i:c:p:27-37
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915301403
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, M. & Williams, I.D. & Clark, M., 2006. "Social, cultural and structural influences on household waste recycling: A case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 357-395.
    2. Güereca, Leonor Patricia & Gassó, Santiago & Baldasano, José María & Jiménez-Guerrero, Pedro, 2006. "Life cycle assessment of two biowaste management systems for Barcelona, Spain," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 32-48.
    3. E. Sanneh & Allen Hu & Y. Chang & Edrisa Sanyang, 2011. "Introduction of a recycling system for sustainable municipal solid waste management: a case study on the greater Banjul area of the Gambia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 13(6), pages 1065-1080, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni Biancini & Barbara Marchetti & Luca Cioccolanti & Matteo Moglie, 2022. "Comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment Analysis of an Italian Composting Facility concerning Environmental Footprint Minimization and Renewable Energy Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Moraes, Carlos Alberto Mendes & Kieling, Amanda Gonçalves & Caetano, Marcelo Oliveira & Gomes, Luciana Paulo, 2010. "Life cycle analysis (LCA) for the incorporation of rice husk ash in mortar coating," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1170-1176.
    3. Guang Han & Ping Zhai & Liqun Zhu & Kongqing Li, 2023. "Economic Incentives, Reputation Incentives, and Rural Residents’ Participation in Household Waste Classification: Evidence from Jiangsu, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Muise, Isaac & Adams, Michelle & Côté, Ray & Price, G.W., 2016. "Attitudes to the recovery and recycling of agricultural plastics waste: A case study of Nova Scotia, Canada," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 137-145.
    5. Baihui Jin & Wei Li, 2023. "External Factors Impacting Residents’ Participation in Waste Sorting Using NCA and fsQCA Methods on Pilot Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Dhokhikah, Yeny & Trihadiningrum, Yulinah & Sunaryo, Sony, 2015. "Community participation in household solid waste reduction in Surabaya, Indonesia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 153-162.
    7. Colón, Joan & Martínez-Blanco, Julia & Gabarrell, Xavier & Artola, Adriana & Sánchez, Antoni & Rieradevall, Joan & Font, Xavier, 2010. "Environmental assessment of home composting," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 893-904.
    8. Timlett, R.E. & Williams, I.D., 2008. "Public participation and recycling performance in England: A comparison of tools for behaviour change," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 622-634.
    9. Shira Daskal & Omar Asi & Isam Sabbah & Ofira Ayalon & Katie Baransi-Karkaby, 2022. "Decentralized Composting Analysis Model—Benefit/Cost Decision-Making Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    10. Prestin, Abby & Pearce, Katy E., 2010. "We care a lot: Formative research for a social marketing campaign to promote school-based recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 1017-1026.
    11. Dorothea Christina Schoeman & Isaac Tebogo Rampedi, 2022. "Drivers of Household Recycling Behavior in the City of Johannesburg, South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Li-San Hung & Chongming Wang, 2022. "Decision-making process related to climate change mitigation among married-couple households: A case study of Taiwan," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Baxter, John & Gram-Hanssen, Irmelin, 2016. "Environmental message framing: Enhancing consumer recycling of mobile phones," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 96-101.
    14. Liangjun Peng & Mengdi Gu & Zhijun Peng, 2020. "Study on the Optimized Mode of Waste Governance with Sustainable Urban Development—Case from China’s Urban Waste Classified Collection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, May.
    15. Martinho, Graça & Pires, Ana & Portela, Gonçalo & Fonseca, Miguel, 2015. "Factors affecting consumers’ choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 58-68.
    16. Botetzagias, Iosif & Dima, Andora-Fani & Malesios, Chrisovaladis, 2015. "Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior in the context of recycling: The role of moral norms and of demographic predictors," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 58-67.
    17. Jun Li & Lixian Wang & Yong Chi & Zhaozhi Zhou & Yuanjun Tang & Hui Zhang, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Advanced Circulating Fluidized Bed Municipal Solid Waste Incineration System from an Environmental and Exergetic Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Stefania Testa & Ciro Troise & Silvano Cincotti & Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2024. "The role of electronic waste management solutions and message framing in influencing consumer behaviours: Exploring the crowdfunding context," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 917-929, February.
    19. Shaw, Peter J., 2008. "Nearest neighbour effects in kerbside household waste recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 775-784.
    20. Struk, Michal, 2017. "Distance and incentives matter: The separation of recyclable municipal waste," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 155-162.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:107:y:2016:i:c:p:27-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.