IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v105y2015ipap134-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compostable biopolymer use in the real world: Stakeholder interviews to better understand the motivations and realities of use and disposal in the US

Author

Listed:
  • Meeks, Diana
  • Hottle, Troy
  • Bilec, M.M.
  • Landis, A.E.

Abstract

The use of compostable biopolymers in the United States has grown over the past decade and is predicted to continue to grow over the coming years. Though many studies have been done to assess biopolymer environmental impacts, few have explored how they are actually being used and disposed of by consumers. Only with a thorough understanding of real world use will environmental assessments be able to provide meaningful results that can inform best practices for municipal waste management. This paper identifies and explores where consumers are most likely to come into contact with compostable biopolymers, actual disposal methods, and the motivation behind compostable biopolymer use and disposal. To assess where compostable biopolymers are being used, audits of local grocery stores were conducted, as well as semi-structured interviews with compostable biopolymer users in four different food service categories (cafeterias, catering companies, limited food service establishments, and recreational concessions) were completed. Findings suggest that consumers are most likely coming into contact with compostable biopolymers in a commercial food service setting. The decision to purchase compostable biopolymers was based on a variety of factors, such as their perceived sustainability, but was not directly tied to the ability to compost them. One of the clearest distinctions between those who were able to compost biopolymers and those who sent these products to landfill was the type of sustainability goals each organization set. Measurable waste to landfill goals resulted in biopolymers being sent to compost facilities, in contrast to an amorphous goal to be sustainable, which was connected to biopolymers being sent to landfill. Yet for all food service categories, disposal decisions relied heavily on the regional waste infrastructure that was available.

Suggested Citation

  • Meeks, Diana & Hottle, Troy & Bilec, M.M. & Landis, A.E., 2015. "Compostable biopolymer use in the real world: Stakeholder interviews to better understand the motivations and realities of use and disposal in the US," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 134-142.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:105:y:2015:i:pa:p:134-142
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915301208
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koller, Martin & Sandholzer, Daniel & Salerno, Anna & Braunegg, Gerhart & Narodoslawsky, Michael, 2013. "Biopolymer from industrial residues: Life cycle assessment of poly(hydroxyalkanoates) from whey," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 64-71.
    2. Alexander L. Roes & Martin K. Patel, 2007. "Life Cycle Risks for Human Health: A Comparison of Petroleum Versus Bio‐Based Production of Five Bulk Organic Chemicals," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 1311-1321, October.
    3. Martin Weiss & Juliane Haufe & Michael Carus & Miguel Brandão & Stefan Bringezu & Barbara Hermann & Martin K. Patel, 2012. "A Review of the Environmental Impacts of Biobased Materials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(s1), pages 169-181, April.
    4. Yates, Madeleine R. & Barlow, Claire Y., 2013. "Life cycle assessments of biodegradable, commercial biopolymers—A critical review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 54-66.
    5. Lopez, J.P. & Vilaseca, F. & Barberà, L. & Bayer, R.J. & Pèlach, M.A. & Mutjé, P., 2012. "Processing and properties of biodegradable composites based on Mater-Bi® and hemp core fibres," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 38-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Halayit Abrha & Jonnathan Cabrera & Yexin Dai & Muhammad Irfan & Abrham Toma & Shipu Jiao & Xianhua Liu, 2022. "Bio-Based Plastics Production, Impact and End of Life: A Literature Review and Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Hottle, Troy A. & Bilec, Melissa M. & Landis, Amy E., 2017. "Biopolymer production and end of life comparisons using life cycle assessment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 295-306.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hottle, Troy A. & Bilec, Melissa M. & Landis, Amy E., 2017. "Biopolymer production and end of life comparisons using life cycle assessment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 295-306.
    2. Miller, Sabbie A. & Srubar, Wil V. & Billington, Sarah L. & Lepech, Michael D., 2015. "Integrating durability-based service-life predictions with environmental impact assessments of natural fiber–reinforced composite materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 72-83.
    3. Changping Zhao & Juanjuan Sun & Yun Zhang, 2022. "A Study of the Drivers of Decarbonization in the Plastics Supply Chain in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Sebastian Spierling & Venkateshwaran Venkatachalam & Marina Mudersbach & Nico Becker & Christoph Herrmann & Hans-Josef Endres, 2020. "End-of-Life Options for Bio-Based Plastics in a Circular Economy—Status Quo and Potential from a Life Cycle Assessment Perspective," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Anja Hansen & Jörn Budde & Annette Prochnow, 2016. "Resource Usage Strategies and Trade-Offs between Cropland Demand, Fossil Fuel Consumption, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions—Building Insulation as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-24, June.
    6. Amy Fitzgerald & Will Proud & Ali Kandemir & Richard J. Murphy & David A. Jesson & Richard S. Trask & Ian Hamerton & Marco L. Longana, 2021. "A Life Cycle Engineering Perspective on Biocomposites as a Solution for a Sustainable Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Sarah Schmidt & David Laner, 2023. "The environmental performance of plastic packaging waste management in Germany: Current and future key factors," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1447-1460, December.
    8. Korhonen, Jouni & Honkasalo, Antero & Seppälä, Jyri, 2018. "Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 37-46.
    9. Gerssen-Gondelach, S.J. & Saygin, D. & Wicke, B. & Patel, M.K. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2014. "Competing uses of biomass: Assessment and comparison of the performance of bio-based heat, power, fuels and materials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 964-998.
    10. Kevin Joseph Dillman & Áróra Árnadóttir & Jukka Heinonen & Michał Czepkiewicz & Brynhildur Davíðsdóttir, 2020. "Review and Meta-Analysis of EVs: Embodied Emissions and Environmental Breakeven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-28, November.
    11. Saygin, D. & Gielen, D.J. & Draeck, M. & Worrell, E. & Patel, M.K., 2014. "Assessment of the technical and economic potentials of biomass use for the production of steam, chemicals and polymers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1153-1167.
    12. Pawelzik, P. & Carus, M. & Hotchkiss, J. & Narayan, R. & Selke, S. & Wellisch, M. & Weiss, M. & Wicke, B. & Patel, M.K., 2013. "Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials – Reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 211-228.
    13. Javad Torkashvand & Mohammad Mahdi Emamjomeh & Mitra Gholami & Mahdi Farzadkia, 2021. "Analysis of cost–benefit in life-cycle of plastic solid waste: combining waste flow analysis and life cycle cost as a decision support tool to the selection of optimum scenario," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13242-13260, September.
    14. Albers, Ariane & Collet, Pierre & Lorne, Daphné & Benoist, Anthony & Hélias, Arnaud, 2019. "Coupling partial-equilibrium and dynamic biogenic carbon models to assess future transport scenarios in France," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 316-330.
    15. Naiara Cañado & Erlantz Lizundia & Ortzi Akizu‐Gardoki & Rikardo Minguez & Blanca Lekube & Alex Arrillaga & Maider Iturrondobeitia, 2022. "3D printing to enable the reuse of marine plastic waste with reduced environmental impacts," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 2092-2107, December.
    16. Schettini, Evelia & Santagata, Gabriella & Malinconico, Mario & Immirzi, Barbara & Scarascia Mugnozza, Giacomo & Vox, Giuliano, 2013. "Recycled wastes of tomato and hemp fibres for biodegradable pots: Physico-chemical characterization and field performance," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 9-19.
    17. Barlow, C.Y. & Morgan, D.C., 2013. "Polymer film packaging for food: An environmental assessment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 74-80.
    18. Beike Sumfleth & Stefan Majer & Daniela Thrän, 2020. "Recent Developments in Low iLUC Policies and Certification in the EU Biobased Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-34, October.
    19. Raphael Asada & Tamás Krisztin & Fulvio di Fulvio & Florian Kraxner & Tobias Stern, 2020. "Bioeconomic transition?: Projecting consumption‐based biomass and fossil material flows to 2050," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 1059-1073, October.
    20. Johann Wackerbauer & Tilmann Rave & Lara Dammer & Stephan Piotrowski & Wiebke Jander & Philipp Grundmann & Sven Wydra & Ulrich Schmoch, 2019. "Determination of Economic Indicators and Indicators for Monitoring the Progress of the Bio-Economy," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 104, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:105:y:2015:i:pa:p:134-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.