IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v53y1997i2p141-156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology

Author

Listed:
  • Kakati, M.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Kakati, M., 1997. "Strategic evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 141-156, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:53:y:1997:i:2:p:141-156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(97)00115-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tayles, Mike & Drury, Colin, 1994. "New manufacturing technologies and management accounting systems: Some evidence of the perceptions of UK management accounting practitioners," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Dorothy Leonard-Barton, 1987. "Implementing Structured Software Methodologies: A Case of Innovation in Process Technology," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 6-17, June.
    3. Blake Ives & Margrethe H. Olson, 1984. "User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 586-603, May.
    4. Canada, John R. & Sullivan, W. G., 1990. "Persistent pitfalls and applicable approaches for justification of advanced manufacturing systems," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 247-253, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bonnin Roca, Jaime & O'Sullivan, Eoin, 2020. "Seeking coherence between barriers to manufacturing technology adoption and innovation policy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. Bokhorst, Jos A. C. & Slomp, Jannes & Suresh, Nallan C., 2002. "An integrated model for part-operation allocation and investments in CNC technology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 267-285, February.
    3. Kulak, Osman & Kahraman, Cengiz, 2005. "Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 415-424, March.
    4. Sonntag, Viki, 2000. "Sustainability -- in light of competitiveness," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 101-113, July.
    5. Silva, Andreia & Correia Simões, Ana & Blanc, Renata, 2024. "Supporting decision-making of collaborative robot (cobot) adoption: The development of a framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    6. Weller, Christian & Kleer, Robin & Piller, Frank T., 2015. "Economic implications of 3D printing: Market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 43-56.
    7. Zhou, Honggeng & Keong Leong, G. & Jonsson, Patrik & Sum, Chee-Chuong, 2009. "A comparative study of advanced manufacturing technology and manufacturing infrastructure investments in Singapore and Sweden," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 42-53, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elbanna, Amany & Newman, Mike, 2022. "The bright side and the dark side of top management support in Digital Transformaion –A hermeneutical reading," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Janet Trewin, 1996. "The Impact of the Introduction of an Expert System on a Public Accounting Organization," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(3), pages 185-197, September.
    3. K. Jin & Ronald Drozdenko, 2010. "Relationships among Perceived Organizational Core Values, Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Organizational Performance Outcomes: An Empirical Study of Information Technology Professionals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 341-359, March.
    4. Gelderman, Maarten, 1997. "Task difficulty, task variability and satisfaction with management support systems: consequences and solutions ˜," Serie Research Memoranda 0053, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    5. Trkman, Peter, 2010. "The critical success factors of business process management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-134.
    6. Jong Uk Kim & Rajiv Kishore, 2019. "Do we Fully Understand Information Systems Failure? An Exploratory Study of the Cognitive Schema of IS Professionals," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1385-1419, December.
    7. Hunton, James E. & Gibson, Dana, 1999. "Soliciting user-input during the development of an accounting information system: investigating the efficacy of group discussion," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 597-618, October.
    8. Teng, James TC & Fiedler, Kirk D & Grover, Varun, 1998. "An exploratory study of the influence of the IS function and organizational context on business process reengineering project initiatives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 679-698, December.
    9. Sven Heidenreich & Katrin Talke, 2020. "Consequences of mandated usage of innovations in organizations: developing an innovation decision model of symbolic and forced adoption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 279-298, December.
    10. Gelderman, M., 1995. "Factors affecting the success of management support systems: analysis and meta-analysis," Serie Research Memoranda 0020, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    11. Schaarschmidt, Mario & Kilian, Thomas, 2014. "Impediments to customer integration into the innovation process: A case study in the telecommunications industry," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 350-361.
    12. Teng, J. T. C. & Grover, V. & Fiedler, K. D., 1996. "Developing strategic perspectives on business process reengineering: From process reconfiguration to organizational change," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 271-294, June.
    13. Sahin, Izzet & Zahedi, Fatemeh (Mariam), 2000. "Optimal policies under risk for changing software systems based on customer satisfaction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 175-194, May.
    14. Bhimani, Alnoor, 2003. "A study of the emergence of management accounting system ethos and its influence on perceived system success," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 523-548, August.
    15. Laurie J. Kirsch & V. Sambamurthy & Dong-Gil Ko & Russell L. Purvis, 2002. "Controlling Information Systems Development Projects: The View from the Client," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 484-498, April.
    16. Macinati, Manuela S. & Anessi-Pessina, E., 2014. "Management accounting use and financial performance in public health-care organisations: Evidence from the Italian National Health Service," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 98-111.
    17. Aurélien Acquier & Eva Boxenbaum & Rebecca Pinheiro-Croisel, 2011. "Standards and innovation in emerging fields: Pushing breakthrough innovation or enrolling actors? An analysis of eco-district standards in France and Denmark," Post-Print halshs-00743376, HAL.
    18. van Bruggen, G.H. & Wierenga, B., 2005. "When are CRM Systems Successful? The Perspective of the User and of the Organization," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-048-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    19. Stockdale, Rosemary & Standing, Craig, 2006. "An interpretive approach to evaluating information systems: A content, context, process framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(3), pages 1090-1102, September.
    20. Madhavan, Naveen & White, Gareth R.T. & Jones, Paul, 2023. "Identifying the value of a clinical information system during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:53:y:1997:i:2:p:141-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.