IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/isacfm/v5y1996i3p185-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of the Introduction of an Expert System on a Public Accounting Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Janet Trewin

Abstract

Little research has addressed the effects of the introduction of an expert system on an organization. This study uses an embedded, multiple case study design to investigate the changes that occurred in the technology, structure, and culture of a public accounting organization when an expert system was introduced. The system of interest was Coopers & Lybrand's ExperTAX and three Coopers & Lybrand field offices served as case sites. Evidence was gathered from two departments (audit and tax) and three levels (staff, manager, and partner) at each site. The major source of evidence was personal interviews with Coopers & Lybrand personnel. Analysis of the evidence included a comparison of each site pre‐ and post‐system introduction and comparisons of the impacts across sites. The analysis of the evidence indicated that changes related to the introduction of ExperTAX did occur. However, the majority of the changes were associated not only with the design features of the system but also with the scope of the system and the guidelines issued for its use.

Suggested Citation

  • Janet Trewin, 1996. "The Impact of the Introduction of an Expert System on a Public Accounting Organization," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(3), pages 185-197, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:5:y:1996:i:3:p:185-197
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1174(199609)5:33.0.CO;2-M
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1174(199609)5:33.0.CO;2-M
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1174(199609)5:33.0.CO;2-M?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bariff, Martin L. & Galbraith, Jay R., 1978. "Intraorganizational power considerations for designing information systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 15-27, February.
    2. Blake Ives & Margrethe H. Olson, 1984. "User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 586-603, May.
    3. Markus, M. Lynne & Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 1983. "Power and the design and implementation of accounting and control systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 8(2-3), pages 205-218, May.
    4. Bjorn-Andersen, Niels & Pedersen, Poul H., 1980. "Computer facilitated changes in the management power structure," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 203-216, April.
    5. Chris Argyris, 1971. "Management Information Systems: The Challenge to Rationality and Emotionality," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(6), pages 275-292, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahrens, Thomas & Chapman, Christopher S., 2007. "Management accounting as practice," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-2), pages 1-27.
    2. Bhimani, Alnoor, 2003. "A study of the emergence of management accounting system ethos and its influence on perceived system success," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 523-548, August.
    3. Amalou-Döpke, Linda & Süß, Stefan, 2014. "HR measurement as an instrument of the HR department in its exchange relationship with top management: A qualitative study based on resource dependence theory," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 444-460.
    4. Vaivio, J., 2006. "The accounting of "The Meeting": Examining calculability within a "Fluid" local space," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 735-762, November.
    5. Artz, Martin & Homburg, Christian & Rajab, Thomas, 2012. "Performance-measurement system design and functional strategic decision influence: The role of performance-measure properties," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 445-460.
    6. Peter Skaerbaek, 1998. "The politics of accounting technology in Danish central government," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 209-236.
    7. Juhani Vaivio, 2008. "Qualitative management accounting research: rationale, pitfalls and potential," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(1), pages 64-86, March.
    8. K. Jin & Ronald Drozdenko, 2010. "Relationships among Perceived Organizational Core Values, Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Organizational Performance Outcomes: An Empirical Study of Information Technology Professionals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 341-359, March.
    9. Trkman, Peter, 2010. "The critical success factors of business process management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-134.
    10. Jong Uk Kim & Rajiv Kishore, 2019. "Do we Fully Understand Information Systems Failure? An Exploratory Study of the Cognitive Schema of IS Professionals," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1385-1419, December.
    11. Teng, James TC & Fiedler, Kirk D & Grover, Varun, 1998. "An exploratory study of the influence of the IS function and organizational context on business process reengineering project initiatives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 679-698, December.
    12. Gelderman, M., 1995. "Factors affecting the success of management support systems: analysis and meta-analysis," Serie Research Memoranda 0020, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    13. Teng, J. T. C. & Grover, V. & Fiedler, K. D., 1996. "Developing strategic perspectives on business process reengineering: From process reconfiguration to organizational change," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 271-294, June.
    14. Julio J. Rotemberg, 1993. "Power in Profit‐Maximizing Organizations," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(2), pages 165-198, June.
    15. Matejka, M. & De Waegenaere, A.M.B., 2000. "Organizational Design and Management Accounting Change," Discussion Paper 2000-61, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    16. Laurie J. Kirsch & V. Sambamurthy & Dong-Gil Ko & Russell L. Purvis, 2002. "Controlling Information Systems Development Projects: The View from the Client," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 484-498, April.
    17. Aurélien Acquier & Eva Boxenbaum & Rebecca Pinheiro-Croisel, 2011. "Standards and innovation in emerging fields: Pushing breakthrough innovation or enrolling actors? An analysis of eco-district standards in France and Denmark," Post-Print halshs-00743376, HAL.
    18. van Bruggen, G.H. & Wierenga, B., 2005. "When are CRM Systems Successful? The Perspective of the User and of the Organization," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-048-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    19. Stockdale, Rosemary & Standing, Craig, 2006. "An interpretive approach to evaluating information systems: A content, context, process framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(3), pages 1090-1102, September.
    20. Madhavan, Naveen & White, Gareth R.T. & Jones, Paul, 2023. "Identifying the value of a clinical information system during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:5:y:1996:i:3:p:185-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1099-1174/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.