IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v247y2022ics0925527322000214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hesitant fuzzy linguistic QFD approach for formulating sustainable supplier development programs

Author

Listed:
  • Finger, Gustavo Strauch Wilin
  • Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues

Abstract

Buying companies increasingly need to establish supplier development programs to improve the economic, environmental, and social performance of their suppliers. However, decision models that support the analysis and choice of sustainable supplier development programs (SSDPs) are relatively scarce in the literature. Given this context, this study proposes a model to support the formulation of SSDPs based on the HFLTS-QFD method, which combines Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets with the Quality Function Deployment technique. This model was applied to a European automotive company based on the judgments of an expert who evaluated six SSDPs regarding a set of buying company requirements. In this application, cost and quality were considered to be the most important requirements, whereas the programs related to the adjustment of production capacity, cost reduction, and the creation of a Kaizen system were classified as priorities for implementation. The results of the sensitivity analysis tests considering pessimistic and optimistic scenarios reinforced the robustness of the model. When compared with previous approaches, the proposed model presents several advantages, such as: it allows decision makers to use more than one linguistic term and linguistic expressions to evaluate buying company requirements and SSDPs; it considers the difficulty of implementation as a decision factor in selecting the most suitable SSDPs; and it provides an implementation ranking for the selected SSDPs based on the estimated implementation time and its potential to generate benefits for the buying company.

Suggested Citation

  • Finger, Gustavo Strauch Wilin & Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues, 2022. "A hesitant fuzzy linguistic QFD approach for formulating sustainable supplier development programs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:247:y:2022:i:c:s0925527322000214
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527322000214
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Araz, Ceyhun & Ozkarahan, Irem, 2007. "Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 585-606, April.
    2. Osiro, Lauro & Lima-Junior, Francisco R. & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar R., 2014. "A fuzzy logic approach to supplier evaluation for development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 95-112.
    3. Talluri, Srinivas & Narasimhan, Ram, 2004. "A methodology for strategic sourcing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(1), pages 236-250, April.
    4. Imre Dobos & Gyöngyi Vörösmarty, 2019. "Evaluating green suppliers: improving supplier performance with DEA in the presence of incomplete data," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(2), pages 483-495, June.
    5. Meisel, Frank & Glock, C. H., 2018. "Self-induced learning vs. project-based supplier development for production ramp-up with two supply options," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 94855, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    6. Abdollah Noorizadeh & Kamran Rashidi & Antti Peltokorpi, 2018. "Categorizing suppliers for development investments in construction: application of DEA and RFM concept," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(9), pages 487-506, September.
    7. Jia Huang & Xiao-Yue You & Hu-Chen Liu & Sheng-Li Si, 2019. "New approach for quality function deployment based on proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and prospect theory," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(5), pages 1283-1299, March.
    8. Ali Aghazadeh Ardebili & Elio Padoano, 2020. "A Literature Review of the Concepts of Resilience and Sustainability in Group Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Dou, Yijie & Zhu, Qinghua & Sarkis, Joseph, 2014. "Evaluating green supplier development programs with a grey-analytical network process-based methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 420-431.
    10. Yijie Dou & Qinghua Zhu & Joseph Sarkis, 2015. "Integrating Strategic Carbon Management into Formal Evaluation of Environmental Supplier Development Programs," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 873-891, December.
    11. Quigley, John & Walls, Lesley & Demirel, Güven & MacCarthy, Bart L. & Parsa, Mahdi, 2018. "Supplier quality improvement: The value of information under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 932-947.
    12. Meisel, Frank & Glock, Christoph H., 2018. "Self-induced learning vs. project-based supplier development for production ramp-up with two supply options," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 60-69.
    13. Konrad Zimmer & Magnus Fröhling & Frank Schultmann, 2016. "Sustainable supplier management -- a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(5), pages 1412-1442, March.
    14. Bai, Chunguang & Dhavale, Dileep & Sarkis, Joseph, 2016. "Complex investment decisions using rough set and fuzzy c-means: An example of investment in green supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 507-521.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Resende, Carlos Henrique Lopes & Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2023. "Decision-making models for formulating and evaluating supplier development programs: A state-of-the-art review and research paths," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Francisco Rodrigues Lima-Junior & Mery Ellen Brandt de Oliveira & Carlos Henrique Lopes Resende, 2023. "An Overview of Applications of Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets in Supply Chain Management: The State of the Art and Future Directions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-40, June.
    3. Zhou, Fang & Chen, Ting-Yu, 2023. "A hybrid group decision-making approach involving Pythagorean fuzzy uncertainty for green supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    4. Babek Erdebilli & Çiğdem Sıcakyüz, 2024. "An Integrated Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy (Q-ROF) for the Selection of Supply-Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Zhigang Fan & Tae-Won Kang, 2023. "Linking Sustainable Supplier Selection to Firm’s Sustainable Performance: The Moderated Mediating Role of Supplier Development and Leadership for Functional Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Ali Ibrahim Balin & Kazim Sari, 2023. "The Effect of Green Purchasing Practices on Financial Performance under the Mediating Role of Environmental Performance: Evidence from Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Jian-Peng Chang & Heng-Xin Ren & Luis Martínez & Witold Pedrycz & Zhen-Song Chen, 2024. "Requirement-driven supplier selection: a multi-criteria QFD-based approach under epistemic and stochastic uncertainties," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(2), pages 1079-1128, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Resende, Carlos Henrique Lopes & Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2023. "Decision-making models for formulating and evaluating supplier development programs: A state-of-the-art review and research paths," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H. & Ries, Jörg M., 2017. "Reprint of “Decision support models for supplier development: Systematic literature review and research agenda”," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 246-260.
    3. Golmohammadi, Amirmohsen & Taghavi, Majid & Farivar, Samira & Azad, Nader, 2018. "Three strategies for engaging a buyer in supplier development efforts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1-14.
    4. Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2016. "Combining SCOR® model and fuzzy TOPSIS for supplier evaluation and management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 128-141.
    5. Handson Claudio Dias Pimenta & Peter Ball & Konstantinos Salonitis, 2021. "Supply chain environmental and social sustainability practice diffusion: Bibliometrics, content analysis and conceptual framework," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1870-1890, November.
    6. Lingxuan Liu & Min Zhang & Linda C. Hendry & Maoliang Bu & Shi Wang, 2018. "Supplier Development Practices for Sustainability: A Multi‐Stakeholder Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 100-116, January.
    7. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Siavash Hekmat & Per J. Agrell, 2022. "A strategy-based framework for supplier selection: a grey PCA-DEA approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 263-297, March.
    8. Maciej Urbaniak & Piotr Rogala & Piotr Kafel, 2023. "Expectations of manufacturing companies regarding future priorities of improvement actions taken by their suppliers," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 296-310, March.
    9. Wagner, Stephan M., 2011. "Supplier development and the relationship life-cycle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 277-283, February.
    10. Wenwen Zhu & Zhiqiang Wang, 2018. "The Collaborative Networks and Thematic Trends of Research on Purchasing and Supply Management for Environmental Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    11. Xiongyong Zhou & Zhiduan Xu, 2018. "An Integrated Sustainable Supplier Selection Approach Based on Hybrid Information Aggregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-49, July.
    12. Zhou, Rui & Bhuiyan, Tanveer Hossain & Medal, Hugh R. & Sherwin, Michael D. & Yang, Dong, 2022. "A stochastic programming model with endogenous uncertainty for selecting supplier development programs to proactively mitigate supplier risk," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    13. Nasr, Walid W. & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2019. "Supplier development in a two-level lot sizing problem with non-conforming items and learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 349-363.
    14. Maciej Urbaniak & Blanka Tundys & Magdalena Ankiel, 2021. "Expectations of Production Companies Operating in Poland towards Suppliers with Regards to Implementation of the Sustainability Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Dubey, Vivek Kumar & Chavas, Jean-Paul & Veeramani, Dharmaraj, 2018. "Analytical framework for sustainable supply-chain contract management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 240-261.
    16. Konur, Dinçer, 2017. "Non-collaborative emission targets joining and quantity flow decisions in a Stackelberg setting," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 60-82.
    17. Chunguang Bai & Simonov Kusi-Sarpong & Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan & Diego Vazquez-Brust, 2021. "Sustainable buyer–supplier relationship capability development: a relational framework and visualization methodology," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 1-34, September.
    18. Hao Xu & Liuxin Chen & Qiongfang Li & Jianchao Yang, 2021. "A Multi-Attribute Decision Method under Uncertainty Environment Conditions—The Green Supplier Evaluation Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Mishra, Arunodaya Raj & Mardani, Abbas & Rani, Pratibha & Kamyab, Hesam & Alrasheedi, Melfi, 2021. "A new intuitionistic fuzzy combinative distance-based assessment framework to assess low-carbon sustainable suppliers in the maritime sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    20. Falagario, Marco & Sciancalepore, Fabio & Costantino, Nicola & Pietroforte, Roberto, 2012. "Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 523-529.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:247:y:2022:i:c:s0925527322000214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.