IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v198y2018icp60-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-induced learning vs. project-based supplier development for production ramp-up with two supply options

Author

Listed:
  • Meisel, Frank
  • Glock, Christoph H.

Abstract

Due to the important role suppliers play in the generation of customer value today, supplier development has attracted the attention of many companies in recent years. One challenge companies wishing to engage in supplier development face is to select both the right suppliers for supplier development as well as adequate supplier development measures and to align supplier development initiatives with the company's remaining sourcing activities. This problem becomes even more pressing during production ramp-up, where an increasing customer demand forces companies to expand the capacities of their supplier base as well. Albeit research on supplier development has enjoyed an increasing popularity in recent years, only a few mathematical models exist to date that support companies in making optimal supplier development decisions. The paper at hand contributes to closing this research gap by developing a decision support model that assists companies in selecting suppliers, in scheduling supplier development projects and in assigning order quantities to selected suppliers. In developing the proposed model, the paper accounts for the fact that suppliers often improve their performance also in the absence of supplier development, and thus considers both self-induced performance improvements at the suppliers as well as performance improvements induced by supplier development projects. The results of a numerical experiment imply that the supplier selection, order allocation and supplier development decisions are subject to complex interactions. The model proposed in this paper supports companies in fitting their supplier development activities to the requirements of the sourcing scenario they face with the intention to maximize profit.

Suggested Citation

  • Meisel, Frank & Glock, Christoph H., 2018. "Self-induced learning vs. project-based supplier development for production ramp-up with two supply options," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 60-69.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:198:y:2018:i:c:p:60-69
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527318300598
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Resende, Carlos Henrique Lopes & Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2023. "Decision-making models for formulating and evaluating supplier development programs: A state-of-the-art review and research paths," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Nasr, Walid W. & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2019. "Supplier development in a two-level lot sizing problem with non-conforming items and learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 349-363.
    3. Finger, Gustavo Strauch Wilin & Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues, 2022. "A hesitant fuzzy linguistic QFD approach for formulating sustainable supplier development programs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Golmohammadi, Amirmohsen & Taghavi, Majid & Farivar, Samira & Azad, Nader, 2018. "Three strategies for engaging a buyer in supplier development efforts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:198:y:2018:i:c:p:60-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.