IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v225y2020ics0925527319304232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deprecated in policy, abundant in market? The frugal innovation of Chinese low-speed EV industry

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Chao
  • Chang, Feifan
  • Rong, Ke
  • Shi, Yongjiang
  • Yu, Xiaoyu

Abstract

In the era of “Industry 4.0”, individualized demand and small batch customization manufacturing will become the trend, which calls for strong capabilities of customer orientation and rapid reaction. In addition to the redesign of smart and autonomous production processes, the market-oriented frugal innovation is a valuable exploration under the framework of “Industry 4.0”. This paper anchors itself at a deprecated policy context to study frugal innovation patterns and their forming mechanisms, which is still a rarely touched area. By selecting as its cases Shifeng, Baoya and Taiqi from the Shandong province, China, this paper uses a qualitative approach to analyze low-speed electric vehicle (EV) businesses according to a three-dimension frugal innovation framework composed by business ecosystem (BE) configurations, BE capabilities and innovation process. The findings are as follows, (1) there are three typical frugal innovation patterns, namely market-based persistence, market-based contingency and technology-based contingency, which help frugal innovators obtain an abundant market performance even under a deprecated policy environment; (2) a vertical integration network and strong marketing capabilities are the capital to select a market-based persistence pattern, while the lack of some substantial resources and capabilities compels firms to have to adopt a more flexible way of frugal innovation in order to carve out a safe niche. This paper contributes to frugal innovation research by exploring a new deprecated policy context rather than traditional institution voids, constructing a frugal innovation framework from the BE perspective by focusing on focal firms, and proposing three frugal innovation patterns under different resource constraints. From the practical side, this paper suggests that future innovation policy should balance advanced technology requirements and practical market demands, and the governments should also emphasize market positioning and demand orientation in the process of Industry 4.0 transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Chao & Chang, Feifan & Rong, Ke & Shi, Yongjiang & Yu, Xiaoyu, 2020. "Deprecated in policy, abundant in market? The frugal innovation of Chinese low-speed EV industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:225:y:2020:i:c:s0925527319304232
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527319304232
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107583?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lütjen, Heiner & Tietze, Frank & Schultz, Carsten, 2017. "Service transitions of product-centric firms: An explorative study of service transition stages and barriers in Germany's energy market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 106-119.
    2. Schaarschmidt, Mario & Kilian, Thomas, 2014. "Impediments to customer integration into the innovation process: A case study in the telecommunications industry," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 350-361.
    3. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    4. Lu, Chao & Liu, Hu-Chen & Tao, Jie & Rong, Ke & Hsieh, Ying-Che, 2017. "A key stakeholder-based financial subsidy stimulation for Chinese EV industrialization: A system dynamics simulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Mair, Johanna & Marti, Ignasi, 2009. "Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 419-435, September.
    6. Walter, Achim & Auer, Michael & Ritter, Thomas, 2006. "The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 541-567, July.
    7. Ronaldo Parente & Ke Rong & José-Mauricio G. Geleilate & Everlyne Misati, 2019. "Adapting and sustaining operations in weak institutional environments: A business ecosystem assessment of a Chinese MNE in Central Africa," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(2), pages 275-291, March.
    8. Rong, Ke & Hu, Guangyu & Lin, Yong & Shi, Yongjiang & Guo, Liang, 2015. "Understanding business ecosystem using a 6C framework in Internet-of-Things-based sectors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 41-55.
    9. Tiwari, Rajnish & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2012. "Frugal Innovation: A Global Networks’ Perspective," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 66(3), pages 245-274.
    10. Hossain, Mokter & Simula, Henri & Halme, Minna, 2016. "Can frugal go global? Diffusion patterns of frugal innovations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 132-139.
    11. Rao, Balkrishna C., 2013. "How disruptive is frugal?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 65-73.
    12. Galia, Fabrice & Legros, Diego, 2004. "Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1185-1199, October.
    13. von Zedtwitz, Maximilian & Gassmann, Oliver, 2002. "Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 569-588, May.
    14. Lambertini, Luca & Orsini, Raimondello & Palestini, Arsen, 2017. "On the instability of the R&D portfolio in a dynamic monopoly. Or, one cannot get two eggs in one basket," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 703-712.
    15. Rong, Ke & Wu, Jinxi & Shi, Yongjiang & Guo, Liang, 2015. "Nurturing business ecosystems for growth in a foreign market: Incubating, identifying and integrating stakeholders," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 293-308.
    16. K. S. Manikandan & J. Ramachandran, 2015. "Beyond institutional voids: Business groups, incomplete markets, and organizational form," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 598-617, April.
    17. Ying-Che Hsieh & Kuo-Yi Lin & Chao Lu & Ke Rong, 2017. "Governing a Sustainable Business Ecosystem in Taiwan’s Circular Economy: The Story of Spring Pool Glass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Tiwari, Rajnish & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2012. "Open global innovation networks as enablers of frugal innovation: propositions based on evidence from India," Working Papers 72, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarkar, Soumodip & Mateus, Sara, 2022. "Value creation using minimal resources – A meta-synthesis of frugal innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Cannavacciuolo, Lorella & Ferraro, Giovanna & Ponsiglione, Cristina & Primario, Simonetta & Quinto, Ivana, 2023. "Technological innovation-enabling industry 4.0 paradigm: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hou, Hong & Shi, Yongjiang, 2021. "Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A constructive examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Viktora-Jones, Magdalena & Parente, Ronaldo & Drori, Netanel & Zhao, Yue, 2024. "Firm performance drivers within a dynamic emerging market ecosystem," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    3. Lütjen, Heiner & Schultz, Carsten & Tietze, Frank & Urmetzer, Florian, 2019. "Managing ecosystems for service innovation: A dynamic capability view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 506-519.
    4. Liu, Gordon & Aroean, Lukman & Ko, Wai Wai, 2023. "Service innovation in business ecosystem: The roles of shared goals, coopetition, and interfirm power," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    5. Han, Jin & Zhou, Haibo & Löwik, Sandor & de Weerd-Nederhof, Petra, 2022. "Building and sustaining emerging ecosystems through new focal ventures: Evidence from China's bike-sharing industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Rong, Ke & Kang, Zhengyao & Williamson, Peter J., 2022. "Liability of ecosystem integration and internationalisation of digital firms," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4).
    7. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    8. Ying-Che Hsieh & Kuo-Yi Lin & Chao Lu & Ke Rong, 2017. "Governing a Sustainable Business Ecosystem in Taiwan’s Circular Economy: The Story of Spring Pool Glass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Ronaldo Parente & Ke Rong & José-Mauricio G. Geleilate & Everlyne Misati, 2019. "Adapting and sustaining operations in weak institutional environments: A business ecosystem assessment of a Chinese MNE in Central Africa," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(2), pages 275-291, March.
    10. Rossetto, Dennys Eduardo & Borini, Felipe Mendes & Bernardes, Roberto Carlos & Frankwick, Gary L., 2023. "Measuring frugal innovation capabilities: An initial scale proposition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    11. Sun, Qiao & Wang, Chang & Zhou, Yifang & Zuo, Lyushui & Song, Huiling, 2023. "How to build business ecosystems for e-waste online recycling platforms: A comparative study of two typical cases in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    12. Hossain, Mokter, 2017. "Mapping the frugal innovation phenomenon," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 199-208.
    13. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Salerno, Mario Sergio & Ikenami, Rodrigo Kazuo, 2018. "Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 30-48.
    14. Dabić, Marina & Obradović, Tena & Vlačić, Božidar & Sahasranamam, Sreevas & Paul, Justin, 2022. "Frugal innovations: A multidisciplinary review & agenda for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 914-929.
    15. Ke Rong & Yong Lin & Boyi Li & Thommie Burström & Lynne Butel & Jiang Yu, 2018. "Business ecosystem research agenda: more dynamic, more embedded, and more internationalized," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(3), pages 167-182, July.
    16. Christopher S. Hayter, 2016. "A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: the role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 633-656, October.
    17. Jianlong Wu & Zhongji Yang & Xiaobo Hu & Hongqi Wang & Jing Huang, 2018. "Exploring Driving Forces of Sustainable Development of China’s New Energy Vehicle Industry: An Analysis from the Perspective of an Innovation Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Sophia Barquete & Ana Hiromi Shimozono & Adriana Hofmann Trevisan & Camila Gonçalves Castro & Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos Gomes & Janaina Mascarenhas, 2022. "Exploring the Dynamic of a Circular Ecosystem: A Case Study about Drivers and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    19. Nihad Faissal Bassis & Fabiano Armellini, 2018. "Systems of innovation and innovation ecosystems: a literature review in search of complementarities," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 1053-1080, December.
    20. Mark A. Phillips & Jagjit Singh Srai, 2018. "Exploring Emerging Ecosystem Boundaries: Defining ‘The Game’," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(08), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:225:y:2020:i:c:s0925527319304232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.