IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v30y2021i1p60-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder perception of reverse logistics practices on supply chain performance

Author

Listed:
  • NNC Pushpamali
  • Duzgun Agdas
  • Timothy M. Rose
  • Tan Yigitcanlar

Abstract

Managing supply chain performance is essential for value generation to stakeholders. Nonetheless, this process has become overly complicated due to environmental concerns that lead to policy changes, customer preferences, and business activities. Reverse logistics is an environmentally friendly practice that can be critical in improving the environmental performance of construction operations. This paper examines the perceived role of reverse logistics practices on supply chain performance criteria—for example, cost, quality, time, flexibility, and environment. Semistructured in‐depth interviews were conducted with 15 senior industry experts from South East Queensland, Australia. Interview transcripts were analyzed by coding, categorizing, and identifying the interconnected relationships among concepts. In general, the experts perceive that reverse logistics practices significantly reduce the sourcing cost of materials compared with new materials. When used materials meet industry specifications, they are expected to have a similar performance without affecting the construction time or the overall quality of the project while protecting the environment. Nevertheless, the flexibility is found to be somewhat difficult. It is likely that reverse logistics can be instrumental in construction should the industry uptake be substantial with an emphasis on used material quality and acceptance criteria. Hence, a quantitative analysis is encouraged for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • NNC Pushpamali & Duzgun Agdas & Timothy M. Rose & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Stakeholder perception of reverse logistics practices on supply chain performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 60-70, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:60-70
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.2609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2609
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.2609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sara Saberi & Mahtab Kouhizadeh & Joseph Sarkis & Lejia Shen, 2019. "Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 2117-2135, April.
    2. Miguel Afonso Sellitto & Giancarlo Medeiros Pereira & Miriam Borchardt & Rosnaldo Inácio da Silva & Cláudia Viviane Viegas, 2015. "A SCOR-based model for supply chain performance measurement: application in the footwear industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(16), pages 4917-4926, August.
    3. Rakesh Kumar Malviya & Ravi Kant & Ashim Dutta Gupta, 2018. "Evaluation and Selection of Sustainable Strategy for Green Supply Chain Management Implementation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 475-502, May.
    4. Debora Sotto & Arlindo Philippi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Md Kamruzzaman, 2019. "Aligning Urban Policy with Climate Action in the Global South: Are Brazilian Cities Considering Climate Emergency in Local Planning Practice?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-31, September.
    5. Pettersson, Annelie I. & Segerstedt, Anders, 2013. "Measuring supply chain cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 357-363.
    6. Friederike Neugebauer & Frank Figge & Tobias Hahn, 2016. "Planned or Emergent Strategy Making? Exploring the Formation of Corporate Sustainability Strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(5), pages 323-336, July.
    7. Gunasekaran, A. & Patel, C. & McGaughey, Ronald E., 2004. "A framework for supply chain performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 333-347, February.
    8. Tan Yigitcanlar & Ingi Runar Edvardsson & Hjalti Johannesson & Md Kamruzzaman & Giuseppe Ioppolo & Surabhi Pancholi, 2017. "Knowledge-based development dynamics in less favoured regions: insights from Australian and Icelandic university towns," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(12), pages 2272-2292, December.
    9. Khor, Kuan Siew & Udin, Zulkifli Mohamed & Ramayah, Thurasamy & Hazen, Benjamin T., 2016. "Reverse logistics in Malaysia: The Contingent role of institutional pressure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 96-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ramanathan, Usha & He, Qile & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Sarpong, David, 2023. "Collaborative closed-loop supply chain framework for sustainable manufacturing: Evidence from the Indian packaging industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Madduma Kaluge Chamitha Sanjani Wijewickrama & Nicholas Chileshe & Raufdeen Rameezdeen & Jose Jorge Ochoa, 2022. "Information Processing for Quality Assurance in Reverse Logistics Supply Chains: An Organizational Information Processing Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-31, May.
    3. Madduma Kaluge Chamitha Sanjani Wijewickrama & Nicholas Chileshe & Raufdeen Rameezdeen & Jose Jorge Ochoa, 2021. "Minimizing Macro-Level Uncertainties for Quality Assurance in Reverse Logistics Supply Chains of Demolition Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-35, November.
    4. Chamari Pamoshika Jayarathna & Duzgun Agdas & Les Dawes, 2024. "Viability of sustainable logistics practices enabling circular economy: A system dynamics approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3422-3439, May.
    5. Özden Özkanlısoy & Füsun Bulutlar, 2023. "Measuring Supply Chain Performance as SCOR v13.0-Based in Disruptive Technology Era: Scale Development and Validation," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-35, September.
    6. Cristina Ciliberto & Katarzyna Szopik‐Depczyńska & Małgorzata Tarczyńska‐Łuniewska & Alessandro Ruggieri & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2021. "Enabling the Circular Economy transition: a sustainable lean manufacturing recipe for Industry 4.0," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3255-3272, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jędrzej Charłampowicz, 2018. "Supply Chain Efficiency On The Maritime Container Shipping Markets – Selected Issues," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 18, pages 357-368.
    2. Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi, 2022. "Evaluating and Prioritizing the Enablers of Supply Chain Performance Management System (SCPMS) for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2019. "Predicting supply chain performance based on SCOR® metrics and multilayer perceptron neural networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 19-38.
    4. Zhao, Nanyang & Hong, Jiangtao & Lau, Kwok Hung, 2023. "Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    5. Heidary-Dahooie, Jalil & Rafiee, Mostafa & Mohammadi, Mehdi & Meidute-Kavaliauskienė, Ieva, 2022. "Proposing a new LSGDM framework based on BWM with hesitant fuzzy information for prioritizing blockchain adoption barriers in supply chain," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Iain J. Fraser & Martin Müller & Julia Schwarzkopf, 2020. "Transparency for Multi-Tier Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Case Study of a Multi-tier Transparency Approach for SSCM in the Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Chand, Pushpendu & Thakkar, Jitesh J. & Ghosh, Kunal Kanti, 2020. "Analysis of supply chain performance metrics for Indian mining & earthmoving equipment manufacturing companies using hybrid MCDM model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Hald, Kim Sundtoft & Mouritsen, Jan, 2018. "The evolution of performance measurement systems in a supply chain: A longitudinal case study on the role of interorganisational factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 256-271.
    9. Maestrini, Vieri & Luzzini, Davide & Maccarrone, Paolo & Caniato, Federico, 2017. "Supply chain performance measurement systems: A systematic review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 299-315.
    10. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chains with Blockchain, IoT and RFID: A Simulation on Order Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Wang, Binni & Wang, Pong & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Customer satisfaction service match and service quality-based blockchain cloud manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    12. Kumar, V.N.S.A. & Kumar, V. & Brady, M. & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Simpson, M., 2017. "Resolving forward-reverse logistics multi-period model using evolutionary algorithms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 458-469.
    13. Siti Aisyah Ya?kob & Mohd Uzairi Ahmad Hajazi & Nor Afiza Abu Bakar & Sharizal Hashim, 2019. "The Influence of Information Sharing Linkages on Business Performance: Evidence from Micro and Small Enterprises in Sarawak," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 18-26, January.
    14. Schneider, Christian O. & Bremen, Philipp & Schönsleben, Paul & Alard, Robert, 2013. "Transaction cost economics in global sourcing: Assessing regional differences and implications for performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 243-254.
    15. Ulpan Tokkozhina & Ana Lucia Martins & Joao C. Ferreira, 2023. "Multi-tier supply chain behavior with blockchain technology: evidence from a frozen fish supply chain," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1562-1576, September.
    16. Su, Dan & Zhang, Lijun & Peng, Hua & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2023. "Technical challenges of blockchain technology for sustainable manufacturing paradigm in Industry 4.0 era using a fuzzy decision support system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    17. Ogulin, R. & Selen, W. & Ashayeri, J., 2010. "Determinants of Informal Coordination in Networked Supply Chains," Discussion Paper 2010-133, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    18. Maurizio Massaro & Francesca Dal Mas & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Carlo Bagnoli, 2020. "Crypto‐economy and new sustainable business models: Reflections and projections using a case study analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2150-2160, September.
    19. Kroes, James R. & Manikas, Andrew S. & Gattiker, Thomas F., 2018. "Operational leanness and retail firm performance since 1980," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 262-274.
    20. Yuemei Ding & Dequan Zheng & Xiaoyu Niu, 2023. "Collaborative Green Innovation of Livestock Product Three-Level Supply Chain Traceability System: A Value Co-Creation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-28, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:60-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.