IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v637y2024ics0378437124000761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extortion evolutionary game on scale-free networks with tunable clustering

Author

Listed:
  • Shen, Aizhong
  • Gao, Zili
  • Cui, Dan
  • Gu, Chen

Abstract

In this paper, we study the evolution of extortion with cooperation and defection strategies on scale-free networks with a tunable value of clustering under the normalized payoff framework. We investigate the influence of the clustering coefficient on cooperation behaviors based on the Prisoner’s Dilemma game with a single parameter. We simulate the evolution of cooperation with different extortion factors. For the smaller value of extortion factor, the result shows that the higher clustering coefficient is conducive to the spread of cooperation behaviors among small-degree and middle-degree nodes, which can maintain cooperation behaviors on the networks. However, for the larger value of extortion factor, the lower clustering coefficient can support cooperators invade into defectors and extortioners for all nodes. In addition, extortion strategies can act as catalysts to promote the frequencies of cooperation compared to the two-strategy game. These results are more significant for the smaller value of the benefit factor. Moreover, there exists an optimal value of the extortion factor to promote cooperation behaviors for different clustering coefficients.

Suggested Citation

  • Shen, Aizhong & Gao, Zili & Cui, Dan & Gu, Chen, 2024. "Extortion evolutionary game on scale-free networks with tunable clustering," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 637(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:637:y:2024:i:c:s0378437124000761
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2024.129568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437124000761
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2024.129568?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Zhixue & Geng, Yini & Shen, Chen & Shi, Lei, 2020. "Evolution of cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game with extortion strategy under win-stay-lose-move rule," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Cooper, Russell & DeJong, Douglas V. & Forsythe, Robert & Ross, Thomas W., 1996. "Cooperation without Reputation: Experimental Evidence from Prisoner's Dilemma Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 187-218, February.
    3. Christoph Hauert & Michael Doebeli, 2004. "Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 643-646, April.
    4. Zhi-Hai Rong & Qian Zhao & Zhi-Xi Wu & Tao Zhou & Chi Kong Tse, 2016. "Proper aspiration level promotes generous behavior in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 89(7), pages 1-7, July.
    5. Ai Zhong Shen & Xiang Gao & Xiao Ping Wang & Shaojian Qu, 2021. "Optimal Administrative Response to Selfish Behaviors in Urban Public Management: The Role of Zero-Determinant Strategies," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-10, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hao, Weijuan & Hu, Yuhan, 2024. "The implications of deep cooperation strategy for the evolution of cooperation in social dilemmas," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 470(C).
    2. Zhang, Lulu & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng, 2022. "The influence of donation behavior on the evolution of cooperation in social dilemma," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Wang, Si-Yi & Liu, Yan-Ping & Zhang, Feng & Wang, Rui-Wu, 2021. "Super-rational aspiration induced strategy updating promotes cooperation in the asymmetric prisoner's dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 403(C).
    4. Li, Cong & Xu, Hedong & Fan, Suohai, 2020. "Synergistic effects of self-optimization and imitation rules on the evolution of cooperation in the investor sharing game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    5. Markus C. Arnold & Eva Ponick, 2006. "Kommunikation im Groves-Mechanismus — Ergebnisse eines Laborexperiments," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 89-120, February.
    6. Giuseppe Attanasi & Aurora García-Gallego & Nikolaos Georgantzís & Aldo Montesano, 2015. "Bargaining over Strategies of Non-Cooperative Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-26, August.
    7. Sergio Currarini & Carmen Marchiori & Alessandro Tavoni, 2016. "Network Economics and the Environment: Insights and Perspectives," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(1), pages 159-189, September.
    8. Christian Hilbe & Moshe Hoffman & Martin A. Nowak, 2015. "Cooperate without Looking in a Non-Repeated Game," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Takahara, Akihiro & Sakiyama, Tomoko, 2023. "Twisted strategy may enhance the evolution of cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 629(C).
    10. Te Wu & Feng Fu & Long Wang, 2011. "Moving Away from Nasty Encounters Enhances Cooperation in Ecological Prisoner's Dilemma Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-7, November.
    11. Kenju Kamei & Louis Putterman, 2018. "Reputation Transmission Without Benefit To The Reporter: A Behavioral Underpinning Of Markets In Experimental Focus," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(1), pages 158-172, January.
    12. Volker Benndorf & Thomas Große Brinkhaus & Ferdinand von Siemens, 2021. "Ultimatum Game Behavior in a Social-Preferences Vacuum Chamber," CESifo Working Paper Series 9280, CESifo.
    13. Jorge Peña & Yannick Rochat, 2012. "Bipartite Graphs as Models of Population Structures in Evolutionary Multiplayer Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
    14. Vital Anderhub & Werner Güth & Ulrich Kamecke & Hans-Theo Normann, 2003. "Capacity Choices and Price Competition in Experimental Markets," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 6(1), pages 27-52, June.
    15. Urs Fischbacher & Simon Gaechter, 2008. "Heterogeneous Social Preferences And The Dynamics Of Free Riding In Public Good Experiments," Discussion Papers 2008-07, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    16. Sahoo, Debgopal & Samanta, Guruprasad, 2023. "Modeling cooperative evolution in prey species using the snowdrift game with evolutionary impact on prey–predator dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    17. Yunsheng Deng & Jihui Zhang, 2022. "The choice-decision based on memory and payoff favors cooperation in stag hunt game on interdependent networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 95(2), pages 1-13, February.
    18. Liang, Rizhou & Zhang, Jiqiang & Zheng, Guozhong & Chen, Li, 2021. "Social hierarchy promotes the cooperation prevalence," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 567(C).
    19. Urs Fischbacher & Simon Gachter, 2010. "Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 541-556, March.
    20. Ping Zhu & Guiyi Wei, 2014. "Stochastic Heterogeneous Interaction Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-10, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:637:y:2024:i:c:s0378437124000761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.