IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v633y2024ics0378437123009500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using pedestrian modelling to inform virus transmission mitigation policies: A novel activity scheduling model to enable virus transmission risk assessment in a restaurant environment

Author

Listed:
  • Sparnaaij, Martijn
  • Yuan, Yufei
  • Daamen, Winnie
  • Duives, Dorine C.

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has had a large impact on the world. The virus spreads especially easily among people in indoor spaces such as restaurants. Hence, tools that can assess how different restaurant settings can impact the potential spread of an airborne virus and that can assess the effectiveness of mitigation policies are of high value. Microscopic pedestrian models provide the tools necessary to assess the detailed movements of people in a restaurant and with that the risk of virus transmission. This paper presents the application of a microscopic pedestrian model, including a novel activity choice and scheduling model, to assess virus transmission risks in restaurants. Simulation experiments identify that different factors impact virus transmission risks in a restaurant. Contacts between restaurant staff and customers are the driving factor for virus transmission in a restaurant whereby especially staff presents a big risk. Hence, mitigation policies focussing on these interactions and on preventing staff from transmitting the virus can be highly effective. The results also show that different restaurant layouts and setups lead to distinctly different transmission risks. Therefore, insights obtained from simulating one restaurant cannot be just transferred to any other restaurant. Together, these results show the added value of including pedestrian models in disease transmission risk modelling exercises to mitigate the impact of a pandemic caused by an airborne virus. However, the research also shows that, to better utilize the potential of pedestrian models for disease transmission risk modelling, future research of pedestrian activity scheduling behaviour in indoor spaces is necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Sparnaaij, Martijn & Yuan, Yufei & Daamen, Winnie & Duives, Dorine C., 2024. "Using pedestrian modelling to inform virus transmission mitigation policies: A novel activity scheduling model to enable virus transmission risk assessment in a restaurant environment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 633(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:633:y:2024:i:c:s0378437123009500
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2023.129395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437123009500
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2023.129395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaitano Dube & Godwell Nhamo & David Chikodzi, 2021. "COVID-19 cripples global restaurant and hospitality industry," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(11), pages 1487-1490, June.
    2. Xiao, Yao & Yang, Mofeng & Zhu, Zheng & Yang, Hai & Zhang, Lei & Ghader, Sepehr, 2021. "Modeling indoor-level non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A pedestrian dynamics-based microscopic simulation approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 12-23.
    3. Timmermans, Harry & van der Hagen, Xavier & Borgers, Aloys, 1992. "Transportation systems, retail environments and pedestrian trip chaining behaviour: Modelling issues and applications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 45-59, February.
    4. Wei Zhu & Harry Timmermans, 2011. "Modeling pedestrian shopping behavior using principles of bounded rationality: model comparison and validation," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 101-126, June.
    5. Abel Brodeur & David Gray & Anik Islam & Suraiya Bhuiyan, 2021. "A literature review of the economics of COVID‐19," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1007-1044, September.
    6. Hoogendoorn, S. P. & Bovy, P. H. L., 2004. "Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 169-190, February.
    7. Qiancheng Xu & Mohcine Chraibi, 2020. "On the Effectiveness of the Measures in Supermarkets for Reducing Contact among Customers during COVID-19 Period," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Peter E. Rossi, 2014. "Bayesian Non- and Semi-parametric Methods and Applications," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10259.
    9. Christine S.M. Currie & John W. Fowler & Kathy Kotiadis & Thomas Monks & Bhakti Stephan Onggo & Duncan A. Robertson & Antuela A. Tako, 2020. "How simulation modelling can help reduce the impact of COVID-19," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 83-97, April.
    10. Alexey A Tsukanov & Alexandra M Senjkevich & Maxim V Fedorov & Nikolai V Brilliantov, 2021. "How risky is it to visit a supermarket during the pandemic?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danalet, Antonin & Tinguely, Loïc & Lapparent, Matthieu de & Bierlaire, Michel, 2016. "Location choice with longitudinal WiFi data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 1-17.
    2. Cui, Hongjun & Xie, Jinping & Zhu, Minqing & Tian, Xiaoyong & Wan, Ce, 2022. "Virus transmission risk of college students in railway station during Post-COVID-19 era: Combining the social force model and the virus transmission model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 608(P1).
    3. Canca, David & Zarzo, Alejandro & Algaba, Encarnación & Barrena, Eva, 2013. "Macroscopic attraction-based simulation of pedestrian mobility: A dynamic individual route-choice approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 428-442.
    4. Shatu, Farjana & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Bunker, Jonathan, 2019. "Shortest path distance vs. least directional change: Empirical testing of space syntax and geographic theories concerning pedestrian route choice behaviour," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 37-52.
    5. Shatu, Farjana & Yigitcanlar, Tan, 2018. "Development and validity of a virtual street walkability audit tool for pedestrian route choice analysis—SWATCH," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 148-160.
    6. Iza Gigauri & Mirela Panait & Simona Andreea Apostu & Lukman Raimi, 2022. "The Essence of Social Entrepreneurship through a Georgian Lens: Social Entrepreneurs’ Perspectives," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Phurichai Rungcharoenkitkul, 2021. "Macroeconomic effects of COVID‐19: A mid‐term review," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 439-458, October.
    8. Brodeur, Abel & Clark, Andrew E. & Fleche, Sarah & Powdthavee, Nattavudh, 2021. "COVID-19, lockdowns and well-being: Evidence from Google Trends," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Borisova, Ekaterina & Gründler, Klaus & Hackenberger, Armin & Harter, Anina & Potrafke, Niklas & Schoors, Koen, 2023. "Crisis experience and the deep roots of COVID-19 vaccination preferences," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    10. Kahanec, Martin & Lafférs, Lukáš & Schmidpeter, Bernhard, 2021. "The Impact of Mass Antigen Testing for COVID-19 on the Prevalence of the Disease," GLO Discussion Paper Series 775, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    11. Lalinsky, Tibor & Pál, Rozália, 2022. "Distribution of COVID-19 government support and its consequences for firm liquidity and solvency," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 305-335.
    12. Wolter H. J. Hassink & Guyonne Kalb & Jordy Meekes, 2020. "The Dutch labour market early on in the COVID-19 outbreak: Regional coronavirus hotspots and the national lockdown," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2020n17, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    13. Laura Liu & Hyungsik Roger Moon & Frank Schorfheide, 2023. "Forecasting with a panel Tobit model," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(1), pages 117-159, January.
    14. Di Bartolomeo, Giovanni & D'Imperio, Paolo & Felici, Francesco, 2022. "The fiscal response to the Italian COVID-19 crisis: A counterfactual analysis," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    15. Xianing Wang & Zhan Zhang & Ying Wang & Jun Yang & Linjun Lu, 2022. "A Study on Safety Evaluation of Pedestrian Flows Based on Partial Impact Dynamics by Real-Time Data in Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Olivier Chanel, 2022. "Impact of COVID‑19 Activity Restrictions on Air Pollution: Methodological Considerations in the Economic Valuation of the Long‑Term Effects on Mortality [Impact sur la pollution de l’air des restri," Working Papers hal-03778336, HAL.
    17. Joohyun Lee & Mardelle McCuskey Shepley, 2020. "College Campuses and Student Walkability: Assessing the Impact of Smartphone Use on Student Perception and Evaluation of Urban Campus Routes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Tomasz Antczak & Bartosz Skorupa & Mikolaj Szurlej & Rafal Weron & Jacek Zabawa, 2021. "Simulation modeling of epidemic risk in supermarkets: Investigating the impact of social distancing and checkout zone design," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/21/05, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    19. Jie Xu & Yao Ning & Heng Wei & Wei Xie & Jianyuan Guo & Limin Jia & Yong Qin, 2015. "Route Choice in Subway Station during Morning Peak Hours: A Case of Guangzhou Subway," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-8, March.
    20. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:633:y:2024:i:c:s0378437123009500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.