IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v439y2015icp59-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heuristics guide cooperative behaviors in public goods game

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yongjie
  • Chen, Tong

Abstract

In public goods game (PGG), player’s cooperative behavior is not pure economical rationality, but social preference and prosocial intuition play extremely important roles as well. Social preference and prosocial intuition can be guided by heuristics from one’s neighbors in daily life. To better investigate the impacts of heuristics on the evolution of cooperation, four types of agents are introduced into our spatial PGG. Through numerical simulations, results show that the larger percentages of cooperators with independent thought, the easier emergence and maintenance of collective cooperative behaviors. Additionally, we find that differentia heuristic capability has great effect on the equilibrium of PGG. Cooperation can be obviously promoted, when heuristic capability of cooperators with independent thought is stronger than that of defectors with independent thought. Finally, we observe that cooperators with independent thought and defectors with independent thought are favorable for the formation of some high quality clusters, which can resist the invasion between each other. Our work may help us understand more clearly the mechanism of cooperation in real world.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yongjie & Chen, Tong, 2015. "Heuristics guide cooperative behaviors in public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 439(C), pages 59-65.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:439:y:2015:i:c:p:59-65
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.07.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037843711500641X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2015.07.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Charness & Matthew Rabin, 2002. "Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(3), pages 817-869.
    2. David K. Levine, 1998. "Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiment," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 1(3), pages 593-622, July.
    3. Matthias Greiff, 2013. "Rewards and the private provision of public goods on dynamic networks," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1001-1021, November.
    4. Hang Ye & Fei Tan & Mei Ding & Yongmin Jia & Yefeng Chen, 2011. "Sympathy and Punishment: Evolution of Cooperation in Public Goods Game," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20.
    5. David G. Rand & Joshua D. Greene & Martin A. Nowak, 2012. "Spontaneous giving and calculated greed," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7416), pages 427-430, September.
    6. Francisco C. Santos & Marta D. Santos & Jorge M. Pacheco, 2008. "Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7201), pages 213-216, July.
    7. Urs Fischbacher & Simon Gachter, 2010. "Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 541-556, March.
    8. Zhu, Cheng-jie & Sun, Shi-wen & Wang, Li & Ding, Shuai & Wang, Juan & Xia, Cheng-yi, 2014. "Promotion of cooperation due to diversity of players in the spatial public goods game with increasing neighborhood size," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 406(C), pages 145-154.
    9. Axel Ockenfels & Gary E. Bolton, 2000. "ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(1), pages 166-193, March.
    10. Liu, Run-Ran & Jia, Chun-Xiao & Wang, Bing-Hong, 2010. "Heritability promotes cooperation in spatial public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(24), pages 5719-5724.
    11. Rand, David Gertler & Dreber, Anna & Fudenberg, Drew & Ellingson, Tore & Nowak, Martin A., 2009. "Positive Interactions Promote Public Cooperation," Scholarly Articles 3804483, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    12. Chen, Mei-huan & Wang, Li & Wang, Juan & Sun, Shi-wen & Xia, Cheng-yi, 2015. "Impact of individual response strategy on the spatial public goods game within mobile agents," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 192-202.
    13. Oliver P. Hauser & David G. Rand & Alexander Peysakhovich & Martin A. Nowak, 2014. "Cooperating with the future," Nature, Nature, vol. 511(7508), pages 220-223, July.
    14. Wu, Te & Fu, Feng & Dou, Puxuan & Wang, Long, 2014. "Social influence promotes cooperation in the public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 413(C), pages 86-93.
    15. Simon Gachter & Ernst Fehr, 2000. "Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(4), pages 980-994, September.
    16. Gao, Jia & Li, Zhi & Wu, Te & Wang, Long, 2010. "Diversity of contribution promotes cooperation in public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(16), pages 3166-3171.
    17. Zhang, Haifeng & Shi, Dongmei & Liu, Runran & Wang, Binghong, 2012. "Dynamic allocation of investments promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(8), pages 2617-2622.
    18. Li, Ming & Jia, Chun-Xiao & Liu, Run-Ran & Wang, Bing-Hong, 2013. "Emergence of cooperation in spatial public goods game with conditional participation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(8), pages 1840-1847.
    19. David G. Rand & Alexander Peysakhovich & Gordon T. Kraft-Todd & George E. Newman & Owen Wurzbacher & Martin A. Nowak & Joshua D. Greene, 2014. "Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, May.
    20. Yang, Zhihu & Li, Zhi & Wu, Te & Wang, Long, 2013. "Role of recommendation in spatial public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(9), pages 2038-2045.
    21. Teng, Xian & Yan, Shu & Tang, Shaoting & Pei, Sen & Li, Weihua & Zheng, Zhiming, 2014. "Individual behavior and social wealth in the spatial public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 402(C), pages 141-149.
    22. David G. Rand & Martin A. Nowak, 2011. "The evolution of antisocial punishment in optional public goods games," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 2(1), pages 1-7, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Yang, Ran, 2019. "Using rewards reasonably: The effects of stratified-rewards in public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 67-74.
    2. Wang, Yongjie & Chen, Tong & Chen, Qiao & Si, Guangrun, 2017. "Emotional decisions in structured populations for the evolution of public cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 475-481.
    3. Wang, Le & Chen, Tong & You, Xinshang & Wang, Yongjie, 2018. "The effect of wealth-based anti-expectation behaviors on public cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 493(C), pages 84-93.
    4. Quan, Ji & Yang, Xiukang & Wang, Xianjia, 2018. "Spatial public goods game with continuous contributions based on Particle Swarm Optimization learning and the evolution of cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 973-983.
    5. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2016. "How the expanded crowd-funding mechanism of some southern rural areas in China affects cooperative behaviors in threshold public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 649-655.
    6. Yang, Ran & Chen, Tong & Chen, Qiao, 2018. "The impact of lotteries on cooperation in the public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 925-934.
    7. Zhang, Zaisheng & Song, Fang & Song, Zongbin, 2020. "Promoting knowledge sharing in the workplace: Punishment v. reward," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2017. "Publishing the donation list incompletely promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 310(C), pages 48-56.
    9. Wang, Yongjie & Yao, Zhouzhou & Wang, Chao & Ren, Jiale & Chen, Qiao, 2020. "The impact of intelligent transportation points system based on Elo rating on emergence of cooperation at Y intersection," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    10. Sun, Qipeng & Liu, Hang & Wang, Yongjie & Li, Qiong & Chen, Wenqiang & Bai, Pengxia & Xue, Chenlei, 2022. "Cooperation in the jaywalking dilemma of a road public good due to points guidance," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    11. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2019. "Cleverly handling the donation information can promote cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 363-373.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yongjie & Chen, Tong & Chen, Qiao & Si, Guangrun, 2017. "Emotional decisions in structured populations for the evolution of public cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 475-481.
    2. Alexander Peysakhovich & David G. Rand, 2016. "Habits of Virtue: Creating Norms of Cooperation and Defection in the Laboratory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 631-647, March.
    3. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Imitating winner or sympathizing loser? Quadratic effects on cooperative behavior in prisoners’ dilemma games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 327-337.
    4. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Individual choice and reputation distribution of cooperative behaviors among heterogeneous groups," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 39-46.
    5. Kurt A. Ackermann & Ryan O. Murphy, 2019. "Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels," Games, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, March.
    6. Shuhua Chang & Zhipeng Zhang & Yu Li & Yu E Wu & Yunya Xie, 2018. "Investment preference promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Quan, Ji & Yu, Junyu & Li, Xia & Wang, Xianjia, 2023. "Conditional switching between social excluders and loners promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Wang, Qun & Wang, Hanchen & Zhang, Zhuxi & Li, Yumeng & Liu, Yu & Perc, Matjaž, 2018. "Heterogeneous investments promote cooperation in evolutionary public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 502(C), pages 570-575.
    9. Karakostas, Alexandros & Kocher, Martin G. & Matzat, Dominik & Rau, Holger A. & Riewe, Gerhard, 2023. "The team allocator game: Allocation power in public goods games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 73-87.
    10. Reuben, Ernesto & Riedl, Arno, 2013. "Enforcement of contribution norms in public good games with heterogeneous populations," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 122-137.
    11. Felix Koelle & Thomas Lauer, 2018. "Cooperation, Discounting, and the Effects of Delayed Costs and Benefits," Discussion Papers 2018-10, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    12. Simon Gaechter, 2014. "Human Pro-Social Motivation and the Maintenance of Social Order," Discussion Papers 2014-02, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    13. Wang, Le & Chen, Tong & You, Xinshang & Wang, Yongjie, 2018. "The effect of wealth-based anti-expectation behaviors on public cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 493(C), pages 84-93.
    14. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Learn good from bad: Effects of good and bad neighbors in spatial prisoners’ dilemma games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 351-358.
    15. Christian Hilbe & Moshe Hoffman & Martin A. Nowak, 2015. "Cooperate without Looking in a Non-Repeated Game," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-15, September.
    16. Fan, Ruguo & Zhang, Yingqing & Luo, Ming & Zhang, Hongjuan, 2017. "Promotion of cooperation induced by heterogeneity of both investment and payoff allocation in spatial public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 454-463.
    17. Lu, Peng & Wang, Fang, 2015. "Heterogeneity of inferring reputation probability in cooperative behaviors for the spatial prisoners’ dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 433(C), pages 367-378.
    18. Bault, Nadège & Fahrenfort, Johannes J. & Pelloux, Benjamin & Ridderinkhof, K. Richard & van Winden, Frans, 2017. "An affective social tie mechanism: Theory, evidence, and implications," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 152-175.
    19. Manapat, Michael L. & Nowak, Martin A. & Rand, David G., 2013. "Information, irrationality, and the evolution of trust," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 90(S), pages 57-75.
    20. Fluet, Claude & Galbiati, Rpbertp, 2016. "Lois et normes : les enseignements de l'économie comportementale," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 92(1-2), pages 191-215, Mars-Juin.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:439:y:2015:i:c:p:59-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.