IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v186y2021icp136-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Treating nonresponse in the estimation of the distribution function

Author

Listed:
  • Rueda, M.
  • Martínez, S.
  • Illescas, M.

Abstract

The estimation of a finite population distribution function is considered when there are missing data. Calibration adjustment is used for dealing with nonresponse at the estimation stage. Several procedures are proposed and compared. A numerical study is carried out to evaluate the performances of estimators. Computational problems with the implementation of the proposed calibration estimators are also considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Rueda, M. & Martínez, S. & Illescas, M., 2021. "Treating nonresponse in the estimation of the distribution function," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 136-144.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:186:y:2021:i:c:p:136-144
    DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2020.07.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475420303244
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.matcom.2020.07.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean‐François Beaumont, 2005. "Calibrated imputation in surveys under a quasi‐model‐assisted approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(3), pages 445-458, June.
    2. Éric Lesage & David Haziza & Xavier D’Haultfœuille, 2019. "A Cautionary Tale on Instrumental Calibration for the Treatment of Nonignorable Unit Nonresponse in Surveys," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(526), pages 906-915, April.
    3. Ted Chang & Phillip S. Kott, 2008. "Using calibration weighting to adjust for nonresponse under a plausible model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(3), pages 555-571.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María del Mar Rueda & Sergio Martínez-Puertas & Luis Castro-Martín, 2022. "Methods to Counter Self-Selection Bias in Estimations of the Distribution Function and Quantiles," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denis Devaud & Yves Tillé, 2019. "Deville and Särndal’s calibration: revisiting a 25-years-old successful optimization problem," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(4), pages 1033-1065, December.
    2. M. Giovanna Ranalli & Alina Matei & Andrea Neri, 2023. "Generalised calibration with latent variables for the treatment of unit nonresponse in sample surveys," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(1), pages 169-195, March.
    3. Denis Devaud & Yves Tillé, 2019. "Rejoinder on: Deville and Särndal’s calibration: revisiting a 25-year-old successful optimization problem," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(4), pages 1087-1091, December.
    4. Jiang, Depeng & Zhao, Puying & Tang, Niansheng, 2016. "A propensity score adjustment method for regression models with nonignorable missing covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 98-119.
    5. Alexandra Filindra & Melanie Kolbe, 2022. "Latinx identification with whiteness: What drives it, and what effects does it have on political preferences?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(6), pages 1424-1439, November.
    6. Kott Phillip S. & Liao Dan, 2018. "Calibration Weighting for Nonresponse with Proxy Frame Variables (So that Unit Nonresponse Can Be Not Missing at Random)," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 34(1), pages 107-120, March.
    7. Xiaojun Mao & Zhonglei Wang & Shu Yang, 2023. "Matrix completion under complex survey sampling," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 75(3), pages 463-492, June.
    8. Christopher Foote & Tyler Hounshell & William D. Nordhaus & Douglas Rivers & Pamela Torola, 2021. "Measuring the U.S. Employment Situation Using Online Panels: The Yale Labor Survey," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2282, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    9. Chipperfield James & Brown James & Bell Philip, 2017. "Estimating the Count Error in the Australian Census," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(1), pages 43-59, March.
    10. Gonzalez Jeffrey M. & Eltinge John L., 2016. "Discussion," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 32(2), pages 295-300, June.
    11. Christopher Henry & Kim Huynh & Gradon Nicholls & Mitchell Nicholson, 2019. "2018 Bitcoin Omnibus Survey: Awareness and Usage," Discussion Papers 2019-10, Bank of Canada.
    12. Särndal Carl-Erik & Traat Imbi & Lumiste Kaur, 2018. "Interaction Between Data Collection And Estimation Phases In Surveys With Nonresponse," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 19(2), pages 183-200, June.
    13. Christopher Foote & William D. Nordhaus & Douglas Rivers, 2020. "The US Employment Situation Using the Yale Labor Survey," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2243, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    14. Damião N. Da Silva & Li‐Chun Zhang, 2021. "A calibrated imputation method for secondary data analysis of survey data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(1), pages 25-41, March.
    15. Puying Zhao & Hui Zhao & Niansheng Tang & Zhaohai Li, 2017. "Weighted composite quantile regression analysis for nonignorable missing data using nonresponse instrument," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 189-212, April.
    16. Hamori, Shigeyuki & Motegi, Kaiji & Zhang, Zheng, 2019. "Calibration estimation of semiparametric copula models with data missing at random," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 85-109.
    17. Maria Michela Dickson & Giuseppe Espa & Lorenzo Fattorini & Flavio Santi, 2022. "Double-calibration estimators accounting for under-coverage and nonresponse in socio-economic surveys," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(5), pages 1273-1288, December.
    18. Pengfei Li & Jing Qin & Yukun Liu, 2023. "Instability of inverse probability weighting methods and a remedy for nonignorable missing data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3215-3226, December.
    19. L. Castell & P. Sillard, 2021. "Le traitement du biais de sélection endogène dans les enquêtes auprès des ménages par modèle de Heckman," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers m2021-02, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
    20. Williams Matthew & Berg Emily, 2013. "Incorporating User Input Into Optimal Constraining Procedures for Survey Estimates," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 29(3), pages 375-396, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:186:y:2021:i:c:p:136-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.