IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v127y2016icp101-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency of exponential time differencing schemes for nonlinear Schrödinger equations

Author

Listed:
  • Hederi, M.
  • Islas, A.L.
  • Reger, K.
  • Schober, C.M.

Abstract

The nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation and its higher order extension (HONLS equation) are used extensively in modeling various phenomena in nonlinear optics and wave mechanics. Fast and accurate nonlinear numerical techniques are needed for further analysis of these models. In this paper, we compare the efficiency of existing Fourier split-step versus exponential time differencing methods in solving the NLS and HONLS equations. Soliton, Stokes wave, large amplitude multiple mode breather, and N-phase solution initial data are considered. To determine the computational efficiency we determine the minimum CPU time required for a given scheme to achieve a specified accuracy in the solution u(x, t) (when an analytical solution is available for comparison) or in one of the associated invariants of the system. Numerical simulations of both the NLS and HONLS equations show that for the initial data considered, the exponential time differencing scheme is computationally more efficient than the Fourier split-step method. Depending on the error measure used, the exponential scheme can be an order of magnitude more efficient than the split-step method.

Suggested Citation

  • Hederi, M. & Islas, A.L. & Reger, K. & Schober, C.M., 2016. "Efficiency of exponential time differencing schemes for nonlinear Schrödinger equations," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 101-113.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:127:y:2016:i:c:p:101-113
    DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2013.05.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475413001572
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.matcom.2013.05.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muslu, G.M. & Erbay, H.A., 2005. "Higher-order split-step Fourier schemes for the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 581-595.
    2. Zhenya Yan, 2009. "Financial rogue waves," Papers 0911.4259, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2010.
    3. Ablowitz, M.J. & Herbst, B.M. & Schober, C.M., 1996. "Computational chaos in the nonlinear Schrödinger equation without homoclinic crossings," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 212-235.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vyacheslav Trofimov & Maria Loginova, 2021. "Conservative Finite-Difference Schemes for Two Nonlinear Schrödinger Equations Describing Frequency Tripling in a Medium with Cubic Nonlinearity: Competition of Invariants," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-26, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natanael Karjanto, 2024. "Modeling Wave Packet Dynamics and Exploring Applications: A Comprehensive Guide to the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-32, March.
    2. Raviola, Lisandro A. & De Leo, Mariano F., 2024. "Performance of affine-splitting pseudo-spectral methods for fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equations," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    3. Bo Ren & Ji Lin & Zhi-Mei Lou, 2019. "A New Nonlinear Equation with Lump-Soliton, Lump-Periodic, and Lump-Periodic-Soliton Solutions," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-10, June.
    4. Ismail, M.S., 2008. "Numerical solution of coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equation by Galerkin method," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 78(4), pages 532-547.
    5. Zhonglong Zhao & Lingchao He & Yubin Gao, 2019. "Rogue Wave and Multiple Lump Solutions of the (2+1)-Dimensional Benjamin-Ono Equation in Fluid Mechanics," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-18, August.
    6. Mattheakis, M. & Pitsios, I.J. & Tsironis, G.P. & Tzortzakis, S., 2016. "Extreme events in complex linear and nonlinear photonic media," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 73-80.
    7. Borluk, H. & Muslu, G.M. & Erbay, H.A., 2007. "A numerical study of the long wave–short wave interaction equations," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 113-125.
    8. Korabel, Nickolay & Zaslavsky, George M., 2007. "Transition to chaos in discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation with long-range interaction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 378(2), pages 223-237.
    9. Calini, Annalisa M. & Ivey, Thomas A., 2001. "Knot types, Floquet spectra, and finite-gap solutions of the vortex filament equation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 341-350.
    10. Yuan, Cuilian & Yang, Hujiang & Meng, Xiankui & Tian, Ye & Zhou, Qin & Liu, Wenjun, 2023. "Modulational instability and discrete rogue waves with adjustable positions for a two-component higher-order Ablowitz–Ladik system associated with 4 × 4 Lax pair," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Liu, Yindi & Zhao, Zhonglong, 2024. "Periodic line wave, rogue waves and the interaction solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional integrable Kadomtsev–Petviashvili-based system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:127:y:2016:i:c:p:101-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.