IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v99y2020ics0264837720301344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A model to support the decision-making in urban regeneration

Author

Listed:
  • Manganelli, Benedetto
  • Tataranna, Sabina
  • Pontrandolfi, Piergiuseppe

Abstract

Urban regeneration represents an opportunity for sustainable development and smart growth of towns. The European best practices of urban regeneration demonstrate its effectiveness to valorize obsolete existing buildings, through integrated design of energy and structural upgrade. In countries of southern Europe, characterized by medium to high seismic risk, programs of urban regeneration, would make it possible to reduce buildings vulnerability, through seismic upgrade/retrofit interventions, or alternatively, through demolition and reconstruction interventions, when the previous ones do not allow the improvement of seismic performance of building structures in order to ensure adequate levels of safety. The research work sets out a real case for a possible process of urban regeneration, of a residential neighborhood located in the city of Matera, through demolition of existing buildings and then their reconstruction in the same volume size or, eventually, increased in relation to the premiums of volume required by current regulations. The process involves three different categories of stakeholders: residents, public sector and private investor responsible for executing and financing of the entire processing. Each of them with different and contrasting needs. At the end of the process, the new surfaces should be redistributed between residents and private investor. These shares, with the volumetric premium, constitute the unknown variables of the problem and, their possible combinations represent the different possible options of intervention. The problem is solved through the construction of the model based on the objective functions, expressed by utility functions, defined for each stakeholder. The search for the optimum solution, which is able to balance the different utilities, is carried out with Multi-objective linear programming.

Suggested Citation

  • Manganelli, Benedetto & Tataranna, Sabina & Pontrandolfi, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "A model to support the decision-making in urban regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:99:y:2020:i:c:s0264837720301344
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837720301344
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104865?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J González-Pachón & C Romero, 2006. "An analytical framework for aggregating multiattribute utility functions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(10), pages 1241-1247, October.
    2. Benedetto Manganelli & Francesco Tajani, 2014. "Optimised management for the development of extraordinary public properties," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(2), pages 187-201, February.
    3. Gabriela B. Christmann & Oliver Ibert & Johann Jessen & Uwe-Jens Walther, 2020. "Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – phases, actors, conflicts," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 496-520, March.
    4. Alessandra Battisti & Asia Barnocchi & Silvia Iorio, 2019. "Urban Regeneration Process: The Case of a Residential Complex in a Suburb of Rome, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Bottero, Marta & Oppio, Alessandra & Bonardo, Martina & Quaglia, Giulia, 2019. "Hybrid evaluation approaches for urban regeneration processes of landfills and industrial sites: the case of the Kwun Tong area in Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 585-594.
    6. Yiming Wang & Pengcheng Xiang, 2019. "Investigate the Conduction Path of Stakeholder Conflict of Urban Regeneration Sustainability in China: the Application of Social-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    7. María Rocío Ruiz-Pérez & Mª Desirée Alba-Rodríguez & Raúl Castaño-Rosa & Jaime Solís-Guzmán & Madelyn Marrero, 2019. "HEREVEA Tool for Economic and Environmental Impact Evaluation for Sustainable Planning Policy in Housing Renovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Christmann, Gabriela B. & Ibert, Oliver & Jessen, Johann & Walther, Uwe-Jens, 2020. "Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – phases, actors, conflicts," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 28(3), pages 496-520.
    9. Lucia Della Spina & Francesco Calabrò & Alessandro Rugolo, 2020. "Social Housing: An Appraisal Model of the Economic Benefits in Urban Regeneration Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Elliot, Thomas & Bertrand, Alexandre & Babí Almenar, Javier & Petucco, Claudio & Proença, Vânia & Rugani, Benedetto, 2019. "Spatial optimisation of urban ecosystem services through integrated participatory and multi-objective integer linear programming," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 409(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Tatiana Moreira de Souza, 2019. "Urban regeneration and tenure mix: exploring the dynamics of neighbour interactions," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9), pages 1521-1542, October.
    12. Lesley Hemphill & Stanley McGreal & Jim Berry, 2002. "An aggregated weighting system for evaluating sustainable urban regeneration," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 353-373.
    13. Stefano Capolongo & Leopoldo Sdino & Marta Dell’Ovo & Rossella Moioli & Stefano Della Torre, 2019. "How to Assess Urban Regeneration Proposals by Considering Conflicting Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Leccis, Francesca, 2019. "Regeneration programmes: Enforcing the right to housing or fostering gentrification? The example of Bankside in London," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lak, Azadeh & Sharifi, Ayyoob & Khazaei, Mohsen & Aghamolaei, Reihaneh, 2021. "Towards a framework for driving sustainable urban regeneration with ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Jue Wang & Yi Yang & Huan Huang & Fan Wang, 2022. "Stakeholder Management in Government-Led Urban Regeneration: A Case Study of the Eastern Suburbs in Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Figueiredo, Yohani Dominik dos Santos & Prim, Marcia Aparecida & Dandolini, Gertrudes Aparecida, 2022. "Urban regeneration in the light of social innovation: A systematic integrative literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. repec:eur:ejserj:622 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Zhen Liu & Ziyuan Chi & Mohamed Osmani & Peter Demian, 2021. "Blockchain and Building Information Management (BIM) for Sustainable Building Development within the Context of Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Kaizhong Yao & Yuefeng Lu & Xiwen Li & Huaizhao Ruan & Feng Gao & Shiwei Shao & Ying Sun & Yanru Liu & Jing Li, 2023. "Evaluating and Analyzing Urban Renewal and Transformation Potential Based on AET Models: A Case Study of Shenzhen City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christmann, Gabriela B., 2020. "How Social Innovation can be Supported in Structurally Weak Rural Regions," IRS Dialog 5/2020e, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    2. Benedetto Manganelli & Sabina Tataranna & Marco Vona & Francesco Paolo Del Giudice, 2022. "An Innovative Approach for the Enhancement of Public Real Estate Assets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Evgeny M. Bukhvald, 2020. "Managing the spatial development of the Russian economy: Goals and tools," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(6), pages 2-14, December.
    4. Zerrer, Nicole & Sept, Ariane, 2020. "Smart Villagers as Actors of Digital Social Innovation in Rural Areas," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(4), pages 78-88.
    5. Wang, Hao & Zhao, Yizhu & Gao, Xichen & Gao, Boyang, 2021. "Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. Rogatka, Krzysztof & Kowalski, Mateusz & Starczewski, Tomasz, 2023. "Less important space? Spatial planning in small towns in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    7. Nicole Zerrer & Ariane Sept, 2020. "Smart Villagers as Actors of Digital Social Innovation in Rural Areas," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 78-88.
    8. Nicole Zerrer & Ariane Sept, 2020. "Smart Villagers as Actors of Digital Social Innovation in Rural Areas," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 78-88.
    9. Christmann, Gabriela B., 2020. "Wie man soziale Innovationen in strukturschwachen ländlichen Räumen befördern kann [How Social Innovation can be Supported in Structurally Weak Rural Regions]," IRS Dialog 5/2020, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    10. Muxin Jia & Ang Liu & Taro Narahara, 2024. "The Integration of Dual Evaluation and Minimum Spanning Tree Clustering to Support Decision-Making in Territorial Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Ghadiri, Mohaddese & Sarrafi, Mozaffar, 2022. "Integrating support groups, an effective approach to regenerate historic neighborhoods of Iran Case study: Oudlajan Neighborhood, Tehran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. Yuqi Zhang & Sungik Kang & Ja-Hoon Koo, 2021. "Perception Difference and Conflicts of Stakeholders in the Urban Regeneration Project: A Case Study of Nanluoguxiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Lesley Hemphill & Jim Berry & Stanley McGreal, 2004. "An Indicator-based Approach to Measuring Sustainable Urban Regeneration Performance: Part 1, Conceptual Foundations and Methodological Framework," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(4), pages 725-755, April.
    14. Shen, Tiyan & Yao, Xinyi & Wen, Fenghua, 2021. "The Urban Regeneration Engine Model: An analytical framework and case study of the renewal of old communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    15. Cecília Szigeti & Zoltán Major & Dániel Róbert Szabó & Áron Szennay, 2023. "The Ecological Footprint of Construction Materials—A Standardized Approach from Hungary," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Alessandra Battisti & Livia Calcagni & Alberto Calenzo & Aurora Angelozzi & Miriam Errigo & Maurizio Marceca & Silvia Iorio, 2021. "Urban Health: Assessment of Indoor Environment Spillovers on Health in a Distressed Urban Area of Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Marco Gola & Marta Dell’Ovo & Stefano Scalone & Stefano Capolongo, 2022. "Adaptive Reuse of Social and Healthcare Structures: The Case Study as a Research Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Aleksandra Jadach-Sepioło & Katarzyna Olejniczak-Szuster & Michał Dziadkiewicz, 2021. "Does Environment Matter in Smart Revitalization Strategies? Management towards Sustainable Urban Regeneration Programs in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Rachid Belaroussi & Margherita Pazzini & Israa Issa & Corinne Dionisio & Claudio Lantieri & Elena Díaz González & Valeria Vignali & Sonia Adelé, 2023. "Assessing the Future Streetscape of Rimini Harbor Docks with Virtual Reality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    20. Maria Cerreta & Gaia Daldanise & Ludovica La Rocca & Simona Panaro, 2021. "Triggering Active Communities for Cultural Creative Cities: The “Hack the City” Play ReCH Mission in the Salerno Historic Centre (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:99:y:2020:i:c:s0264837720301344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.