IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2904-d512601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception Difference and Conflicts of Stakeholders in the Urban Regeneration Project: A Case Study of Nanluoguxiang

Author

Listed:
  • Yuqi Zhang

    (Department of Urban and Regional Development, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Sungik Kang

    (Department of Urban and Regional Development, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Ja-Hoon Koo

    (Department of Urban and Regional Development, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea)

Abstract

While specific strategies and action plans, such as community engagement, partnerships, and social networks, have been vastly explored in light of the growing significance of collaborative governance in urban regeneration projects, there is little information on the differences in the perceptions of stakeholders regarding collaborative governance. This study analyzed the differences in the perceptions of local governments, residents, merchants, and urban planners, all participants in the urban regeneration of Nanluoguxiang, China’s representative urban regeneration project. The main results of the study are as follows. First, the perception of participations’ roles and the importance of collaborative governance are significant differences between stakeholders. Second, if they have insufficient knowledge of the functions and significance of other participating groups, diverse conflicts can occur in the process of urban regeneration. Third, since various conflicts between participants could play a crucial role in the delay the urban regeneration projects, urban planners require coordinators and mediators to enable smooth project progress.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuqi Zhang & Sungik Kang & Ja-Hoon Koo, 2021. "Perception Difference and Conflicts of Stakeholders in the Urban Regeneration Project: A Case Study of Nanluoguxiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2904-:d:512601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying-Chyi Chou & Chia-Han Yang & Ching-Hua Lu & Van Thac Dang & Pei-An Yang, 2017. "Building Criteria for Evaluating Green Project Management: An Integrated Approach of DEMATEL and ANP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Brenner, Neil, 2004. "New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199270064.
    3. Stefano Capolongo & Leopoldo Sdino & Marta Dell’Ovo & Rossella Moioli & Stefano Della Torre, 2019. "How to Assess Urban Regeneration Proposals by Considering Conflicting Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Junwei Gan & Li Luo, 2017. "Using DEMATEL and Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets to Identify Critical Factors Influencing the Recycling Rate of End-Of-Life Vehicles in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Keeney,Ralph L. & Raiffa,Howard, 1993. "Decisions with Multiple Objectives," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521438834, January.
    6. Yingjie Hu & Emma Morales, 2016. "The Unintended Consequences of a Culture-Led Regeneration Project in Beijing, China," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 82(2), pages 148-151, April.
    7. Lieselot Vandenbussche, 2018. "Mapping Stakeholders’ Relating Pathways in Collaborative Planning Processes; A Longitudinal Case Study of an Urban Regeneration Partnership," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 534-557, August.
    8. Yiming Wang & Pengcheng Xiang, 2019. "Investigate the Conduction Path of Stakeholder Conflict of Urban Regeneration Sustainability in China: the Application of Social-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Sonn, Jung Won & Chen, Kelly Wanjing & Wang, He & Liu, Xiao, 2017. "A top-down creation of a cultural cluster for urban regeneration: The case of OCT Loft, Shenzhen," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 307-316.
    10. Gholamreza Dehdasht & Rosli Mohamad Zin & M. Salim Ferwati & Mu’azu Mohammed Abdullahi & Ali Keyvanfar & Ronald McCaffer, 2017. "DEMATEL-ANP Risk Assessment in Oil and Gas Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-24, August.
    11. Luke Boyle & Kathy Michell & François Viruly, 2018. "A Critique of the Application of Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment Tools in Urban Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Federico Savini, 2011. "The Endowment of Community Participation: Institutional Settings in Two Urban Regeneration Projects," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 949-968, September.
    13. John F. Forester, 1999. "The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262561220, April.
    14. Yingjie Hu & Emma Morales, 2016. "Correction to: The Unintended Consequences of a Culture-Led Regeneration Project in Beijing, China," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 82(3), pages 296-296, July.
    15. Sukran Seker & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2017. "Application of Fuzzy DEMATEL Method for Analyzing Occupational Risks on Construction Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Yuqi Zhang & Sungik Kang & Ja-Hoon Koo, 2019. "What Is the Critical Factor and Relationship of Urban Regeneration in a Historic District?: A Case of the Nanluoguxiang Area in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Kexi Xu & Geoffrey Qiping Shen & Guiwen Liu & Igor Martek, 2019. "Demolition of Existing Buildings in Urban Renewal Projects: A Decision Support System in the China Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuqi Zhang & Sungik Kang & Ja-Hoon Koo, 2019. "What Is the Critical Factor and Relationship of Urban Regeneration in a Historic District?: A Case of the Nanluoguxiang Area in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Valmohammadi, Changiz & Khaki, Masoud Mirahmadi, 2019. "Determinants for selection of projects for exploitation of mines in Iran," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Tao Yu & Qi Tang & Yongxiang Wu & Yaowu Wang & Zezhou Wu, 2019. "What Determines the Success of Culture-Led Regeneration Projects in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Moath Alrifaey & Tang Sai Hong & Eris Elianddy Supeni & Azizan As’arry & Chun Kit Ang, 2019. "Identification and Prioritization of Risk Factors in an Electrical Generator Based on the Hybrid FMEA Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Zhang, Jiayu & Yang, Xiaodong & Wang, Hao, 2021. "Age-friendly regeneration of urban settlements in China: Game and incentives of stakeholders in decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    6. Elliot Siemiatycki, 2013. "A Smooth Ride? From Industrial to Creative Urbanism in Oshawa, Ontario," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1766-1784, September.
    7. Saarikoski, Heli & Mustajoki, Jyri & Hjerppe, Turo & Aapala, Kaisu, 2019. "Participatory multi-criteria decision analysis in valuing peatland ecosystem services—Trade-offs related to peat extraction vs. pristine peatlands in Southern Finland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 17-28.
    8. Manganelli, Benedetto & Tataranna, Sabina & Pontrandolfi, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "A model to support the decision-making in urban regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Geneviève Zembri-Mary & Virginie Engrand-Linder, 2023. "Urban planning law in the face of the Olympic challenge: Between innovation and criticism of exceptional urban regeneration," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(4), pages 369-388, June.
    10. KARRI PASANEN & MIKKO KURTTILA & JOUNI PYKÄlÄINEN & JYRKI KANGAS & PEKKA LESKINEN, 2005. "Mesta — Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners' Decision-Support Environment For The Evaluation Of Alternative Forest Plans Over The Internet," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(04), pages 601-620.
    11. Steven Tufts, 2007. "Emerging Labour Strategies in Toronto's Hotel Sector: Toward a Spatial Circuit of Union Renewal," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(10), pages 2383-2404, October.
    12. Navé Wald & Douglas P. Hill, 2016. "‘Rescaling’ alternative food systems: from food security to food sovereignty," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 33(1), pages 203-213, March.
    13. Kevin Fox Gotham, 2014. "Racialization and Rescaling: Post-Katrina Rebuilding and the Louisiana Road Home Program," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 773-790, May.
    14. Simin Yan & Anna Growe, 2022. "Regional Planning, Land-Use Management, and Governance in German Metropolitan Regions—The Case of Rhine–Neckar Metropolitan Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    15. Andrew Clarke & Lynda Cheshire, 2018. "The post-political state? The role of administrative reform in managing tensions between urban growth and liveability in Brisbane, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(16), pages 3545-3562, December.
    16. E. Melanie DuPuis & Brian J. Gareau, 2008. "Neoliberal Knowledge: The Decline of Technocracy and the Weakening of the Montreal Protocol," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 89(5), pages 1212-1229, December.
    17. Gerd Gigerenzer, 1997. "Bounded Rationality: Models of Fast and Frugal Inference," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 133(II), pages 201-218, June.
    18. Federico Savini, 2013. "The Governability of National Spatial Planning: Light Instruments and Logics of Governmental Action in Strategic Urban Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(8), pages 1592-1607, June.
    19. Shuang Liu & Kirsten Maclean & Cathy Robinson, 2019. "A cost-effective framework to prioritise stakeholder participation options," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(3), pages 221-241, November.
    20. Khaled, Oumaima & Minoux, Michel & Mousseau, Vincent & Michel, Stéphane & Ceugniet, Xavier, 2018. "A multi-criteria repair/recovery framework for the tail assignment problem in airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 137-151.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2904-:d:512601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.