IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v130y2023ics0264837723001400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Less important space? Spatial planning in small towns in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Rogatka, Krzysztof
  • Kowalski, Mateusz
  • Starczewski, Tomasz

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present the condition of spatial planning in small towns in the Kujawsko-Pomorskie Voivodeship in Poland (urban municipalities up to 20,000 inhabitants) taking into account the analytical background in the form of a set of small towns (urban municipalities) in Poland. The authors posed the following research questions: (Q1) How up-to-date is the strategic planning document Study of conditions and directions of spatial development (SCDSDs) in small towns? (Q2) What is the coverage of small towns with local spatial development plans (LSDPs) and is it sufficient, and to what degree are decisions on development conditions (DCs) used in spatial planning in small towns? (Q3) What is the opinion of the inhabitants of a small town (Lipno) about spatial planning and public participation in the planning process conducted in the city in which they live? To achieve the aim of the study, the authors conducted a three-stage study consisting of a qualitative and a quantitative part. In the qualitative part, an assessment was conducted of the topicality of the Studies of Conditions and Directions of Spatial Development (SCDSDs) of small towns in the Kujawsko-Pomorskie Voivodeship. In the quantitative part, we analysed and evaluated statistical data from the Local Data Bank of Statistics Poland concerning local spatial development plans (LSDPs) and decisions on development conditions (DCs) in small towns in the Kujawsko-Pomorskie Voivodeship. At this stage, a questionnaire was also carried out using the Paper and Pencil Interview + Computer Assisted Web Interview (PAPI+CAWI) method, addressed to the community of the town of Lipno. The research shows that the problems in small towns are: low topicality of SCDSDs, and in the vast majority of the small towns analysed – very low LSDP coverage. These municipalities also issue the largest number of DCs, which exacerbates the spatial chaos. The questionnaire survey shows that residents are interested in issues related to the shaping of urban space, but indicate a lack of adequate knowledge on spatial planning, which lowers their participation in the process. They also recognise the great importance of spatial planning in socio-economic development, which translates into quality of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Rogatka, Krzysztof & Kowalski, Mateusz & Starczewski, Tomasz, 2023. "Less important space? Spatial planning in small towns in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:130:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723001400
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723001400
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106674?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rogatka, Krzysztof & Starczewski, Tomasz & Kowalski, Mateusz, 2021. "Urban resilience in spatial planning of polish cities - True or false? Transformational perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Miroslaw Biczkowski & Iwona Müller-Fraczek & Joanna Muszynska & Michal Bernard Pietrzak & Justyna Wilk, 2014. "The Delimitation Of Bipolar Metropolitan Area Within The Kujawsko-Pomorskie Region," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 5(2), pages 101-122, June.
    3. Krajewska, Małgorzata & Szopińska, Kinga & Siemińska, Ewa, 2021. "Value of land properties in the context of planning conditions risk on the example of the suburban zone of a Polish city," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Przemysław Śleszyński & Adam Kowalewski & Tadeusz Markowski & Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Maciej Nowak, 2020. "The Contemporary Economic Costs of Spatial Chaos: Evidence from Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-28, July.
    5. Gabriela B. Christmann & Oliver Ibert & Johann Jessen & Uwe-Jens Walther, 2020. "Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – phases, actors, conflicts," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 496-520, March.
    6. Christmann, Gabriela B. & Ibert, Oliver & Jessen, Johann & Walther, Uwe-Jens, 2020. "Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – phases, actors, conflicts," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 28(3), pages 496-520.
    7. Kukulska-Kozieł, Anita, 2023. "Buildable land overzoning. Have new planning regulations in Poland resolved the issue?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    8. M. Ragolane & T. L. Malatji, 2021. "Lack of public participation and good governance, who is fooling who?," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 26(1), pages 32-44, Decembrie.
    9. Niedziałkowski, Krzysztof & Beunen, Raoul, 2019. "The risky business of planning reform – The evolution of local spatial planning in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 11-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evgeny M. Bukhvald, 2020. "Managing the spatial development of the Russian economy: Goals and tools," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(6), pages 2-14, December.
    2. Zerrer, Nicole & Sept, Ariane, 2020. "Smart Villagers as Actors of Digital Social Innovation in Rural Areas," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(4), pages 78-88.
    3. Kędra, Arleta & Maleszyk, Piotr & Visvizi, Anna, 2023. "Engaging citizens in land use policy in the smart city context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    4. Nicole Zerrer & Ariane Sept, 2020. "Smart Villagers as Actors of Digital Social Innovation in Rural Areas," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 78-88.
    5. Manganelli, Benedetto & Tataranna, Sabina & Pontrandolfi, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "A model to support the decision-making in urban regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Christmann, Gabriela B., 2020. "How Social Innovation can be Supported in Structurally Weak Rural Regions," IRS Dialog 5/2020e, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    7. Poklewski-Koziełł, Damian & Dudzic-Gyurkovich, Karolina & Duarte, Carlos Marmolejo, 2023. "Investigating urban form, and walkability measures in the new developments. The case study of Garnizon in Gdansk," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Nicole Zerrer & Ariane Sept, 2020. "Smart Villagers as Actors of Digital Social Innovation in Rural Areas," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 78-88.
    9. Christmann, Gabriela B., 2020. "Wie man soziale Innovationen in strukturschwachen ländlichen Räumen befördern kann [How Social Innovation can be Supported in Structurally Weak Rural Regions]," IRS Dialog 5/2020, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    10. Muxin Jia & Ang Liu & Taro Narahara, 2024. "The Integration of Dual Evaluation and Minimum Spanning Tree Clustering to Support Decision-Making in Territorial Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Adams, Clare & Frantzeskaki, Niki & Moglia, Magnus, 2023. "Mainstreaming nature-based solutions in cities: A systematic literature review and a proposal for facilitating urban transitions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    12. Stefan Ivanov, 2022. "Factors Influencing The Investment Policy Of Resorts On The Bulgarian Black Sea Coast," INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "CONSTRUCTION ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REAL PROPERTY", University of Economics - Varna, issue 1, pages 210-219.
    13. Dragomir Stefanov & Maria Dimitrova, 2022. "Study Of Labor Productivity In The Construction Sector In Bulgaria During 2007-2021 Period," INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "CONSTRUCTION ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REAL PROPERTY", University of Economics - Varna, issue 1, pages 79-88.
    14. Yiwen Shao & Yao Sun & Zhiru Zheng, 2023. "How Do Comprehensive Territorial Plans Frame Resilience? A Content Analysis of Plans by Major Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Bielecka Elzbieta, 2024. "The Spatiotemporal Analysis of Land Take Exemplified by Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.
    16. Tsvetomir Manolov, 2022. "Influence Of The Crises On The Working Capital Of The Construction Companies In Varna Region," INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "CONSTRUCTION ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REAL PROPERTY", University of Economics - Varna, issue 1, pages 145-151.
    17. Małgorzata Blaszke & Iwona Foryś & Maciej J. Nowak & Bartosz Mickiewicz, 2022. "Selected Characteristics of Municipalities as Determinants of Enactment in Municipal Spatial Plans for Renewable Energy Sources—The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Dimitria Karadimova, 2022. "The Labour Market In The Construction Sector," INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "CONSTRUCTION ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REAL PROPERTY", University of Economics - Varna, issue 1, pages 129-136.
    19. Yanitsa Yankova, 2022. "Spatial Data For Effective Planning And Management," INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "CONSTRUCTION ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REAL PROPERTY", University of Economics - Varna, issue 1, pages 174-180.
    20. Piotr Lityński & Piotr Serafin, 2021. "Polynuclearity as a Spatial Measure of Urban Sprawl: Testing the Percentiles Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:130:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723001400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.