IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v78y2018icp386-396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying urban land expansion dynamics through improved land management institution model: Application in Ningxia-Inner Mongolia, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Yongjiao
  • Dong, Suocheng
  • Huang, Haosheng
  • Zhai, Jun
  • Li, Yu
  • Huang, Dingxuan

Abstract

It is of great importance to investigate mechanism of urban expansion as to policy-making and implementation of urban planning in China. The purpose of this study is to carry out a thorough investigation on quantifying dynamic process of urban land expansion through an improved Land Management Institution model (LMI), which was further applied in Ningxia-Inner Mongolia region, China. Therefore, an improved LMI model was developed by introducing the varying panel approach which can well determine the major contributors of spatial differences of urban land expansion and quantify the evolution of land management institution. Through this investigation, following findings were achieved. Firstly, the improved LMI model could efficiently quantify and determine spatial differences of endogenous factors of urban land expansion, and the land management institution evolution. The land management institution evolution presented a path dependence with a stable trajectory, which meant urban land expansion were well coincided with the evolution of land management institution. Secondly, the improved LMI model application in Ningxia-Inner Mongolia region disclosed that urban land expansion had an obvious negative effects of lock-in phase characters in land management institution evolution. Marginal effects of major influencing factors of urban land expansion contributed greatly to the differences of urban land expansion in terms of different sectors and regions. Finally, dynamics analysis of urban land expansion in this study area suggested that its urbanization had similar urbanization patterns with cities in elsewhere of China, and meanwhile it presented distinct characters. The massive conversion of land use has stimulated high-speed economic growth in the short term at the expense of eco-environment in the long term. It is suggested that governments at all levels should pay more attention to land management institution reform, industrial adjustment, technological innovation as to realize sustainable urbanization.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Yongjiao & Dong, Suocheng & Huang, Haosheng & Zhai, Jun & Li, Yu & Huang, Dingxuan, 2018. "Quantifying urban land expansion dynamics through improved land management institution model: Application in Ningxia-Inner Mongolia, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 386-396.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:78:y:2018:i:c:p:386-396
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718301212
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lahtinen, Tuomas J. & Hämäläinen, Raimo P., 2016. "Path dependence and biases in the even swaps decision analysis method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 890-898.
    2. Arthur, W Brian, 1989. "Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(394), pages 116-131, March.
    3. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    4. Hämäläinen, Raimo P. & Lahtinen, Tuomas J., 2016. "Path dependence in Operational Research—How the modeling process can influence the results," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 14-20.
    5. Jean‐Philippe Vergne & Rodolphe Durand, 2010. "The Missing Link Between the Theory and Empirics of Path Dependence: Conceptual Clarification, Testability Issue, and Methodological Implications," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 736-759, June.
    6. Liu, Yong & Li, Jinchang & Zhang, Hong, 2012. "An ecosystem service valuation of land use change in Taiyuan City, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 127-132.
    7. Danny Miller, 1992. "Environmental Fit Versus Internal Fit," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 159-178, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenfang Pu & Anlu Zhang, 2021. "Can Market Reforms Curb the Expansion of Industrial Land?—Based on the Panel Data Analysis of Five National-Level Urban Agglomerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Guangliang Zhou & Di Zhang & Qian Zhou & Tao Shi, 2022. "Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics of the “Production–Living–Ecology” Space in the Yellow River Basin and Its Driving Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-26, November.
    3. Bowen Chen & Changyan Wu & Xianjin Huang & Xuefeng Yang, 2020. "Examining the Relationship between Urban Land Expansion and Economic Linkage Using Coupling Analysis: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Yongjiao Wu & Huazhu Zheng & Yu Li & Claudio O. Delang & Jiao Qian, 2021. "Carbon Productivity and Mitigation: Evidence from Industrial Development and Urbanization in the Central and Western Regions of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Olapade, Daramola Thompson & Aluko, Bioye Tajudeen, 2021. "Understanding the nature of land delivery institutions and channels from a tripartite perspective: A conceptual framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Wang, Chenglong & Liu, Hui & Zhang, Mengtian, 2020. "Exploring the mechanism of border effect on urban land expansion: A case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Yu Liu & Chen Zeng & Huatai Cui & Yanhua Song, 2018. "Sustainable Land Urbanization and Ecological Carrying Capacity: A Spatially Explicit Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khraisha, Tamer, 2020. "Complex economic problems and fitness landscapes: Assessment and methodological perspectives," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 390-407.
    2. Lei Jin & Keran Duan & Chunming Shi & Xianwei Ju, 2017. "The Impact of Technological Progress in the Energy Sector on Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Analysis from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Martin Henning & Erik Stam & Rik Wenting, 2013. "Path Dependence Research in Regional Economic Development: Cacophony or Knowledge Accumulation?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1348-1362, September.
    4. Magali Malherbe & Fanny Simon-Lee, 2015. "Learning and knowledge accumulation as sources of influence for actors during path constitution: the example of the emergence of NFC technology," Post-Print hal-01597620, HAL.
    5. Tom Mark Brown, 2021. "A Path Dependency Approach to Governance Practices at a Public University of the Western Cape, South Africa," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 110127-1101, December.
    6. Lahtinen, Tuomas J. & Hämäläinen, Raimo P. & Jenytin, Cosmo, 2020. "On preference elicitation processes which mitigate the accumulation of biases in multi-criteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 201-210.
    7. Neil Kay, 2013. "Lock-in, path dependence, and the internationalization of QWERTY," Working Papers 1310, University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics.
    8. Sydow, Jörg & Schreyögg, Georg & Koch, Jochen, 2020. "Current interest in the theory of organizational path dependence: A short update on the occasion of the 2019 AMR Decade Award," Discussion Papers 2020/12, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    9. Yaping Liu & Jie Yu, 2022. "Path dependence in pro-poor tourism," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 973-993, January.
    10. James Simmie, 2020. "Agency, new technological path creation and long waves of local economic growth in Oxfordshire," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(8), pages 723-746, December.
    11. Moncada, J.A. & Junginger, M. & Lukszo, Z. & Faaij, A. & Weijnen, M., 2017. "Exploring path dependence, policy interactions, and actor behavior in the German biodiesel supply chain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 370-381.
    12. Jiri Mazurek & Radomír Perzina & Dominik Strzałka & Bartosz Kowal & Paweł Kuraś & Barbora Petrů Puhrová & Robert Rajs, 2024. "Is the best–worst method path dependent? Evidence from an empirical study," 4OR, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 387-409, September.
    13. Peter Buhanist, 2015. "Path Dependency in the Energy Industry: The Case of Long-term Oil-indexed Gas Import Contracts in Continental Europe," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 5(4), pages 934-948.
    14. James Simmie & Rolf Sternberg & Juliet Carpenter, 2014. "New technological path creation: evidence from the British and German wind energy industries," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 875-904, September.
    15. Ying Yong Ding & Kirsten Kininmonth & Sam McKinstry, 2017. "Cocooned: path dependence and the demise of Anderson & Robertson Ltd, Scotland’s last silk throwsters," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(3), pages 382-407, April.
    16. GianPaolo Abatecola, 2012. "Path Dependent Entrepreneurs? A Decision Making Perspective," DSI Essays Series, DSI - Dipartimento di Studi sull'Impresa, vol. 24.
    17. Garud, Raghu & Gehman, Joel, 2012. "Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: Evolutionary, relational and durational," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 980-995.
    18. Becker, Markus C. & Rullani, Francesco & Zirpoli, Francesco, 2021. "The role of digital artefacts in early stages of distributed innovation processes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    19. Roberta Capello & Camilla Lenzi, 2018. "The dynamics of regional learning paradigms and trajectories," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 727-748, September.
    20. Schmidt, Tobias S. & Battke, Benedikt & Grosspietsch, David & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2016. "Do deployment policies pick technologies by (not) picking applications?—A simulation of investment decisions in technologies with multiple applications," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1965-1983.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:78:y:2018:i:c:p:386-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.