IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v100y2021ics026483771931498x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the nature of land delivery institutions and channels from a tripartite perspective: A conceptual framework

Author

Listed:
  • Olapade, Daramola Thompson
  • Aluko, Bioye Tajudeen

Abstract

The importance of land delivery institutions (LDIs) in facilitating access to land by providing different land delivery channel (LDCs) has long been established in literature. However, understanding of the nature of LDIs has been in piecemeal with focus on either the organisational structure of the LDIs, institutional mechanism or the characteristics of land being supplied by the formal or informal LDIs. There has also been the dichotomous classification of land delivery channels as being formal or informal. Such previous analyses which focused on one particular segment of the land delivery system do not reflect the multi-dimensional issues associated with LDIs and LDCs and might encourage formation of policies that are not encompassing and difficult to implement. It is in this regard that this paper provides a holistic view of land delivery institutions and channels. This is with a view to improving understanding of the land delivery systems. By using desktop analysis of past authors’ submissions, a conceptual framework derived from the theory of new institutional economic, and case study analysis of land delivery institutions and channels in Lagos Nigeria. this paper provides a framework for analysis of LDIs and LDCs from a tripartite perspective. The paper presents an in-depth examination of formal, semi-formal and informal land delivery channels and their respective LDIs through the prism of organisational structure of LDIs, their institutional mechanisms and the characteristics of land being supplied by the LDIs.

Suggested Citation

  • Olapade, Daramola Thompson & Aluko, Bioye Tajudeen, 2021. "Understanding the nature of land delivery institutions and channels from a tripartite perspective: A conceptual framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:100:y:2021:i:c:s026483771931498x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483771931498X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greif, Avner, 1998. "Historical and Comparative Institutional Analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(2), pages 80-84, May.
    2. Williamson, Oliver, 2009. "The Theory of the Firm as Governance Structure: From Choice to Contract," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 111-134, December.
    3. Deininger, Klaus & Hilhorst, Thea & Songwe, Vera, 2014. "Identifying and addressing land governance constraints to support intensification and land market operation: Evidence from 10 African countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 76-87.
    4. Douglass C. North, 1991. "Institutions," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 97-112, Winter.
    5. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    6. Wu, Yongjiao & Dong, Suocheng & Huang, Haosheng & Zhai, Jun & Li, Yu & Huang, Dingxuan, 2018. "Quantifying urban land expansion dynamics through improved land management institution model: Application in Ningxia-Inner Mongolia, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 386-396.
    7. Jordan Blekking & Cascade Tuholske & Tom Evans, 2017. "Adaptive Governance and Market Heterogeneity: An Institutional Analysis of an Urban Food System in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Adam, Achamyeleh Gashu, 2019. "Thinking outside the box and introducing land readjustment against the conventional urban land acquisition and delivery method in Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 624-631.
    9. Peter O. Adeniyi, 2011. "Improving Land Sector Governance in Nigeria," World Bank Publications - Reports 28525, The World Bank Group.
    10. Agboola, Alirat Olayinka & Scofield, David & Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed, 2017. "Understanding property market operations from a dual institutional perspective: The case of Lagos, Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 89-96.
    11. Mabogunje, A.L., 1992. "Perspective on Urban Land and Urban Management Policies in Sub-Saharan Africa," Papers 196, World Bank - Technical Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agboola, Alirat Olayinka & Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed & Olapade, Daramola Thompson & Odebode, Adedayo Ayodeji, 2023. "Transnational large-scale land investments in developing economies: What role do formal institutions play?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yochanan Shachmurove, 2012. "Failing Institutions Are at the Core of the U.S. Financial Crisis," PIER Working Paper Archive 12-040, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    2. Stephanie Rosenkranz & Patrick W. Schmitz, 2007. "Can Coasean Bargaining Justify Pigouvian Taxation?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 74(296), pages 573-585, November.
    3. Wiser, R. H., 2000. "The role of public policy in emerging green power markets: an analysis of marketer preferences," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 177-212, June.
    4. Rossi, Enrico, 2020. "Reconsidering the dual nature of property rights: personal property and capital in the law and economics of property rights," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105840, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Zoran Stefanovic, Branislav Mitrovic, 2015. "Revisiting New Institutional Economics: Basic Concepts And Research Directions," Ekonomika, Journal for Economic Theory and Practice and Social Issues 2014-04, „Ekonomika“ Society of Economists, Niš (Serbia).
    6. Christopher John Boudreaux, 2015. "Democratic age and the size of governmen," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(3), pages 1531-1542.
    7. Williamson, Oliver E., 2010. "Transaction Cost Economics: The Natural Progression," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 215-226.
    8. Underhill, Geoffrey, 2010. "Theory and the Market after the Crisis: the Endogeneity of Financial Governance," CEPR Discussion Papers 8164, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Per L. Bylund, 2015. "Signifying Williamson's Contribution to the Transaction Cost Approach: An Agent-Based Simulation of Coasean Transaction Costs and Specialization," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 148-174, January.
    10. Braunfels, Elias, 2016. "Further Unbundling Institutions," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 13/2016, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    11. Jean-Roger Essombe Edimo, 1998. "Dynamique financière des tontines : quels enseignements pour le financement des petites entreprises en Afrique ?," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 39(156), pages 861-883.
    12. Glachant, Jean-Michel, 1998. "England's wholesale electricity market: could this hybrid institutional arrangement be transposed to the European Union?1," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 63-74, June.
    13. Serkan Degirmenci, 2011. "Do Institutions Matter for Regional Economic Growth and Development? The Case of Turkey," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1180, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Dilger, Alexander & Frick, Bernd & Speckbacher, Gerhard, 1999. "Mitbestimmung als zentrale Frage der Corporate Governance," Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Diskussionspapiere 02/1999, University of Greifswald, Faculty of Law and Economics.
    15. Gerry Rodgers, 1992. "Institutional Economics, Development Economics and Labour Economics," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 31(4), pages 581-605.
    16. Ruttan, Vernon W., 2006. "Social science knowledge and induced institutional innovation: an institutional design perspective," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 249-272, December.
    17. repec:rza:wpaper:236 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Schmitz, Patrick W., 2021. "Optimal ownership of public goods under asymmetric information," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    19. Yang, Chen & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    20. Monteiro, Guilherme Fowler A. & Saes, Maria Sylvia Macchione & Caleman, Silvia Morales de Queiroz & Zylbersztajn, Décio, 2012. "The Role of Empirical Research in the Study of Complex Forms of Governance in Agroindustrial Systems," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 50(4), pages 1-16, December.
    21. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:100:y:2021:i:c:s026483771931498x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.